User talk:TravisRJ

July 2021[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Chuck E. Cheese have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Chuck E. Cheese was changed by TravisRJ (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.868666 on 2021-07-27T17:07:36+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:07, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:Chuck E. Cheese.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Chuck E. Cheese.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 00:45, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Chuck E. Cheese Logo.PNG[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Chuck E. Cheese Logo.PNG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 01:45, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Chuck E. Cheese.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Chuck E. Cheese.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 14:43, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to JibJab, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:36, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Chuck E. Cheese Logo.PNG[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Chuck E. Cheese Logo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: IPhone SE (4th generation) (May 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fade258 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:IPhone SE (4th generation) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:IPhone SE (4th generation), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fade258 (talk) 03:24, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TravisRJ! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fade258 (talk) 03:24, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm SkyWarrior. An edit that you recently made to Chuck E. Cheese seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! SkyWarrior 18:55, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Wikipedia, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. SkyWarrior 21:24, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Tapir. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. SkyWarrior 21:26, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! SkyWarrior 22:17, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have exceeded three reverts today on Chuck E. Cheese. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Trivialist (talk) 22:20, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Wikipedia shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. PRAXIDICAE🌈 22:23, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It appears you have edit warred on every single article you've edited in the last 24 hours with no edit summaries or explanations - your edits may very well be good or improving the article but it's not immediately obvious even after looking in depth at them. I suggest you cease undoing others edits and start explaining all of your recent edits. If you revert someone else anywhere - without explaining to these concerns here first, I will take this to ANI. PRAXIDICAE🌈 22:24, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained revert[edit]

Hi TravisRJ

In this edit[1], you reverted my edit[2] to Officer (armed forces).

However, you left no edit summary to explain why you reverted my edit. Per WP:REVEXP, an explanation is expected ... so please can you explain? BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:21, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@BrownHairedGirl I restored your edit - I can't tell if this editor is acting in good faith or trolling given their massive reverting of pretty much everyone in every article they've touched, without explanation. I see nothing wrong with your edits. PRAXIDICAE🌈 22:26, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, @Praxidicae. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:39, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Blablubbs (talk) 22:28, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I ran a check due to a possible compromise, but there is no evidence of it from the technical side of things.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:34, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]