User talk:Trepanationsolution

This is Trepanationsolution's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

AfC notification: Draft:Adrian Howells has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Adrian Howells. Thanks! LaMona (talk) 11:25, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adrian Howells (June 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still needs any additional amount of in-depth third-party news sources overall; No press releases or trivial passing mentions.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adrian Howells and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 21:37, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Adrian Howells has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Adrian Howells. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 17:03, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adrian Howells (performance artist) has been accepted[edit]

Adrian Howells (performance artist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:25, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Martin O'Brien (artist) moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Martin O'Brien (artist), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 14:15, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martin O'Brien (artist)[edit]

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

1292simon (talk) 08:38, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 28[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nick Zedd, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tommy Turner.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hamad Butt and Kumiko Shimizu[edit]

Hi, I saw you started the draft for Hamad Butt - I'd like to contribute a bit to that article myself at some point. Also, I just started Draft:Kumiko Shimizu - feel free to contribute if you feel like it. ʈɧɛ fɨʂɧ (talk) 17:11, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I've stalled a bit on the Hamad Butt page. Please do edit and develop it. I'll do the same. Trepanationsolution (talk) 13:52, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. You prompted me to do a bit of work on it so there's now a more substantial draft for you to contribute to.

Will look at the Shimizu too. Trepanationsolution (talk) 15:35, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hamad Butt (June 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Saqib was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Review pending since my last comment on 7 June - Bio repeatedly cites hamadbutt.co.uk which is not an independent RS. Also fails to meet WP:GNG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hamad Butt and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Saqib (talk) 20:14, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Trepanationsolution! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Saqib (talk) 20:14, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]