User talk:Trichard2010

3RR Warning

Please stop removed the sourced information on Edmond, Oklahoma. By Wikipedia's three revert rule, you can be blocked for edit warring. I'll ask you in good faith to revert your edit, and continue the discussion on the talk page.

As for the talk page, please don't remove your own comments, either. You don't own your contributions, once they're here, they should stay. Removing your part of a conversation makes it difficult for others to follow what happened. I know it seems you're upset about the way the discussion went, but please readd your comments so the discussion stays whole.

We seem to have gotten off on the wrong foot, and for that, I'm sorry. I promise you, I'm not out to be difficult here. If you have any questions about Wikipedia, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, and I'll be glad to answer. Good luck! Dayewalker (talk) 20:16, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ban me then, see if I care. Trichard2010 (talk) 20:56, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody wants to ban you, but if you're going to edit here, you need to understand how the process works. I've offered to help you above, and you responded with some nasty personal attacks [1]. If you want to help edit by the Wikipedia philosophy, please go ahead. If not, good luck in the future. Dayewalker (talk) 21:29, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to talk:Edmond, Oklahoma, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Claritas § 20:22, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding the legal threats you made on my talk page. Thank you. Claritas § 06:01, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits to [[:User talk:Claritas]] could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. - Rklawton (talk) 06:04, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

- Rklawton (talk) 11:54, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Someone may want to block and/or keep an eye on User:98.108.133.177, an IP address this editor has also utilized. Beyond My Ken (talk) 20:42, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]