User talk:TrueLightWiki

1

January 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Iglesia ni Cristo has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 06:45, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Iglesia ni Cristo. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Iglesia ni Cristo was changed by TrueLightWiki (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.895674 on 2016-01-25T05:19:40+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:19, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Iglesia ni Cristo. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. /wiae /tlk 05:20, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Iglesia ni Cristo. /wiae /tlk 05:24, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 05:28, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]