User talk:Trueblood786

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Trueblood786, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Emmett5 04:17, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jinnah[edit]

You can open a discussion section if you want to see if you can add that passage. visit wiki NPOV, and importance of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:RS which are http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:CITE. omerlivesOmerlives 01:54, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

so far I dont see any discussion on Jinnah on the article's talk page. That's the page for you to discuss anyting objected to in the aticle. omerlivesOmerlives

OMERLIVES: I GUESS NO ONE GIVES A HOOT ABOUT JINNAH EXCEPT FOR YOU, SO I THINK WHAT I WROTE WAS NOT NOT VANDALISM AT ALL. DONT YOU THINK IT IS IMPORTANT TO TELL THE PUBLIC THAT MUSLIM LEAGUE WAS FOUNDED BY AGHA KHAN, WHO INCIDENTLY WAS MADE A PRINCE OF THE BRITISH EMPIRE FOR HELPING FIGHT THE FREEDEOM FIGHTERS IN INDIA. AND BY THE WAY HIS TITLE OF AGHA KHAN WAS RECINDED WHEN THE KING OF IRAN SENTENCED THIS MAN TO DEATH FOR HIS BELIEF THEREBY CAUSING AGHA KHAN TO RUN OF TO INDIA FROM PERSIA. HISTORY CANNOT BE REWRITTEN IT IS ALWAYS THERE. ?

TRUEBLOOD786

User_talk:RickK vandalism[edit]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. SushiGeek 09:50, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 HOW CAN YOU CONSIDER WHAT I WROTE VANDALISM ?

TRUEBLOOD786

Listen, first learn to sign your name as by typing 3 or 4 tildas (~) after your nickname, so that your name is hyperlinked and i tis easier for people to comunicate with you. Secondly, learn that your opinions do not count as fact. I have an opinion about many world figures, and events which other may or maynot agree with. When you make such a fantastic claim, always use a langauge which does not reflect a rabid point of view, so first know how to use a an NPOV language. Secondly, If you make such an edit, ANY administrator or user who has contributed to the article helping to make it a "Featured article" will delete it. Go ahead try and if you keep doing the edit, you will be banned. It is not personal, though, yes, I am amused by your attitude buddy. And most importantly, if you have issues, questions, problems or want to make a major change in an article, then first discuss it in the discussion page. The discussion tab is right next to the article tab just like your use page here. SO go and open a topis there and write what and why you want to add what you want. You'll get a response or two. you'll see. omerlivesOmerlives 21:01, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

lol whatever. Omerlives 03:45, 21 June 2006 (UTC) Oh and I am not Punjabi. ciao.[reply]

Trueblood, Jinnah's religion has been mentioned along with his political predilection. He was not religious. Neither did he found Pakistan in the name of religion IMO. In any event, the info you wanted to mention was not acceptable according to wikipedia policy anyways. Omerlives BTW you dont need to write your name everytime. Just put tildas thrice or 4 times if you also want to mention the time and date you made the entry. Omerlives 06:27, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tribes?[edit]

You wrote on my talk page: "I checked into the Sudhan tribe and the Sadozai, there is no consenses if they are the same tribe therefore I suggest that Sudhan should be kept as a separate article rather than Sadozai. Can you comment, I will get the information including the citations to fix the article."

I have no idea what you are talking about. Maurreen 18:50, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

lower the caps[edit]

It is considered impolite to write with your caps lock on. It comes across as brash, impolite and loud. Other than that you have your right to your opinion regarding Pakistan, Pakistanis, Islam, Jinnah, Israel, Hindus and so forth. I just don't agree with you. Omerlives 19:57, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Raw.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Raw.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:07, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Poonch[edit]

I suppose you were the one who left that message on my Talk page.

Bhai,

When did I say that Jehlum is in Poonch? When did I say that Alexander came to Poonch? (Read what I wrote carefully.) And regarding the Punjabis, you must know that when Poonch was annexed by Runjeet Singh, and later when it was given to Raja Moti Singh, many Punjabis were brought here. My family is one of them.

I know the facts I need to know. I started this page and someone redirects the Poonch(Rawalakot) page to this one and edits as per his/her likings!? If that was you and you want to write some thing about the history and developments of AJK's Poonch, you are free to do that, provided that you do it at the right place.

Regards.

License tagging for Image:100 0891.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:100 0891.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:04, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Cisco Field.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Cisco Field.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. If you have not already done so, please also include the source of the image. In many cases this will be the website where you found it.

Please specify the copyright information and source on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sotpqw 16:31, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:100 1147.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:100 1147.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:04, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Sudhun[edit]

Hi, I noticed an article that you have helped to create called Sudhun. Can you provide any sources of information about this group? From the article, I am having a difficult time understanding what it is supposed to be about and most of the references to "Sudhun" that I find when performing a web search are either links to this article or are somebody's last name. Please note that Wikipedia content should be verifiable. In other words, you should give reliable sources for information that you add to articles. Thank you. --BigDT 03:21, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you read the last part of the article it has about 20 references about the tribe. it is a tribe in Kashmir with about 500,000 members. Its members are also listed. I hope this helps. trueblood 03:23, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The "references" section mentions several people who were or are members of this tribe. None of the four "external links" seem to be related to this tribe. When an article cites its sources, or references, this means that you should give the websites, books, newspapers, magazines, etc, from which you obtained the information given in the article. Where did the information in the article come from? Do you have a website that I could visit that would give me information about this tribe? Thanks. --BigDT 03:28, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You can get the article about this tribe from :Modern academic studies that mention the Sudhans include Alexander Evans's 2005 article in Asian Affairs: http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/routledg/raaf/2005/00000036/00000001/art00003

Also the Official government of Azad Kashmir website has references to this tribes district it is called Sudnuti. Also see Poonch. thanks

trueblood 03:31, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also see http://www.saag.org/papers3/paper286.html

the references are to Gen Aziz who was a General in Pak Army and is a member of the tribe. By the way I am also member of this tribe. So believe me it is not a hoax.

Quote from the article on above web site: After a series of consultations with the National Security Council (NSC), some of his Corps Commanders and his kitchen Cabinet, Gen. Musharraf has reportedly decided to send Major Gen Mohammad Anwar Khan, who belongs to the powerful Sudhan tribe and is a resident of Tain village in district Poonch, which is also the home village of the Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir (POK) Legislative Assembly Speaker Sardar Siab Khalid, to Muzaffarabad to be "elected" on August 1 as the so-called President of the POK on the ticket of the Muslim Conference allied to the Pakistan Muslim League (PML) of Nawaz Sharif, now living in exile in Saudi Arabia.

Ok ... thank you ... you have helped to allay my concerns. I would strongly suggest cleaning the article up some. Also, with respect to the pictures, in general, unless there is something important about all of the people depicted, the article probably doesn't need that many pictures. Thank you. --BigDT 03:40, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your help is appreciated. Will keep in mind

trueblood 03:41, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I also created a new articel Islamic Cults maybe you can look at it also ?

trueblood 03:45, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

reply[edit]

look at why he was blocked, you'll see.--Urthogie 02:37, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is linked from the block message.--Urthogie 04:17, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Help[edit]

Unfortunately I am not familiar with this term. I have a friend from Pakistan that I may be able to ask one of these days. Depending if she is not too busy with college and checks her email. If not, my apologies for not being to help.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 04:13, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I must apologize but I really am not familiar with Islam unfortunately. I'm too Californianized for my own good. However as far as Persian culture, I might be able to help a bit more. But in regards to practicing the Muslim faith, I do not possess a strong enough knowledge of it.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 04:18, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help[edit]

Can you please help on the following by entering the dicussion.

Aga Khani Islamic Cults

In India and Pakistan the followers of Aga Khan are known as Aga Khani so I need you help on this, secondly as in India where Rajneesh had a cult there are many Islamic cults and I need your help on that as well.

Can you join in the discussion

trueblood 04:34, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nice meeting you. I also thank you for your message. I have heard about Aga Khani and have read some articles about him but I do not have deep understanding of the matter you are talking about. I think you may please contact some other editor who may be knowledgeable about this matter. Regards. --Bhadani 05:06, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah here in Pakistan(sepcially Karachi) ,many Agha Khani live.i have friend he is Agha Khani (some times some ppls use Ismali term for them i do nt knw why). Aghan Hosptial staff are 99% aghani khani.

Khalidkhoso 06:16, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

check i have written more sects in Islamic Cults.

I've just tried to make the article more NPOV (at least at the intro). A lot of work should be done and bringing reliable sources is necessary. -- Szvest - ^{Wiki me up ®} 10:04, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Ref. your note: the term Aga Khani literally means of Aga Khan. A rough translation would be Followers of Aga Khan. Though I don't konw much about the sect, you can rest assured that it exists. The other term used to describe the members of the sect is Ismaili. I am not sure if Aga Khani sect is an offshoot/part of Ismaili sect or not. Sorry for not beung much help. I'll post more if I find more about it. Mahalo --Vikas Kumar Ojha _{Talk to me!} 16:32, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. ref. your note, I have updated the above comment with a confirmation from one of my muslim friends and posted it on the Afd discussion page. I would suggest you to expand the article a little and search a few more reliable sources/citations on web. I personally do not have an opinion so would like to remain nuetral. Let me know if you need any help. Mahalo! --Vikas Kumar Ojha _{Talk to me!} 23:14, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Sorry for the late response. This is ref. your note about putting my comments on preloaded discussion page. If you mean the Afd discussion page, I put my comments there. If you mean the article discussion (talk) page, wide this edit someone already pasted my comment there. Thanks! --Vikas Kumar Ojha _{Talk to me!} 07:15, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RFCN[edit]

Please be aware that I have removed your comment regarding User:Aylahs from this page, as the page is not intended to serve this function. If you believe a user to be using multiple accounts in bad faith, please report the issue at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser. If the situation is particularly urgent, please consider reporting the issue at WP:AN/I. Crimsone 04:51, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent request for checkuser[edit]

You recently compiled and listed a case at requests for checkuser. For an outcome to be achieved, we require you list the code letter which matches with the violations of policy, which is listed at the top of the requests for checkuser page. This has been implemented to reduce difficulties for checkusers, and is essential for your case to be processed. Also, a checkuser or clerk has requested you supply one or more diffs to justify the use of the checkuser procedure in the case. A link to your recently-created case which has this information missing is here. Thanks for your co-operation. Daniel.Bryant ^{[ T · C ]} 05:28, 12 January 2007 (UTC), checkuser clerk.[reply]

Don't look like a vandal. Please provide an edit summary when you edit.[edit]

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. Will (Talk - contribs) 05:50, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion of Islamic Cults[edit]

I am willing to discuss this issue with, but I am swamped right now with a real life project. I hope to be back on Wikipedia by the 15th. Sorry, and good luck. -Eliyahu S ^Talk 21:02, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sudhun[edit]

Hi there, thank you for your message. Unfortunately, this is a recurrent theme here on wikipedia. With so many contributers with their opinions etc. it is hard to get the job done. Only an admin can block a user or lock a page. Here is the best process to follow in preparation to inviting an admin.

1. Invite the discussion on the discussion board and invite all users for it.

2. Offer your opinion and state your case with referenced sources and distinguish your opinions from these sources (opinions are not allowed in an encyclopedia. But if they are reflective of a cited reference from any publication or literary source, then by all means include it with a footnote etc)

3. Set up a disputed tag (I will try and set this up for you) and invite wiki admins through arbcom to come and help mediate this matter, as long as all parties are amicable and respectful.

4. Stay focussed and committed. Don't lose hope and don't get pulled into futile arguments and personal abuse, as it will either stress you out more or get you banned. Worst of all, the Sudhun article will still remain unfinished.

Hope that helps. Good luck True Blood786.--Raja 16:44, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

sock puppets[edit]

I have invited the user Sudozai to discuss the issue as he doesn't appear to be a sockpuppet.

The other user Sadozai Khan is clearly the Leeds sock puppet and only appeared on the scene after I retorted his points (very typical of him to try and evade detection). He has been warned and put up on to the sock puppet account. Now go ahead and make the changes on the article that will incorporate all views in a neutral and healthy way. Hope that helps.--Raja 11:58, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reference tags[edit]

I have replied to your question on the Sudhun talk page under the Reference tags header. It's simple, but you mjust always add the full info of the source you quote, i.e. The name of the book, the author, year of Publish, Publish house and copyright date, and the page numbers.

Type in < ref > at the beginning of your reference and at the end of it you would type < / Ref >

e.g.;

The Sudhans are a Brahmin tribe < ref > The name of the book, author, date of copyright and publishing house, page number < / ref >

Important: remove the spaces between the ref templates otherwise it wont work. I have added spaces in between the arrows because the system wont allow me to show you otherwise. Try it a few times, you will definitely get used to it.--Raja 14:31, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Local info re Sudhun[edit]

I have got in touch with some of the elders and their contacts in Rawalpindi, Kahuta who know Sudhans very well from there.

I can now see your frustration. All the elders were unanimous that the Sudhuns, althoguh quite a respectable and military tribe also, are definitely not Pathan at all, neither have they heard of such an assertion has been made by them. They say that the Sudhan titles are Sardar, whilst some very remotely also call themselves Raja and claim a Rajput ancestry (consist with your claims re Glossary of Tribes etc)

Another point here is a very interesting one also. Apparently Sudhans are well established near them in Rawalpindi and hold some decent land. This would be very strange for them to be this well established in such a short period within the Sadozai conquer of the area and the subsequent Sikh empire ovethrow. Logistically and plausibility would be against the Pathan origin point. The Sudhans of Rawalpindi have extensive relations with Kashmir which would make sense that they are one and the same tribe as we are discussing here.

I have the Rawalpindi Gazzetteer with me and I will check it up for you for any references to do with your tribe in there.

In the meantime, keep up the work.--Raja 20:04, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

trueblood 05:17, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Image-42759847 pmush ap203.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:42759847 pmush ap203.jpg. The copy called Image:42759847 pmush ap203.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 20:47, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shaukat Aziz[edit]

You wrote the following phrase: "Thus Mr. Aziz was nothing but a local office manager and later money laundering kingpin laundering money for corrupt officials form third world countries." How is that not a POV statement? PBP 03:27, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I agree with you on that but the rest was no POV, dont you agree.

trueblood 03:53, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:ReharaHills.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:ReharaHills.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:08, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Warning[edit]

Stop adding rhetorical nonsense to the Pakistan Army article. If you continue to do this, your account will be frozen and you will be banned. Mercenary2k 04:15, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you wanna go for the mediator. Go for it. But with your checkered history of vandalism, you dont have a good chance of your rhetoric becoming part of wikipedia. Mercenary2k 04:24, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All of what I wrote about the ISI is backed by facts and properly cited. Just what exactly is in dispute? please tell me. don't make grandiose statements. I can obviously tell you are someone who hates Pakistan. Wikipedia is not a place to vent out rage and frustration. If you wanna do that against Pakistan, I suggest you go start a blog.Mercenary2k 04:29, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistan Army[edit]

Hi Trueblood,

As always, I suggest that you work with the people you have trouble with, try and reach a consensus. I dont have much time right now, but I will Inshallah try my best for you guys to calm and talk in agreement, with peaceful debate. Remember, we all read the same Qalima guys, let's be neutral and informative. This is an encyclopedia, but not the be all and end all of all things knowledge.

I suggest you open the debate on the discussion page and we'll take things from there.--Raja 00:06, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stop It[edit]

Look, stop editing the Pakistan Army page repeatedly to insert negative and incorrect information. The PA did not lose 7000 men in the Kargil conflict, and even though the real figure is much, much lower, it is still not conclusively known. Therefore, it is best to omit mention of the casualty count in the main PA article. If you have a look at the US Army page, you will realize that it does not list the casualty count of the American soldiers for wars they fought in the main article, and I'd like to keep the same format for the Pakistan Army article.

And why are you so bent upon posting pictures of captured Pakistani troops and the surrender photograph on the PA page? I have pictures of captured Indian troops from the various wars, I don't go around pasting them on the Indian Army page, so please STOP. Stop your attempts to besmirch the Pakistan Army. Nobody will let you put up a picture of an American humvee being blown to bits in Iraq by an IED on the US Army page, and we don't want you to post pictures displaying Indian victories on our Army's page. The German army article dosen't have pictures of Wehrmact soldiers lying dead on the streets of Berlin. Get my point? Zaindy87 18:02, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I must agree on this point. In fact, I am quite surprised at what I am reading trueblood. I did my best for your Sudhan article in light of the vandalism on there, and you appeared quite capable most of that duration, to work with the scope of wiki in this respect. I request that the same consideration be given here.

Before you reply, my reasons for believing the above points by Zaindy are that I can see you have not added any info other than negative info regarding the subject. Surely the sources you have consulted must have some balanced info? You can argue POV etc, but the behaviour is indicative of POV. Also some of your comments towards Pakistanis being referred to as Pakis (and that it is the acceptable norm in US) is also surprising, especially in the sense that Bush's aide retracted the point and never tried justifying it. Also personal uncited info regarding people on wiki is liable to legal action wiki and also in bad taste for it's repute. Whatever your feelings towards your neighbouring nation, have some respect for your fellow Musalmaans from there and try to be a little more civil.

I dont want to go further into the sock puppetry route (I trust you understand what I mean, without making further points and others understanding), so let's have a fresh beginning and try to work together. Especially as the personal interest to you, no doubt, would be that many Sudhan's are actually soldiers and high ranking officers of the Pakistan Army also. Hence if pedantic reasoning is to be applied, then this info should also be included. (Like I said, let's not go there, and instead work together in civility).

I apologise if I said something to hurt you lil bro, I just dont want to see a decent user make mistakes and get caught up in a mess. It can be a pain on wiki sometimes, trust me I know. I dont believe in just telling friends where they are right, I also believe in being a critical friend too. If you understand what I have said, and respect it, you will value friendships all the more bro.--Raja 23:32, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image of ISI HQ[edit]

You sure thats the image of the parliament building?

This is the site where I got it from....

http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/entity.jsp?entity=pakistan_directorate_for_inter-services_intelligence

Mercenary2k 19:09, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok man ok. I beleive you. Thats why I have not re-instered the image. Mercenary2k 03:34, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

About user[edit]

The user, Zaindy has already been uploading multiple copyvio images and falsely tagging it as fair use and believe it or not even CC. Im therefore requesting all his photos be deleted and the user be banned for violating WP copyrights policy including falsification of tags. Idleguy 04:14, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you kindly provide with his other usernames which are suspected to be his? It would help a lot. Thanks Idleguy 05:09, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Wayne Stout[edit]

A tag has been placed on Wayne Stout, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Pointe LaRoche 05:26, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:100_1064.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:100_1064.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:39, 24 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 09:39, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cisco Utah[edit]

Emergy Telecom is the rural phone company that serves Greenriver, Utah, Price Utah and Cisco. So before you make allegations check the phone book.

see the website http://www.etv.net/

trueblood 05:16, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Except for the website you link is for "Emery Telcom" (no G). Emergy Telcom, which you insist in linking to Cisco does not exist 75.141.208.84 07:35, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Had you properly sourced the article, then this wouldn't have happened, I would have discovered the mispelling and fixed it myself. When there are no sources, I'm left alone with my search engine, and sometimes that doesn't always arrive at the right answer. But while we're at it, you're going to need to do a far better job of sourcing the article. I cannot find any sources confirming that Wayne Stout and Tariq Imran Ahmad own the town. I cannot find any sources that prove that Emery Telecom put a T1 line into Cisco, and that they would soon be providing high speed internet. You say that the well in town is Gibraltar No. 1, but the government thinks that the name is "Gibralter" [1] (page 10). Thats not to say that all this isn't true, and that there are plenty of sources to support it, its just that I can't find any. I'm going to add fact tags to these items in the article, but if they're not taken care of in a reasonable amount of time, then likely somebody will remove them. Thank you. - CosmicPenguin (Talk) 13:56, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Satview.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Satview.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:12, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sex scandal supreme court of pakistan[edit]

I have read that article and many article discussing that.Although i do not doubt the cabaility of ISI to indulge in such low level activities we should quote "exactly"what the article says. No.1.The article does not mention oath under PCO,it is all about the decision on Musharraf's uniform,seocndly the language used in the article can be a guideline to what is posted.Secondly the article mentions no sources,it might be or might not be accruate.No.3.It mentions no name,so if you put it on dogar's page you should mention the reason it is there.. [[2]]

Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry[edit]

With at least eight reverts in the past three days, it appears that an edit war is brewing over the Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry article. Rather than continue to revert other editors, please discuss your concerns on the talk page in order to build consensus first. If people keep reverting each other, I may be forced to protect the article. --Kralizec! (talk) 02:43, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Pakistan Army, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. SMS ^Talk 05:54, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Pacific Energy & Mining Company"[edit]

A page you created, Pacific Energy & Mining Company, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how it is important or significant, and thus why it should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for companies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thanks. Livitup (talk) 05:09, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Trueblood786. You have new messages at Livitup's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

July 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The project's content policies require that all articles be written from a neutral point of view, and not introduce bias or give undue weight to viewpoints. Please bear this in mind when making edits such as your recent edit to Cisco, Utah. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. RainbowOfLight ^Talk 04:50, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Pacific Energy and Mining[edit]

Unfortunately, the article was only four sentences long and did not assert notability. I checked the article's history to see when it was created before I deleted it (it had been eight hours with no updates). You are welcome to re-create it with a minimum assertion of notability. ... discospinster _talk 15:13, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:SPE Certified Petroleum Professional[edit]

To be frank, the article does come off as a bit advert-y (e.g. "Ever wonder how you would handle an "ethical" situation?...") Furthermore, the tag that User:RayAYang has added is only a notice to let editors know that the article needs independent sources (that is, from somewhere other than the SPE's own site. So his adding the tag is not really vandalism.

What you should do is find some substantial mentions of the programme in other sources (not just passing mentions). And don't worry if someone puts a maintenance tag on the article; it's not to denigrate the article, just to get others to help in writing it. Regards, ... discospinster _talk 22:39, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Satview Broadband Ltd[edit]

Hi. Thanks for letting me know of this situation. The offending edit was made on June 30; I don't think it would make a difference to block him/her now, as the IP is probably being used by someone else now. Semi-protecting the article so that only logged-in users can edit would be undertaken only if the article was subjected to continuous IP vandalism. So at this point I'm afraid there's not much that can be done. I will place the article on my watch list and keep an eye on the IP. ... discospinster _talk 03:46, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008[edit]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Abdul Hameed Dogar. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. -- Jeandré, 2008-08-16t12:53z 12:53, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reply.

I was referring to [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] - all unsourced. [10]'s source, (correct URL) doesn't mention Dogar. -- Jeandré, 2008-08-19t12:36z

Please provide diffs for sources put in the article before 2008-08-16t12:53z. -- Jeandré, 2008-08-19t12:38z

Speedy deletion nomination of Tin Cup Oil Field[edit]

A tag has been placed on Tin Cup Oil Field requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Laaa200 (talk) 02:22, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine, but an article needs a lot more than a declarative statement. It was tagged both by a bot and a live user as too short for inclusion. I'm certain the subject is notable, but it'll be up to you to establish that beyond the location. :) Hope this helps. PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:35, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. The nice thing about this site is that you don't need to create a placeholder. I'm looking forward to seeing the new article! Regards, --PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:38, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Tin Cup 1-35 Water Injection Well 631.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Tin Cup 1-35 Water Injection Well 631.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:06, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Tin cup crossa section.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Tin cup crossa section.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:06, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Pervez Musharraf, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Even so, he still was a president of Pakistan, so the infobox has to stay. Discuss first in the talk page if appropriate. CardinalDan (talk) 04:20, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Pervez Musharraf. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. CardinalDan (talk) 04:31, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ngensolutions LLC for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Ngensolutions LLC, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ngensolutions LLC until a concensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 03:56, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Desert Creek Isopach squaw canyon.pdf[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Desert Creek Isopach squaw canyon.pdf. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:07, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Trueblood786. You have new messages at Zachlipton's talk page.
Message added 01:20, 28 December 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Trueblood786/Greenriver[edit]

User:Trueblood786/Greenriver, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Trueblood786/Greenriver and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Trueblood786/Greenriver during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. trueblood (talk) 04:08, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

re Benjamin Barber[edit]

Hello, Trueblood786. You have new messages at AndyTheGrump's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Please be aware that you may be in violation of the three revert rule for your edits at Benjamin Barber. Please refrain from adding unsourced attack material and accept the guidance of editors familiar with reliable sourcing and neutraility requirements that this material cannot be added to the article in its current form. Jonathanwallace (talk) 06:08, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Raw (2).jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Raw (2).jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:33, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Raw (7).jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Raw (7).jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:33, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Raw.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Raw.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:34, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Ghulam Ahmad by Khalida Yasmin.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Ghulam Ahmad by Khalida Yasmin.jpg, which you've sourced to Dr. Khalida Yasmin. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:53, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ghulam Ahmad by Khalida Yasmin.jpg[edit]

Thank you for your note, I however put the wrong license, this material was created by me and posted my me, can you please put it back on and give it the free license. Please reply on my page.

EagleEye (talk) 20:44, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I was totally confused by this history. As I see it...

It's a photo of a photograph - shown by the colours and the rounded corners in first upload.
Name is "File:2006-06-23-2035-35 edited.jpg" and text "Photograph Ghulam Ahmad. Photo by Tariq Ahmad" added by yourself when you uploaded the image. Title agrees with upload date.
Then In IP wanders in and we get "Photograph Ghulam Ahmad. Photo by Dr. Khalida Yasmin"
An editor asks for cropping and changes the text to "Photograph of Ghulam Ahmad. Photo by Dr. Khalida Yasmin"
An Editor crops the picture
Another one renames it to File:Ghulam Ahmad by Khalida Yasmin.jpg
I arrived to move the image to commons (as all free images are moving) and see no relationshop between any of the names, and know if I moved it to commons it wouldn't last 10 minutes.

So was the original photo taken by Tariq Ahmad, Khalida Yasmin, or User:Trueblood786? And what is the approximate date? I don't care who took the picture of the picture - it's not relevant in copyrght law - copyright cannot be removed from the original image by taking a subsequent photo of it - we need to know who owns the copyright (if any) now. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:23, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the confusion, the photo was taken by Trueblood. And I gave the permission,please reply to my page EagleEye (talk) 22:52, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's still not clear - you are Trueblood, did you give yourself permission??? And did you take the original? Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:55, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I am trueblood, Thanks

You are still not answering the question Who took the original photograph and when?. We cannot restore a photograph of an old photo with the correct information. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 01:15, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I took the photograph in 1979 in Pakistan. I will appreciate if you would have told me where you put the photo, so I could have given given the proper license, as I have not been on Wikpedia for a while, I probably did not see the message if you had sent one EagleEye (talk) 05:11, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

It's deleted, you can't see it (I can). I will sort it out now - you can now find it tidied up at File:Ghulam Ahmad.JPG. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 13:14, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sardar Muhammad Yaqoob Khan[edit]

You have also deleted Sardar Muhammad Yaqoob Khan from notable people's section of Rawalakot giving the reason that he is from Bagh? I must say your knowledge is very poor and you made a poor judgement by removing his name. He is from Ali Sojal, look at this source http://www.ajk.gov.pk/. You also accused me of deleting material from rawalakot page, would you like to point me out the part I deleted except some junk kind of advertisement I cleaned. You also said you are developing this page, I can see the quality of this page. I am from the same district and literally know everyone in azad kashmir. If you have spare time, kindly make this page look good by trying to improve language and different sections. I am developing the page Tatrinote you can look at the quality of both pages though I need lot more to do on that page. Thanksriz 13:50, 12 February 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Riztech (talk • contribs)

Nomination of Daily Dharti Rawalakot for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daily Dharti Rawalakot is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daily Dharti Rawalakot until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. riz 13:55, 12 February 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Riztech (talk • contribs)

Hello, Trueblood786. You have new messages at Talk:Ghulam Ahmad.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Also see Ghulam Ahmad and Rawalakot Jim1138 (talk) 18:30, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notability[edit]

I would say, IMO, that the article on Ghulam Ahmad meets Wikipedia:Notability. You might want to check the references as some of them are dead. The tags (factual accuracy) and (involvement of relative) probably should stay for now. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 19:38, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Trueblood786. You have new messages at Jim1138's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Thanks Sudhan1216 (talk) 23:56, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012[edit]

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism, as you did to Rawalakot, will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. Your recent disruptive edits in notable person's section of Rawalakot page constitute act of vandalism. As explained earlier Ghulam Ahmad do not meet the standards of notable person and it would be naive to add him again and again and disrupt the page. riz 04:00, 13 February 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Riztech (talk • contribs)

You are not an adminstrator so stop threatening

EagleEye 04:20, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Trueblood786. You have new messages at Jim1138's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

World war II fighter pilot[edit]

The item that I find most interesting about Ghulam Ahmad. It seems unusual to have been a WWII fighter pilot. IMHO, I find that more notable than being president of some state. Is there more information on his service? BTW: would you please sign your talk with four tildes ~~~~? It is hard to reply if you don't. Thanks Jim1138 (talk) 20:53, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that Ghulam Ahmad's name was added yesterday by Trueblood786 on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No._1_Squadron,_Indian_Air_Force in "Burma campaign" section which I pointed out earlier, does not even cohere with rest of the paragraphs (although Trueblood786 made an effort again) and an image "Ground Subject Cup RIAF" which was basically awarded to ground staff of airforce, tells how credible this page is. This could further be substanciated by him joing Forest Services after the worldwar II when there was severe shortage of technical people in India especially after the partition of Inid/pakistan. As climed on his wiki page, he migrated to Pakistan after partition and joined "Forest Services", it is hard to believe a fighter pilot will leave his position and join forest services especially when new born pakistan was severely short of pilots. I therefore, recommend the editing of this section to enable the wikipedia viewers to read true histroy. riz 05:27, 15 February 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Riztech (talk • contribs)

Hi brother![edit]

We are long lost brothers! the proof Cheers, Bro! Jim1138 (talk) 09:33, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Brother[edit]

Nice to meet you brother. We should thank Riztech for making our family whole again.

EagleEye 15:47, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Ghulam Ahmad[edit]

Are you using multiple ids on wikipedia? Who are you really? Just found out by Jim1138 that EagleEye and Trueblood786 are same person using two ids on wikipedia. So you Trueblood786, were playing game. I was commenting on Ghulam Ahmad and from no where you were jumping in, accusing me to edit your work and I was confused asking myself where did this person come from.

I have a question for Jim1138 as well, is there anyway to check the gender of a wiki member here, how do you know "he is she"?

Trueblood786 is from colorado as per his information on his user profile page, somehow Ghulam Ahmad is also linked with colorado, doing ph.d there, so it is evident Trueblood786 is Ghulam Ahmad's sibling and most of the contributions on his page are from her which do not reflect truth and neutrality especially the section "Philanthropy" where it sates as I quote "He gave scholarships for education of residents of Poonch District, particularly members of the Sudhan tribe, resulting in hundreds of graduates in engineering and medicine", can someone give me names and contact details of 5 students whom he gave scholarships and they became doctors and engineers? (obviously doctors will have their name on PMDC and engineers on PEC) I can provide you direct contact numbers of Legislative Assemby Members from Rawalakot area including president of Azad Kashmir. As claimed by page writer if Ghulam Ahmad gave hundreds of scholarships resulting hundreds of medical doctors and engineers, everyone including president of Azad Kashmir (as they are from same area) will vouch for him. What do you say EagleEye or Trueblood786?.

And who should be banned from wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Riztech (talk • contribs) 05:08, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man you can an ID and a psynomyn, so Trueblood is the ID and Eagle is the psynomn, so I am not sure what you are gettting at. Why dont you do that and maybe give me your name and phone number and we can talk. Why are you taking all this so personally. First you state that myself and Jim are brothers, and now you are all upset. Take it easy. BTW I do know Yaqub and maybe you can call him if you know him and ask him about Ghulam Ahmad. Good luck

BTW I did not add the section on the schlorships, so I cannot comment on that, all I can say is that I know for a fact that scholorships have been given. In fact if you were to study the history of the area you would realize, that Sardar Ibrahim, Ghulam Ahmad, General Rahim, Col. Tasadaq all went to school togeather in Poonch as that was the only school. In fact Poonch area produced a lot of good people, including the above, in addition the elder brother of General Rahim was the Secretary of Forests in Pakistan along with Ghulam Ahmad who was Chief Conservator of Forests. It has been due to the efforts of these people that young men like you have been educated and can debate. I am really glad that you are asking questions, because you should never take anything for granted. But as you said you should call Yaqoub or Sardar Qayum, they will verify this. Sardar Qayum is the same age, however Yaqoub is much younger, he would not know anything about pre partition, however he does know Ghulam Ahmad and his sons.

Thanks for your comments

EagleEye 16:14, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

EagleEye (talk) 17:22, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Got your point on signing with different nick, I must admit, I did not know this and I was confused with Trueblood786 and EagleEye. Coming back to the point of Jim and you (brother), since he was insisting to add Ghulam Ahmad in notable section and the way he was arguing without giving any reason to add his name there I had this impression. whether it was misjudgement or I oversighted facts, I accept my responsibility on this part and won't insist again for that relation.

Re scholarships: whoever put that information of hundreds of scholarships, you would agree that it was simply exaggeration so it must be corrected. I am sure Ghulam Ahmad had done nice things in life and he would not want (if alive) to be linked with such claims. There are lot of poor students in Rawalakot and it would be nice to help them. Nothing personal here but look at your posts, twice you suggested to ban me, and reason was why I edited notable section. I know almost all prominent people of poonch but all of them are not notable and should not be in that section. I am sure sardar qayum and sardar yagoob know Ghulam Ahmad but my point here was for the number of scholarships someone claimed on his page. I added Sardar yaqoob's name as notable person (which he qualifies as ex pm and know president of AJK), while you took his name off, I accept it due to the reason that he is from ali sojal which is a bit far from rawalakot. I was initially considering Rawalakot page as district headquarter but now since its boundaries are set as a town, I have no objection erasing names of yaqoob, general aziz etc. Glad you made a right decision.

Again nothing personal, probably reason we argue most is due to two three different talk pages, I put something on one page (may be lenient views) but when see hard view on other page, reply there. Same is with you, on one page you give lenient views and on other you suggest to ban me. So better to stick to one talk page and we can come up to a concensus. Thanks. riz 09:25, 16 February 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Riztech (talk • contribs)

A kitten for you![edit]

Hope you like it.

riz 03:27, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Photo algal mound (1).pdf missing description details[edit]

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Photo algal mound (1).pdf

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 10:23, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 22[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Satview Broadband, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Springfield, Espanola and Las Animas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation[edit]

Your upload of File:Bazaar Rawalakot.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:00, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Cisco Yellow House with 1932 rig.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:48, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Cisco Oil Well, Utah.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:49, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 21[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sudhan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bagh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Sudhan. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. SMS ^Talk 09:39, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did on User talk:Sitush. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Such claims of someone "owning a site" are unwarranted and threaten our goal of collaborative editing. Please don't make such claims lightly. Drmies (talk) 05:41, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Daily Dharti Rawalakot for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daily Dharti Rawalakot is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daily Dharti Rawalakot (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SMS ^Talk 19:23, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Daily Dharti AJK is the only newspaper published in Rawalakot, this area has a population of over 50000 so if a US news paper in Fort Collins is notable why wont this paper

Trueblood (talk) 01:28, 28 February 2014 (UTC) Trueblood (talk) 02:02, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- SMS ^Talk 21:30, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for unrepentant meatpuppetry threats, racist remarks, and personal attacks. See ANI thread here. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | talk 23:02, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Trueblood786 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that I was blocked for using language which was not civil and for calling the two editors names, and i agree that wont happen. I apologize. Over the last couple of years, everytime I have visited this article, I have left comments for discussion, however, the two editors here have disagreed with the news paper articles and websites and objected to both. I think that is unfair, Indian news papers concerning sudhans are independent, especially as they have nothing to do with this tribe. So if independent news sources are not reliable than what is reliable, only something written in NYT. Finally, as I said I wont make personal attacks, and will help in making this a better article. I do take issue with the fact that some editor put this as an indian and Pakistan page, which it is not, it is about a tribe in Kashmir which is probably from Afghanistan. That section should be removed. As I said I will strive to make this a better article with sources which are verifiable. Also the reference to having sudhans look at an article which refers to them is only fair. All I did was contact there organization and ask them to look at what is being written about them, that is only fair. I will appreciate if I am unblocked Trueblood (talk) 01:03, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

While there's progress being made here, the personal attacks were only part of why you were blocked. The other half was threatening meatpuppetry, and you clearly still don't understand how that's a problem. "Contacting [an] organization" to "look at what is being written", when it's clear you expect the organization's members to edit the article to reflect The Truth, is still recruiting editors to edit an article in a particular fashion, and that is meatpuppetry. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:37, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Trueblood, I recommend you read Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks before requesting to be unblocked again. You must acknowledge what you did that was incorrect, take responsibility for your actions and demonstrate that you will not repeat this same behavior. Blaming other editors or going off on tangents about content issues (why this article is an exception to the rules) will result in your appeal being denied. This block isn't about what other editors have done or what this article says or doesn't say, it's about you. Your behavior should be the only subject you talk about in a block appeal. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:46, 1 March 2014 (UTC) I admit what I did was improper. and it wont happen again. Trueblood (talk) 02:32, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Trueblood786 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have read the policy for appealing a block. I admit that I my behavior was wrong, and take full responsibility for my actions, I was completely wrong when I used racial epithets and said that I will ask Sudhans to review the site, that was uncalled for. I will not do this again. Trueblood (talk) 17:10, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I've spoken with the blocking administrator, and she does not object to my unblocking you. You have explained that you understand what you did was wrong, and will not repeat the actions. If you do, you can and will be reblocked, and if you are blocked again it is unlikely that you will find an administrator willing to trust you enough to unblock you again. Show the community that you mean what you've said in your unblock appeals. -- Atama頭 22:44, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think that your unblock request is compelling here, which is why I haven't declined it. What I'd like to know, though, is not just what you won't do if unblocked, but what you will do if unblocked. You can answer below me, thank you. Please try to be specific in your answer. -- Atama頭 19:14, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking the time to read my request, I will edit articles that I personally have knowledge about and quote independent verifiable sources. I won't get into arguments which waste everyone's time. I will be productive. I will be unbiased

Trueblood (talk) 22:52, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocking admin Bishonen specifically pointed at "unrepentant meatpuppetry threats, racist remarks, and personal attacks". I do not see that addressed here. Drmies (talk) 17:55, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't gotten around to discussing this with Bishonen yet (I would not unblock before that, at the very least). I think that the above was addressed by the following statements:

"I understand that I was blocked for using language which was not civil and for calling the two editors names, and i agree that wont happen. I apologize."
"I admit that I my behavior was wrong, and take full responsibility for my actions, I was completely wrong when I used racial epithets and said that I will ask Sudhans to review the site, that was uncalled for."

So, an acknowledgement of "using language that was not civil", and "calling the two editors names", and "racial epithets" addresses the racist remarks and personal attacks. Saying "said that I will ask Sudhans to review the site, that was uncalled for" addresses the meatpuppetry threat. -- Atama頭 20:05, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ah--I just looked at the currently open request. Thanks for setting me straight, Atama. Drmies (talk) 22:49, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No worries Drmies. Oddly enough, I'm still working to clean up SPI (which is finally looking manageable) and came across this SPI case. I wish that the SPI template had been added to this talk page so that I'd have been aware, I probably would have held off on unblocking pending CU results. As it is, I'm watching that page to see what happens. At the very least, Trueblood786 is free to respond there. I'm going to actually add the SPI template on this page in a new section so that they're aware. -- Atama頭 22:53, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Trueblood786, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Atama頭 22:56, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have nothing to do with this whole issue, I had apologized and I don't know what else to do. If others in the office sign up for Wikipedia, I would think that is a good thing. Again, I have done nothing to deserve these accusations, I have made no changes and clearly I have apologized.

Trueblood (talk) 18:42, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

They did. Checkuser has technically tied you to one of the accounts that was used to support you, and to another account that was recently created but has not edited yet. Your apologies are meaningless if they are dishonest. I'm blocking you indefinitely, and blocking your sockpuppets as well. -- Atama頭 18:56, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have nothing to do with Adnan1216, the other user is a co-worker. So I am not sure why I am blocked again, I have made no changes as I was blocked. I again apologize, and request that I be unblocked.

Trueblood (talk) 19:03, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The evidence that these are all you is beyond convincing. NativeForeigner ^Talk 19:07, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I will appreciate if you would provide me the evidence that Adnan1216 is a sock puppet.

Trueblood (talk) 19:12, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Trueblood786 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

reason I have apologized, I apologize again, I am not sure what evidence is being used for Adnan1216. I will appreciate if you would reconsider your block. Trueblood (talk) 19:10, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"Technical evidence" usually means you were editing from the same IP, IP range, or a variety of other data that Checkusers (but no one else) can see. In other words, you've been caught red-handed. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:45, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'd appreciate it if a fellow CU would review the block, but I'm quite certain with my findings. NativeForeigner ^Talk 20:41, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(EC) Checkusers have access to identifying data admins do not have access to, and they are barred by the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy from revealing this data publicly. As such, only a Checkuser can assess a CheckUser evidence-based block. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 20:42, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Raw.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Raw.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 21:52, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nevada Petroleum Society[edit]

The article Nevada Petroleum Society has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication that subject meets WP:NORG notability guidelines.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jmertel23 (talk) 14:14, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ghulam Ahmad (forester) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ghulam Ahmad (forester) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghulam Ahmad (forester) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 08:28, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of KRRI-LD[edit]

The article KRRI-LD has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject does not meet the WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 23:45, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of KELM-LP[edit]

The article KELM-LP has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject does not meet the WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 20:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of KELM-LP for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article KELM-LP is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KELM-LP until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:47, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]