User talk:Truth1seeker

Welcome!

Hi, Truth1seeker. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Hitro talk 20:36, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Orrin Hatch has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Orrin Hatch was changed by Truth1seeker (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.943067 on 2014-01-03T20:36:51+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:36, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Orrin hatch

Hello, I guess you have left your comment on wrong talk page. This talk page has no article related to it, so it will be deleted soon. Regards. Hitro talk 20:37, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Truth1seeker. You have new messages at HitroMilanese's talk page.
Message added 20:44, 3 January 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hitro talk 20:44, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Robert J. Shelby. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Robert J. Shelby was changed by Truth1seeker (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.862288 on 2014-01-03T21:04:14+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:04, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Hitro:

Please tell me how I left an "unconstructive edit" that constitutes "vandalism" at Robert J Shelby?

In the previous sentence, it says that Hatch and Lee strongly supported his nomination. A sentence illustrating this is included by Lee. I added one by Hatch. How is this vandalism and unconstructive?

Talkback

Hello, Truth1seeker. You have new messages at HitroMilanese's talk page.
Message added 21:22, 3 January 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hitro talk 21:22, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:24, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Orrin Hatch shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Favonian (talk) 21:26, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 3 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Orrin Hatch page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Truth1seeker, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Truth1seeker! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:43, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]