User talk:Truth Seeker Alway

Welcome!

Hello, Truth Seeker Alway! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages.

Getting Started
Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Discord server • IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 15:45, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Hello, I'm Peaceray. I noticed that you recently removed content from Lingam without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You removed cited material without a clear explanation. Please consider the WP:Verifiability not truth essay, which states in a nut graph that Editors may not add content solely because they believe it is true, nor delete content they believe to be untrue, unless they have verified beforehand with a reliable source. As WP:BRD suggests, please discuss your proposed removal of cited material on the talk page & get consensus before attempting it again. Peaceray (talk) 15:49, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Lingam. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 15:50, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Lingam, you may be blocked from editing. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 06:20, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noone attacking the other editors. We need to evaluate the content of controversial scholars which has outdated authencity and not recognize in traditional scholars circle. We need to discuss dispute content before publishing it. Hope to agree to that part. Truth Seeker Alway (talk) 14:22, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:RS. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 16:55, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Truth Seeker Alway, please explain how Don't act like the typical white colonial supremacist, which was part of a comment you inserted here, should not be considered as a personal attack. Peaceray (talk) 18:28, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't state that he is white colonial supremacist but he acted consciously or subconsciously as white colonial supremacist. White colonial supremacist is not person attack but it's view hold by many supremacist as they think that they are one only entitled to made comment on other tradition even at cost of misreprentation of their tradition. Hope you understand that Truth Seeker Alway (talk) 10:45, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Lingam, you may be blocked from editing. Abecedare (talk) 14:40, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, we put aside the controversial part of article which based on the controversial writing deviating from the traditional sources of information before any discussion. Truth Seeker Alway (talk) 14:51, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Others have already pointed you to wikipedia core policies on reliable sourcing and neutral POV (see also WP:RPOV). Please stop your disruptive blanking of reliably sourced and relevant material from various article just because it doesn't mirror your personal understanding of "tradition" or you are likely to be blocked from editng on this project. Abecedare (talk) 15:05, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Citation is not from the reliable sources. Can you prove that the controversial scholars opinion held in objective way. It's just fringe opinion not proof. So better address the issues instead of avoiding the question. And it's not personal understanding of tadition it's approved by all traditional scholars of all related sampradaya. If you are able to cite thing in that primary source then I am happy to accept the thing. Truth Seeker Alway (talk) 04:14, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

One more revert, and I'll request you to be blocked. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 06:21, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Enough

@Abecedare: could you please block this account? Enough is enough diff. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 05:21, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Joshua Jonathan: Since I have previously edited Lingam, I am not taking any admin action on my own; have filed a report at ANI instead.

Truth Seeker Alway, you are welcome to respond at ANI if you wish. Abecedare (talk) 06:16, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 06:15, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WTF?? Who is the richard. And how do you attacked the other edictor with false claims without any evidence Truth Seeker Alway (talk) 16:26, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]