User talk:Tubesship
http://www.kosovathanksyou.com/ and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_recognition_of_Kosovo
To be continued! ;-) --Tubesship (talk) 08:34, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- I also don't think that Portugal will be recognizing Kosovo anytime soon. No consensus among politicians for that. Húsönd 11:23, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Administrator dab deleting my writings on article talk pages[edit]
Please take the time to review WP:TALK. I find your behaviour at Talk:Kosovo is in violation of these guidelines. Stay on topic and try to be constructive. Also, your continued allegations of "hate speech" and similar towards perfectly neutral and respected editors may be considered violating WP:NPA. Be advised that if you do not change your behaviour, your account may be blockable under Wikipedia:Disruption. dab (𒁳) 18:00, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
- Is it in rule of talkpage behaviour that you deleted my answer? I wrote: "No, it is not true, you are mixing up 2 countries as Kosovars worked togehter with the war crime tribunal but not the Serbs which still harbour Radovan Karadzic, Ratko Mladic and other suspected war criminals. Again, please stop your hate speech and your lying." --Tubesship (talk) 16:07, 25 March 2008 (UTC)" --Tubesship (talk) 18:05, 25 March 2008 (UTC) PS: Anonymous comments without signing will be deleted.
Administrator dab deleting my writings on my own talk page![edit]
you obviously refuse to accept the nature of Wikipedia. It is immaterial if pov-pushers at a given point in time have a "majority" on a particular talkpage. See Talk:Muhammad, there the driveby Muslim aniconists certainly form a majority at times. It is the same at Talk:Kosovo which may be dominated by editors taking the Albanian pov. Calls for revisions violating WP:NPOV are without consequence, and qualify as trolling or disruption. WP:NPOV is not only Wikipedia policy, it is also one of the non-negotiable core principles laid down by Jimbo Wales and could not even be overthrown if a majority of Wikipedians decided to do so. dab (𒁳) 10:36, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
- To be honest I cannot imagine someone more POVish than you are about Kosova and muslims at all. It seems that in your opinion all Muslims are all aniconic and Albanians are all nationalists. Tell me please, what have Kosovars done to you? Or Muslims? --Tubesship (talk) 10:38, 29 March 2008 (UTC)BTW: I would prefer if we could continue our discussion on your page. Thank you. --Tubesship (talk) 09:30, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- Mister Bachmann aka dab, won't you dare to delete again on my talk page!? What kind of administrator are you doing such an outrageous thing like deleting my own writings on my own talk page? Never ever again I said! And here is what you have deleted @12:24, 1 April 2008:
- Yes, this is the same opinion I have about Mr. Bachmann, aka dab as an administrator. Sad thing indeed. I do not know how I deserved his resentment.
- Hands off, please! Even if you are an administrator. --Tubesship (talk) 16:56, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Tube, dab has a history of trying to convince people to leave Wiki so that he can have it his way. Whatever you do, do not leave but try to contunue to work with him. I know its hard, but just quitting isn't going to get anything done but having dab monopolying the subject. Chaldean (talk) 14:55, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
- I have no "resentment against Albanians" as you are fond of implying all over the place. I have a resentment against pov-pushing and policy violation. Seeing that these have been your pursuits here, I may have a resentment against your disruptive editing. It figures that you translate this into "resentment against Albanians", seeing that you are trying to push Albanian nationalism. Know, then, that I would treat a Serbian pov-pusher exactly alike, and that I have in the past defended Wikipedia against all sorts of ethnic mysticist trolls, including Assyrian (this would be Chaldean's category), Armenian, Dutch, Hindutva, Iranian and others. I really couldn't care less about your ethnicity. Behave, and you are welcome to edit here. Misbehave, and you'll face sanctions. It also figures that Chaldean is trying to buddy up with you. He'll be happy to have you mess up the Albanian topics just as long as he is left to mess up the Assyrian topics. Wikipedia is not for people like him, or you. You should reconsider your approach or leave. dab (𒁳) 12:24, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- Call it what you want dab, but I just don't want somebody else to get hurt emotionally like I have, because of the things you say. And saying things like I can care lees about your ethnicity is such disrespectful thing to say. If you care less about the subject, then don't touch it at all. Give it to another admin who cares to keep an eye on POV and trolling. Chaldean (talk) 13:23, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Let me know if you need additional help. Chaldean (talk) 13:17, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Advice for pro-serbian talk page visitors[edit]
I hereby officially announce my support for the newborn state of Kosova and ask pro serbian visitors of my talk page to consider this before starting any debate about Kosova. Please do not try to convince me that Kosova is only a temporarily construct, or discuss the legality of Kosova, or that Ramush Haradinaj is guilty although he was acquitted of all charges, and such things. These attempts are futile, at least on my talk page. I thank you for your understanding.
Respectfully yours, --Tubesship (talk) 12:25, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
- ..."RoK is Kosova is RoK" is an idiotic mantra.... I am not saying the RoK is "temporary", it may be here to stay for all I know or care, but it ostensibly isn't synonymous with "Kosovo" in general, any more than the term "America" (since 1507) is synonymous with "USA" (since 1776). dab (𒁳) 16:46, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
- Please see the difference: The difference is, there are many countries in America (Canada, USA, Mexico...), but only one country in Kosova and that is the Republic of Kosova. I wrote it again and again, so you must be blinded by hate, if you do not see this difference I am repeating over and over and therefore please stay away from Albanian related articles if you hate Albanians so much that it makes you so blind to see this difference. To say Kosova is RoK is not an "idiotic mantra" like you say but it is a fact! And you are the only one denying this fact, therefore let me ask you what is your problem? --Tubesship (talk) 06:50, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Kosovo claims made by you[edit]
How can you claim that Kosovo was apartheid style rule similar to the Nazi Jewish apartheid? Didn't Albanians in Kosovo enjoy free medical care, University schoolin, among other programs such as Albanian state sponsored television?Mike Babic (talk) 18:49, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- I will tell you how: My mother was imprisoned in 1960 in Yugoslavia just because she wore a headscarf. This was the reason my family left this land - or better say, they fled. She was imprisoned only because she was a muslim, like Jews were imprisoned just because they were Jews. So don't tell me lies about how good the Albanians were treated. They were treated like second class citizens, or worse. Much worse. My mother never told anybody what she suffered during her 3 weeks in prison. Sometimes muteness can be louder than any scream. --Tubesship (talk) 18:59, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs[edit]
Hello Tubesship! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 944 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
- Edward J. Erickson - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:16, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of BSD-Movement[edit]
A tag has been placed on BSD-Movement requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
—Misspelling of BDS movement, see what BSD is or might be. de:BSD-Movement was guessed to be the work of the infamous de:Benutzer:Werddemer, see de:Benutzer_Diskussion:MBq/Archiv/2014#WL-Neuanlage durch Werddemer-SperrumgehungsIP. I guess it was yours, too. Cheers, Uwe Lück (talk) 06:46, 25 October 2017 (UTC)