User talk:Tunguuz

Octal[edit]

Dear Tunguuz. FYI, I have posted a question about your addition at Octal - the question is here.--Noe (talk) 21:42, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Peeter Laud for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peeter Laud is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peeter Laud until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Estopedist1 (talk) 10:33, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Morning! This anglo-american high-cultural beliberdah at the linked pages is too much to understand for non-elitist ppl. Plz somebody make a favor - say in plain Estonian (well, or in English), as to a under-educated robot, what should be improved with this article, a), b) and c). "WP:SIGCOV" has too many subtopics for occasional visitors to orient btw these.

To explain my initial (and seemingly naive) idea - to have information on certain Estonian cryptologists available at English Wikipedia as it currently is on Estonian one.

Tunguuz (talk) 17:58, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]