User talk:Tuxr
Tuxr, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Tuxr! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 21 March 2019 (UTC) |
March 2019
[edit]
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Kaushalendra Singh, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Please stop your disruptive editing. You are new to WP, but you should acquaint yourself with WP policies and procedures. Disruptive editing could get you banned from WP. Onel5969 TT me 00:41, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
If you think that article Kaushalendra Singh is approval on Wikipedia without improvement to adding some addtional citation. Then Only you are responsible in future issues after you will bane from Wp.
gaming the system
[edit]You made twenty rapid nonsense edits to User:Tuxr/sandbox. Please tell me what you think this accomplishes. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:31, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
[edit]
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Karanshrivastva, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Chris Troutman (talk) 16:59, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
But that user is changing the name of pages without permission as not any page removers or reviewers and have only around 200-300 edits. So is it right for do anything as! tuxr 17:06, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Notice of sockpuppetry block
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 21:19, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Why you had banned me from wikipedia. I'm not using multiple account. tuxr 17:45, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
If you will not unblock me then I will never use wikipedia. tuxr 17:49, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
At least give me one chance. tuxr 17:51, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
I will report you to another administrator and kick out from adminship. tuxr 17:52, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Tuxr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have no multiple account please give me at least one chance
Decline reason:
A simple denial is not enough, as every sockpuppeteer denies doing so. If you are not a sockpuppet, you will have to provide a plausible explanation as to why the evidence indicates that you are, if you are not. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 18:14, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
tuxr 18:10, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
I will use wikipedia fearness in future please unblock me. tuxr 18:11, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=I will use wikipedia fairly and deal with good way, I had used multiple account and you people banned me as shock puppetry or abusive account even I had never abuses anyone now I am using only one account please unblock me. tuxr 18:15, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Tuxr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I will use wikipedia fairly and deal with good way, I had used multiple account and you people banned me as shock puppetry or abusive account even I had never abuses anyone now I am using only one account please unblock me.
Decline reason:
Earlier today, you were claiming you didn't use multiple accounts. Given that you've been lying so recently, we can't unblock you. Your best bet is to wait six months, then appeal to be unbanned by following WP:UNBAN, with your original account under the terms of WP:SO. Given your extensive abuse and outright lying, this has almost no chance of success but is your only path forward. Yamla (talk) 18:33, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{unblock|reason=Currently I'm not using multiple account But you investigated that I'm sock puppet of user:karanshrivastava i'm agree with you as I have so many account But I want to use wikipedia & From Now I will never use multiple account please help me in unblocking. If you will not unblock me after I will busy in another work and never use wikipedia you are removing a real volunteer i'm improving my article to write on wikipedia. I will share my good knowledge by proper reference. I have no other reason to request you for unblocking this is Truth and if you are unblocking then ok otherwise i will never use this website in my whole life. Thank you tuxr 18:51, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Tuxr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Currently I'm not using multiple account But you investigated that I'm sock puppet of user:karansrivastava i'm agree with you as I have so many account But I want to use wikipedia & From Now I will never use multiple account please help me in unblocking. If you will not unblock me after I will busy in another work and never use wikipedia you are removing a real volunteer i'm improving my article to write on wikipedia. I will share my good knowledge by proper reference. I have no other reason to request you for unblocking this is Truth and if you are unblocking then ok otherwise i will never use this website in my whole life. Thank you tuxr
Decline reason:
Take advantage of the WP:SO. Changing your story after being caught for being disruptive and asking to be unblocked doesn't work. If these types of appeals continue, someone will pull your talkpage access. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 18:55, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Cut-and-paste move
[edit] Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:Mananpur a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Mananpur, Jehanabad. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. —Wasell(T) 18:40, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Puru Raajkumar
[edit]
Hello, Tuxr. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Puru Raajkumar".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:23, 13 July 2020 (UTC)