User talk:Tyjh99

This is Tyjh99's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kundadam (April 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Kundadam block instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kundadam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kundadam, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 14:56, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. This is article on the city Kundadam and the later one is on a revenue block. As You can see in categories Category:Revenue blocks of Tiruppur district page, all the blocks are present and town with the same name is also present. It is notable aswell. Please move this to article space. Tyjh99 (talk) 17:55, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@S0091 Tyjh99 (talk) 17:56, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Tyjh99 thanks for the explanation. I went and forth about it. Please resubmit it. S0091 (talk) 17:59, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@S0091. Yeah. Just done it. Please move to article space. It also has got more scope for expansion. so can you place stub tag aswell. Tyjh99 (talk) 18:07, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Apologies for my misunderstanding, Tyjh99, but I am glad it was sorted out. S0091 (talk) 18:15, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tyjh99! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 14:56, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kundadam has been accepted[edit]

Kundadam, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 18:12, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Sweetindian per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sweetindian. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:52, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]