User talk:TypicalWellBehavior

January 2016[edit]

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 17:00, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Barack Obama's sons, you may be blocked from editing. BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 17:02, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a severe libel. No one was threatened or attacked. TypicalWellBehavior (talk) 17:03, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Barack Obama's sons. This page is an attack on Barack Obama. BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 17:07, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Are you illiterate? This is a racialist term. You are engaging in a revert war with a political agenda by engaging in severe libel. TypicalWellBehavior (talk) 17:14, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If it were, it would be somewhere else on the internet. You are not allowed to remove speedy deletion notices from pages that you create yourself and you have been reported to the administrator noticeboard for doing so after a final warning. BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 17:19, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is an attack page[edit]

Your page is an attack on Barack Obama. It does not even appear to be a real slang term (search Urban Dictionary). BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 17:09, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stop now. BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 17:10, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You don't get to remove speedy deletion templates on articles you created. You can indeed contest the deletion, but in this case - with no sources and nothing supporting your claim, and also the fact that the term involves a living person? It qualifies as an attack page. Please do not recreate it without sources and documentation supporting its use as an actual term. If you continue to edit war on this matter, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 17:19, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Katie^talk 18:04, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]