Jump to content

User talk:Tzamatz

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Tzamatz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Joseph heller zoologist, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Uberaccount (talk) 18:43, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Joseph heller zoologist requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Uberaccount (talk) 18:43, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Joseph Heller (zoologist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable, and fails WP:NOTRESUME.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Uberaccount (talk) 03:11, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Status and Advice[edit]

I've been defending article like this for a very long time here, and if this is going to be kept, major improvements are needed. The standards for notability are at WP:PROF, and in practice, most Associate Professors are not considered to meet them . It depends on the citations. In a field like this, they may not be very high, which will present a problem.


kindly relate to the following:

Prof. J. Heller is not only an Associate Emeritus Prof. he is very active in the life Science community in Israel and overseas you can learn it from the various posts he held over the years in national level [example being national curator and more as writen in the entry, ]. He takes part in designing the life science education in the country, his books are the first ever written "textbooks" in his field in Hebrew, he addressed cardinal important science books to the hebrew reader by being Scientific adviser of the translated editions. Being the chief editor of Israel Journal of Zoology. (the exact dates will be provided). He colaborated with researchers all over the world teh list of articles present it the diversity of his work, he takes active part in national level project, as presented, nature conservation, developing models .


To give it the best chance:

  1. The key notability factor is the editorship of Israel Journal of Zoology. Indicate if he was editor-in-chief, and the years.
  2. List all author names in our usual format, as Heller, not HELLER.

sure ok Heller 

  1. Remove all but the most cited articles, & give their citations, from Scopus or ISI or Google Scholar. Remove all the book chapters.

it is in process part is already done. In my view the book chapters [in english] he wrote and participated in their publication, show he was invited by other Scientists - authors for his scientific professional reputaion.


  1. For books, list the reviews more clearly, under the titles. Give a book reference to WorldCat for each of them, adding the ISBN.

it is done


  1. List the projects in a paragraph, and give references, possibly to a published work of his, which is another good way to indicate the articles.
  2. Give place of birth, and where and when he got all his degrees.

will be added

10.4.1941 Sydney Australia, all his degrees from Hebrew University Jerusalem as mentioned in the external link to his researcher Cv in the oficial website of The Hebrew Univeristy .


Thank you for your advice

Tzamatz (talk) 20:06, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


I advise you to fix the problems very quickly; I will take another look in a day or two. If I remove the prod tag now, the article will undoubtedly be sent to AfD and probably deleted, so fix it first. DGG ( talk ) 17:20, 10 June 2013 (UTC) . .[reply]

June 2013[edit]

How does X work?[edit]

How the image file i have inserted in my entry Joseph Heller (zoologist) can be shown? at the moment just the file name appears not the image . thanks in advance Tzamatz (talk) 16:31, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The syntax for an image in that infobox should be:
|image = Prof Joseph Heller zoologist faculty of Science Hebrew University Jerusalem.jpg
However, if you look at the image, you'll notice it appears to be a mistaken upload. GorillaWarfare (talk) 17:01, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

thanks alot for the speedy help. So I guess I need to re-upload the pic Tzamatz (talk) 17:11, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you go to the Commons page that I linked above, you can scroll down to "File history" and click "Upload a new version of this file". GorillaWarfare (talk) 17:13, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

BracketBot[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Joseph Heller (zoologist) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Litter shredding in a desert oasis by the snail Melanopsis praemorsa. Hydrobiologia 344: 65-73. ((cite journal|title=Litter shredding in a desert oasis by the snail Melanopsis praemorsa.|journal=
  • shredding-in-a-desert-oasis-by-the-snail-melanopsis-praemorsa/oclc/357118411&referer=brief_results}}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:06, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image files on Commons[edit]

Hello, Tzamatz. You uploaded two image files to Wikimedia Commons, File:Marine molluscs of the Land of Israel Joseph HELLER.jpg and File:Land Snails of the Land of Israel Joseph HELLER.jpg. Each is marked as being your own work. Each of these images looks like a scan of a book cover, though. Is that correct? I am no expert, but I think that book covers are usually copyrighted by the book publisher, in which case I think a scan of the cover would be protected under the same copyright. I'm going to start a discussion on Wikimedia Commons in the hopes that people more expert than I am can clarify the situation. Cnilep (talk) 02:53, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion is here. –Cnilep (talk) 03:02, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. The scans done by me of the photos in subject [book cover] were under the direct premission given by the author of the books, who is the sole copyrights holder it can be easly verified directly with him.

Can anybody advice due to which technical reason the protrait photo I took was deleted from the entry? Tzamatz (talk) 16:33, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that the file name you used in this edit was incorrect. At least, there is no file of that name on English-language Wikipedia, and I see no record of it having been deleted. It appears that the picture removed here was deleted from Wikimedia Commons because of concerns about copyright. If you own the copyright of these images, I think there is a way to give Wikipedia the right to use them. I don't understand all the details, but Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials has some description of the process. Cnilep (talk) 06:00, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]