User talk:UKRoyalFan

July 2021[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Invictus Games have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Invictus Games was changed by UKRoyals (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.902895 on 2021-07-18T10:28:30+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:28, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UKRoyals, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi UKRoyals! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Bsoyka (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Teahouse[edit]

Very honoured to be invited. I hope to keep standards high! UKRoyals (talk) 16:27, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hi UKRoyals! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:20, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I’m trying to create a draft page about on of Prince Harry’s staff. Do I do as UKRoyals/sandbox or HisName/Sandbox? UKRoyals (talk) 15:24, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

one UKRoyals (talk) 15:25, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
UKRoyals, You can create as Draft:xxxxxx (where xxxxxx is the future article name) or you can work on it in your user sandbox(es) Thank you JW 1961^Talk 17:41, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Brilliant. Really helpful, thanks! UKRoyalFan (talk) 17:43, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Username[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "UKRoyals", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because Your username may imply you are multiple people ("Royals"), and furthermore may imply a connection with the royal family (e.g. [1]).. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. Eostrix (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 15:25, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note that usernames such as "UKRoyalsFan" or "FanOfUKRoyals" would be legitimate, but a usernames that can be construed as representing the group in question are a problem.--Eostrix (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 15:27, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thank you. That’s really helpful! Probably best to just to set up a new one! Thanks!!! UKRoyals (talk) 15:29, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I actually took your initial advice and sent in a name change request. It took minutes! Many thanks. UKRoyalFan (talk) 15:54, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Both routes are fine, renames are usually fairly quick if you are asking for an available username.--Eostrix (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 15:56, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, someone got back to me in minutes. Probably a nice bot 😀 UKRoyalFan (talk) 15:58, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not in this case, this was handled by a long time administrator on Wikipedia.--Eostrix (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 15:59, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I’m honoured! Looking forward to being part of this community. UKRoyalFan (talk) 16:01, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Page moved[edit]

The page you created UKRoyals/sandbox has been moved to your userspace as User:UKRoyalFan/sandbox2 - please create sandboxes in your own user space rather than main article space. For help on creating article visit the WP:TEAHOUSE. Welcome and I hope you enjoy editing here JW 1961^Talk 17:39, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I’m learning! UKRoyalFan (talk) 21:09, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ELF[edit]

Consider removing that British aristocrat mention from the Lead, as that is not what makes him notable. What might be helpful is creating a Early life and education section. That's where referenced content on what makes him an aristocrat can be placed. David notMD (talk) 00:27, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Really helpful. I read somewhere that he had an Masters but will do some proper research. UKRoyalFan (talk) 08:10, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve done all that!!! UKRoyalFan (talk) 18:53, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If accepted, the reviewer will change the article title to Edward Lane Fox. David notMD (talk) 11:59, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Someone else has suggested some more tidy ups. I’ll get on those ASAP and then submit it. Thanks for your help! UKRoyalFan (talk) 12:50, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edward Lane Fox (August 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clarityfiend was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:BIO. Aside from one small article, there are no substantial writeups about him.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Edward Lane Fox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Edward Lane Fox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Clarityfiend (talk) 19:03, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edward Lane Fox (August 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cabrils was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please refer to the previous reviewer's comments: this article fails WP:BIO. Your addition of 'The Guardian' article does not improve the page (it does not mention the subject Edward Lane Fox). Similarly, other references are irrelevant to this page (eg [this article] makes no mention of Fox or Cohen.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Edward Lane Fox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Edward Lane Fox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cabrils (talk) 23:33, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Edward Lane Fox[edit]

Hello, UKRoyalFan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Edward Lane Fox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Edward Lane Fox[edit]

Hello, UKRoyalFan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Edward Lane Fox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:07, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]