User talk:USZSI

Welcome!

Hello, USZSI, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see:

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page and how to develop articles
Help pages
Tutorials
Article wizard for creating new articles
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 09:09, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chandlery Corner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frederick Schneider. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of اموی معاشرہ

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on اموی معاشرہ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 03:20, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! USZSI, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:32, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Umayyad society moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Umayyad society, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 11:20, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

I've reverted a bunch of your edits per MOS:OL. Commonly known words like 'zoo' should not be linked. – ².O.^Boxing 06:30, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Random commas, overlinking, and other language changes

Please don't make edits such as [1],[2],[3],[4], and [5], all of which added incorrect commas, wikilinks to the wrong article, or grammar errors. You have also added commas in various articles where the comma isn't incorrect, but is unnecessary, and a large number of wikilinks that are against the manual of style (as also described above). Please stop making that kind of edit. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 07:54, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

After I posted the above, you made two edits: this which added incorrect punctuation, and this which added a useful wikilink but with a name that doesn't help the reader understand what it is. --bonadea contributions talk 09:22, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And this. Per the guidelines already quoted, commonly known countries such as Mexico generally shouldn't be linked. – ².O.^Boxing 10:07, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Then which countries should be linked Can you please elaborate. USZSI (talk) 10:12, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any specific reason, that Mexico should not be linked? USZSI (talk) 10:16, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All the information you need can be found at MOS:OVERLINK. – ².O.^Boxing 10:46, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you dear for your information. Take care USZSI (talk) 10:47, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are still doing the same thing. Linking politician (a very common word) here, linking Innsbruck in a sentence where the name was already wikilinked here, adding a link to the phrase "federal government", pointing at federation here, and as for this edit, I don't know if you were trying to joke about the topic or if you genuinely thought that it was a relevant link. (It isn't.) --bonadea contributions talk 12:21, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Now I got it that I Don't have to link the common words. Thank you for your guidance. and looking forward for your guidance. USZSI (talk) 12:30, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oza-Nogogo moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Oza-Nogogo, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can work on the article with minimal disruption.

Unclear topic (is it a region, a city, a culture, all of those, or none of them?) Several sources are not reliable or otherwise inappropriate. Some sources do not mention the topic, others are not presented in a way that makes them possible to check.

When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

Please do not move it to mainspace yourself. bonadea contributions talk 08:27, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oza-Nogogo (March 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

As I said in the draftification note: Unclear topic (is it a region, a city, a culture, all of those, or something else?)

Several sources are not reliable or otherwise inappropriate, for instance Wikipedia articles and links to amazon.com.

Some sources do not mention the topic, such as the Guinness annual report from 2017, and the journal article about biospheres. It looks like they were added randomly, based on an individual word in the source (Guinness lists "Ozanogonogo" as a community they have worked with; the Every day a biosphere article has two authors with the surname Oza).

Others are not presented in a way that makes them possible to check, such as "Oza-Nogogo: a peripheral Edo community". I have traced that source but do not have access to it.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oza-Nogogo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Oza-Nogogo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 12:03, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Pasce Oves Meas, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. You either have not read WP:OL and the notices above, despite multiple requests for you to do so, or else you have not understood the information. Either way, your behaviour is disruptive. Stop adding wikilinks to articles, please. bonadea contributions talk 21:57, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Sorry, I am new on this platform, Once I do any publishing or any editing will take your guidance, Stay Blessed. USZSI (talk) 22:44, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have done one edit. Is it ok now

Thanks for your help in advance. USZSI (talk) 09:52, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Hello USZSI. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:USZSI. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=USZSI|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. CUPIDICAE💕 19:17, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, i see you have moved my Page to draft. I would like to to inform you that with much research from reliable sources, the Article was created. Each of the Line/Sentence has been linked with with its reliable sources. Kindly remove the tag for undisclosed payments because i have not taken any payments for it, nor I intend to do COI. Please educate me further being my senior Wikipedia, Thanks.. USZSI (talk) 21:20, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent the information to ArbCom and I will gladly link the advert on the talk page, as I don't intend to remove the tags. CUPIDICAE💕 21:25, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

– Joe (talk) 06:22, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I request you that I have done nothing wrong for which my account has been blocked. if you have any reason then you should to inform me and give me chance that i will not do in future. USZSI (talk) 21:06, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I blocked you because you have been misusing multiple accounts to make undisclosed paid edits to Wikipedia in violation of our Terms of Use. – Joe (talk) 06:57, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No No Dear, I only have one account which i am using. I swear I don't have any other account then this. Some time is internet changed when I go to Coffee Cafe. That's all.

I Swear that I don't have any other account and never get any money for any edits.. USZSI (talk) 08:06, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And dear Jeo believe me I have not done any thing wrong which is against the Wikipedia Policy. Please unblock my account. USZSI (talk) 08:07, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Umayyad society

Hello, USZSI. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Umayyad society, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Oza-Nogogo

Hello, USZSI. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Oza-Nogogo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]