User talk:Uddeshd07

July 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Renewal6. I noticed that you recently removed content from Christianization of Goa without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Renewal6 (talk) 12:28, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Goa. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 07:59, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Goa, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 11:11, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Annexation of Goa. The Banner talk 23:44, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]