User talk:Udu222

MOS:TV[edit]

Hi there, re: your recent edits at Udaan (2014 TV series), you might find our Manual of Style for Television to be of value, as it lays out community expectations fairly clearly. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:03, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Awards[edit]

Hi there, re: this reversion, where are the Wikipedia articles in which notability of these awards has been properly established? That's typically what we are looking for, for instance at WP:FILMCRITICLIST, which says "Awards included in lists should have a Wikipedia article to demonstrate notability. Because of the proliferation of film festivals and "award mills", festival awards should be added with discretion, with inclusion subject to consensus. Awards bestowed by web-only entities are not included." The existence of an article at Wikipedia is typically required for lists of this sort. Your personal assertion that the awards are notable does not resolve the concern. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:27, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:DivyankaTripathi.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:DivyankaTripathi.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 10:01, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Non-existent categories[edit]

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to File:DivyankaTripathi.jpg, please make sure that the category page actually exists. In some cases, it may be appropriate to create a new category in accordance with Wikipedia's categorization guidelines, but it is usually better to use the most specific available existing category. It is never appropriate to leave a page categorised in a non-existent category, i.e. one whose link displays in red. Thank you. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:20, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Luka Chuppi, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diff: [1] We're not here to add our own opinions about a film's performance. If this film has received positive reviews, find a reliable source that arrives at that conclusion. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 07:36, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

When reverting, please ensure that you do not revert valid edits as you did here. "Revert to last" is not an appropriate edit summary as wholesale reversions such as these can give the impreesion that the edit is vandalism. --AussieLegend (✉) 13:07, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Former account[edit]

Have you edited Wikipedia under a different account before? Your knowledge of Wiki markup is quite good for a new user. Ravensfire (talk) 18:19, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No used to edit as an IP thought should make an account — Preceding unsigned comment added by Udu222 (talk • contribs) 05:43, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Luka Chuppi, you may be blocked from editing. AryanTheArticleArtist (talk) 07:50, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What dispute are you talking about? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Udu222 (talk • contribs) 01:52, March 3, 2019 (UTC)

This is an amazingly bad edit. While I'm pretty darn sure you've been blocked on a previous account and which account that is, you still need to edit responsibly until the SPI happens. Don't do that again. Ravensfire (talk) 22:04, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not only a bad edit, but the misuse of "it's" is irritating. Udu, note that if you are evading a previous block, all of your edits--ALL OF THEM--may be reverted by other editors without regard for whether they were constructive or not. That's how little regard we have for people who evade blocks. If I were you, I'd consider the standard offer. Disappear for six months, don't edit during that time, access your first account, post an unblock request that indicates you fully understand what problems led to your blocks, and you could be editing legitimately again. I don't think that most of your edits are bad, but we will not tolerate sockpuppetry. And if you are being paid to edit (which is typically the case when people can't keep themselves from coming back) you need to disclose that. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:12, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]