User talk:Elike2018

Welcome!

Hello, Umutako, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Umutako/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Redalert2fan (talk) 16:04, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Umutako/sandbox

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Umutako/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Redalert2fan (talk) 16:04, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock-spamun|elike2018|previous username similar to the 1st article}Umutako (talk) 16:28, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:10, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Elike2018 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

After explaining why my account was blocked due to similar username to an article, one of the administrators was convinced and renamed the username.RHaworth has failed to unblock my account, if not bias and with a references to talk most comments are about deletion of proper account and articles. Can you please proof, the current reason keeping my account blocked and a suggestion to you, stop deleting every article or account you feel that doesn't satisfy your knowledge it is best to discuss the issue before taking action otherwise you are failing your administrative role. Elike2018 (talk) 17:48, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Oh believe me, we would be failing our administrative duties if we didn't block users who are here only to promote their companies. Max Semenik (talk) 18:23, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Elike2018 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Max Semenik (talk you sound no way different from most of the administrators that have reviewed the request, i doubt you'd even change the username. See, what you need to put in mind is that rules/policies apply to regulate society and common sense is used to pass or give exceptions as there might seem a change in policy. That's the general role of an administrator. Believe me or not, all the millions of articles on wikipedia were written in violation of COI and Paid Editing policy otherwise you would not have a single article on wikipedia about a company or entity(as an administrator, weigh your knowledge in such that you are doing the best for wikipedia). Furthermore, i am not associated or trying to promote a company or business. CLEAR?!!

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:26, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Elike2018 (talk) 00:30, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, we definitely have non-compliant articles here, but that not a reason to add more. Right now, the key question is why you decided to write about a certain marketspace where There is no fee to sell and signing up is free. All the evidence goes against your claims that you're not related to them. Try to imagine how it looks from a third person perspective. Max Semenik (talk) 15:49, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Very good question Max Semenik, that brings about a relative question of why the article triggered more attention than those that might fall in the same category? Without making this thread very long as there seems to be no conclusion(a win, win situation), why wouldn't one write about a marketplace that has no fee to sell and yet free to signup?(Its an usual/ unique, right?) and informative other than promoting. Boing! said Zebedee the block was not necessary to prevent damage to wikipedia and the reason for the block is nolonger valid as the username was changed that seemed to be connected to the first article(do you think the second or other articles would be related?) though it couldn't cause any harm or disruption to wikipedia. Its great that wikipedia administrators have given more thought about their actions, a need to improve and a demand to review policies towards the goals of wikipedia. Thank you all for your + and - criticism, I rest my case. Elike2018 (talk) 20:04, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. WP:OTHERSTUFF; other articles are not relevant to your case so stop bringing them up. And no, a marketplace site with no fee to sell and free to sign up is neither unique nor unusual. I can think of several active in my hometown. Several people have said they simply don't believe you are entirely unrelated to that business. --Yamla (talk) 11:40, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla YOU WIN. Now that you can think of several active in your hometown, do not write about them. Elike2018 (talk) 21:35, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

globally renamed Umutako to Elike2018

globally renamed Umutako to Elike2018-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:23, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]