User talk:Update27

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Soccermeko (talk • contribs • block log • creation log). As a blocked or banned user you are not entitled to edit Wikipedia. All of your edits have been reverted.

Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Update27 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Just because I edit the Nicole Wray first does not make me sockpuppet of whoever. You need to be block for damaging the page. It's members like that, that make Wikipedia look bad. You can not prove what is untrue. So I request an unblock.

Decline reason:

The apparent personal attack/incivility makes me not want to unblock at this time. Come up with a more temperate unblock request, please, and above all, don't panic. Declined (for now). — Jéské ^{(v^_^v Karistaa Usko)} 00:54, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Like I said to Kww, Wikipedia is free to any who wants to contribute. Update27 (talk) 00:43, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not so. -Jéské ^{(v^_^v Karistaa Usko)} 00:54, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Again[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Update27 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Before I began editting, I stated that I was not a sockpuppet. I knew you would blame for that. And again, honestly I am not a sockpuppet of Soccermeko. Update27 (talk) 17:56, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Not a sock? Your contributions prove otherwise. MaxSem^{(Han shot first!)} 18:08, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Comment Contributions prove nothing. If someone else did the same thing to you, you wouldn't like it. I will not be turned over because of your false belief. Update27 (talk) 18:33, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please stop? If you did the following things:

Opened a new account - don't apply
Didn't touch a Nicole Wray article for 9 months or so - don't apply
Followed the rules, and only used well sourced material, and included citations - wrong person
Learned English well enough that we couldn't recognize you by your bad grammar - don't apply

then probably no one would ever know it was you, and, if you really wanted to contribute, no one would stop you. - Fails approval

Kww (talk) 19:55, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Now something for you, would you please stop the following?

Shut Up

You learn to respect

Learn good English

Stop misnaming people

Any can edit the page and contribute whether you like it or not

And this is my first account, so what you talking about

I know going on. You don't like to see the page editted by no one. Which why you blame innocent users like me to a sockpuppet. And then you say

"Well your edits prove other wise"

Face the fact that you were wrong and that you hate Nicole Wray. Because I going help that page and I don't care what you say. If you don't want nobody to edit it then delete it. Because it a disgrace and a shame that you add all the wrong information. Your stupid edits are out of control. Update27 (talk) 16:22, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My Contributions[edit]

And if my contributions were not accept, why were they added to the page. Me and lateupdate26 found that stuff(Reverbnation and Sta Bizzi Entertainment). If you don't need help adding on to the page, then take that off the page and find your own links and references instead of using mine. That why I don't like helping out a lot because you steal other people contributions and take the credits. Update27 (talk) 16:29, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice and unblock declination[edit]

Please do not remove the block notice and/or unblock declination again. If you do so, your talk page will be protected and you will not be able to edit it. --Geniac (talk) 17:40, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]