User talk:Useight/Archive20

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Belated addition[edit]

I've belatedly amended the CratChat page with the interesting analysis you recently provided... see [1] --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 10:26, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PS It's always nice to see you around, for whatever reason that may be. I love that we now have WP:USEIGHT. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 10:26, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Barnstar of Diplomacy
Nothing else to add really. Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 11:51, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah![edit]

Glad to see new edits from you from your main account, Useight. :) Also impressed with the timing - August 16th, 2012 was the last day you edited with it until today, so five years exactly! Acalamari 23:49, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I don't feel five years older. Time flies. Now I just need to figure out where I left off... Useight (talk) 23:58, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Useight. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Substance[edit]

Vacuous "I just disagree for, uh, no reason" comments like this never add anything useful. It's not an actual argument/refutation/position, just contrarianism to be contrary. Please provide an actual rationale when contradicting people.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  12:22, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am quite taciturn. I speak only what is necessary and expect the reader to be able to infer meaning, when inference is required. In the example you cited, I disagreed with your statement that the discussion was hinging on what Ymblanter said upon resigning the tools. Therefore, it is to be inferred that I read the comments as hinging on something else besides that, but because I specifically didn't state anything further, it is to be inferred that I was not interested in an argument regarding what factor(s) the situation was hinging on. I do not get into long, deep conversations, nor do I get involved in drama, arguments, or confrontations. Have a pleasant day. Useight (talk) 15:04, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow bureaucrats, in regards to a current RfA that has met its time, I would like your assistance in judging the community consensus presented in the discussion at Jbhunley's RfA. Your input would be most welcome at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Jbhunley/Bureaucrat chat. Best regards, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:37, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Useight. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Precious[edit]

"my reply here"

Thank you for beginning and maintaining articles about baseball seasons, for admin and bureaucrat services, for gnomish work, for welcoming new users and supporting new admins, - repeating (ten years ago and 24 January 2009): you are an awesome Wikipedian!

Awesome
Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:33, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Ten years? I'm getting old. Useight's Public Sock (talk) 15:50, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
... and ten again ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:03, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]