User talk:Utinsh

Welcome

Hello, Utinsh! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! ^Talk/♥фĩłдωəß♥\^Work 05:24, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Appearances

Cheers for the message, and it's nice to know you now have a soft spot for Stevenage! Top lad! I have noticed some very useful edits by yourself when it comes to Stevenage and Stevenage players – like linking the likes of Michael Bostwick, Peter Vincenti, and Lawrie Wilson after their Wikipedia profiles had been made. Regarding the List of Stevenage F.C. players, the reason the figures differ ever so slightly is because the List of Stevenage F.C. players page includes appearances made in the likes of the Conference League Cup, whereas I have not included these appearances in the actual players' profiles and their career statistics (if you look at the footnotes section, the Conference League Cup is not included). For instance, Mitchell Cole made 142 appearances in all competitions for Stevenage, two of which were in the Conference League Cup. Therefore, on his profile, he has made 140 appearances. However, I understand that there are mistakes in a lot of the career numbers and that is something that I have been meaning to sort out. As you rightly point out, overall statistics are way off in some cases, and it is on my 'to do' list. Thanks for the heads up. SBFCEdit (talk) 15:57, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AFCW

I'll admit that I always just presumed they became full-time during the summer as they said they would, but I'll admit that sources for it are scarce. It's hard to actually know if they have or not, what with the confidentiality of contracts, but according to this article from The Guardian they did during the summer, as they announced they would ("Wimbledon, who decided to go full-time this season as they push for promotion to the Football League"). See also the Surrey Herald (here: "Inns admits that he would still be an AFC Wimbledon player if they had not turned full-time" ... "I was going to stay with Wimbledon before the decision was made to go full-time at the end of the season") and the Eenin Stannit (article, "During this season the club turned full time although Samuelson says the wage budget is the same as for last season, since they have let go a lot of the older part-time players on higher wages"). I hope this helps. Keep well buddy. – Cliftonian^{the orangey bit} 21:04, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do as you see fit. I don't think too much is necessary, just some extra referencing and something making it clear that they did turn fully pro. Let me know if you need anything else from me, I'm always glad to help if I can. Keep well bru. – Cliftonian^{the orangey bit} 21:30, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I think the reason it's so vague is because Wimbledon regarded the announcement as them turning full-time? I don't know. If you like I can write to them. – Cliftonian^{the orangey bit} 21:31, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was meaning I could write and request a definitive statement on the matter from them, but never mind. I don't think it's that big of a deal anyway. Keep well shamwari, – Cliftonian^{the orangey bit} 21:42, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Malmö FF

Hi. Thanks for your comment on the FAC. I have replied at the FAC page. Reckless182 (talk) 20:04, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Southampton F.C. players

Yo, I appreciate that you want to help out with the Southampton F.C. players article (how did you even find the user sub-page!?), but yeah all the facts (like wiki links and nationalities) I am planning on going over once I've got all the players in there, so don't worry about editing it just yet. I'm not having a go at you :) But yeah, I'm basically grabbing all the players from a website and using the nationality they provide, then when I check wiki links I can check nationality too. See you soon :) Andre666 (talk) 07:21, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations \| June 2022 Backlog Drive
On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:27, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]