User talk:Uwmad

License tagging for Image:Flyash.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Flyash.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:06, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Your contributions to "critique of capitalism"

First, thanks for your contributions to "critique of capitalism." Your analysis of the page is correct. It is long overdue for an overhaul. I may join you in contributing material and re-organizing soon. However, I should mention that your contributions thus far, which I know to be accurate accounts of the works of people like Marx and Engels, contain no citations. You should know that, probably sooner than later, someone will request citations and threaten to delete the material if they are not provided. Cheers!BernardL (talk) 23:00, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings

Hello. Thanks for your input. Hopefully we can make the article better. Competition with different goals gives the best results!Ultramarine (talk) 14:27, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Come play in my sandbox

hey NJfuller. I have started a sandbox ... [[1]] with respect to an overhaul of the critique of capitalism page. I reorganized the current article under the outline that was discussed in talk. I hope that it is something that we can work with. I have removed some material to the discussion page of the sandbox. I feel that there is alot more material that does not belong in the article. I have also included a few quotes and parenthesized notes which hope fully we can use in combination with other new ideas to construct an article that merit the importance of the subject. Please feel free to edit the sandbox and participate in the discussion. Regards...BernardL (talk) 22:44, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mifflin Street Block Party

I'm glad to see that another competent editor has taken charge on this page... Keep up the good work. :-) Grand master ka 07:17, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

United States presidential election, 2008

18 million voters unimportant? You mean the folks who supported Clinton? GoodDay (talk) 17:41, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see. GoodDay (talk) 19:08, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I guess by repeating my argument for full exclusion until November, isn't working (it's getting more & more ignored by mostly everyone), oh well. I may aswell sit back & enjoy the disputes - PS- I'm still considering requesting some sorta 'page protection'; but so far things have calmed down. GoodDay (talk) 19:26, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

United States Presidential Election 2008 Mediation

Hi, I've accepted the United States Presidential Election 2008 Mediation, and you are listed as one of the participants. Please feel free to comment and participate in the discussion on the mediation page. BrownHornet21 (talk) 00:29, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Buckle in the bible belt.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Buckle in the bible belt.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 08:23, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of ECONned for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ECONned is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ECONned until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Grnrchst (talk) 12:42, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]