User talk:VIMMYSEAJATAN/Job Rotation

Name of student reviewer	Wikipedia User: Keronica Grant
Date of review	5/9/2013
Name of editor	Wikipedia User: VIMMYSEAJATAN
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:VIMMYSEAJATAN
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	05/9/13
Date review submitted to instructor	05/9/13
Length of edit (too long/too short)	Good Length
Image (needed/appropriate)	N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	Accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	Accurate to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting	Good Formatting
Grammar & composition	Good grammar
Other comments	good job! --Keronica Grant (talk) 18:35, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback[edit]

Name of student reviewer	Wikipedia User:Joselv83
Date of review	5/9/2013
Name of editor	Wikipedia User: VIMMYSEAJATAN
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:VIMMYSEAJATAN
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	05/9/13
Date review submitted to instructor	05/9/13
Length of edit (too long/too short)	Good Length, but can be a little longer.
Image (needed/appropriate)	N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	Accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	Accurate to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting	Good Formatting.
Grammar & composition	Good grammar.
Other comments	Looks pretty good, good job!

Joselv83 (talk) 17:38, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Name of student reviewer	Wikipedia User: M.Caban
Date of review	5/9/2013
Name of editor	Wikipedia User: VIMMYSEAJATAN
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:VIMMYSEAJATAN
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	05/9/13
Date review submitted to instructor	05/9/13
Length of edit (too long/too short)	Good Length.
Image (needed/appropriate)	Not needed
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	Accurate to text
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	Accurate to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting	Good on bullets and bold.
Grammar & composition	Good grammar. Small error> Need to switch two words on the third sentence "Work to with" > to work with.
Other comments	good job!

Name of student reviewer	Wikipedia User: F.Moshammad
Date of review	5/10/2013
Name of editor	Wikipedia User: VIMMYSEAJATAN
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:VIMMYSEAJATAN
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	05/10/13
Date review submitted to instructor	05/10/13
Length of edit (too long/too short)	Good Length, not too short.
Image (needed/appropriate)	N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	Accurate to textbook information
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	Accurate to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting	Good Formatting
Grammar & composition	Good grammar
Other comments	Good job!

F.Moshammad (talk) 05:01, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Name of student reviewer	Wikipedia User: Mtrowers
Date of review	5/10/2013
Name of editor	Wikipedia User: VIMMYSEAJATAN
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:VIMMYSEAJATAN
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	05/10/13
Date review submitted to instructor	05/10/13
Length of edit (too long/too short)	Good Length
Image (needed/appropriate)	N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	Accurate to textbook information
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	Accurate to I/O Psychology
Wikiformatting	Good Formatting
Grammar & composition	Nice grammar
Other comments	Good work!

Mtrowers (talk) 15:16, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]