User talk:VM510

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

Hi Vanessamule! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 19:22, Monday, August 22, 2016 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Your submission at Articles for creation: CoLAB Planning Series (July 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DrStrauss was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:PEACOCK

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:CoLAB Planning Series and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DrStrauss talk 08:29, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! VM510, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DrStrauss talk 08:29, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC[edit]

Hi,

Thanks for your message, I don't have access to the AfC review script anymore, I suggest asking at WP:AFCHELP.

DrStrauss talk 18:07, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: CoLAB Planning Series (August 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NewYorkActuary was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Although the draft neglects to state so, this process was the creation of the lead author of the text that is used five times as a reference (and who happens to have the same first name as the username of one of this draft's major contributors). Two of the other references are documents written by faculty at the university at which this person teaches (and one of the documents is written by that person herself), and another is merely a brief notice for an event that uses the process, complete with a quote from that inventor. As for the other references, they don't discuss the process at all. Instead, they are used as references for background material. Two of them are used to introduce someone else's notion of a "liquid network", at which point simply declares that the instant process is an example of such a thing (which strikes me as a clear instance of WP:SYNTH).

In all, the subject appears to be a process invented by a particular university teacher that has been discussed by no one other than the inventor herself or people associated with her. As such, I see no demonstration of encyclopedic notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:CoLAB Planning Series and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

NewYorkActuary (talk) 20:39, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:CoLAB Planning Series concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:CoLAB Planning Series, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:CoLAB Planning Series concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:CoLAB Planning Series, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Collaborative grant-seeking[edit]

Hello, VM510. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Collaborative grant-seeking".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 22:51, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:CoLAB Planning Series[edit]

Hello, VM510. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "CoLAB Planning Series".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 22:00, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]