User talk:VT DLA

Welcome![edit]

Hello, VT DLA, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for 1-D Saint Venant Equation. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Epipelagic (talk) 19:14, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/1-D Saint Venant Equation.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Hasteur (talk) 16:17, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

1-D Saint Venant Equation, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LionMans Account (talk) 14:06, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Table of boundary conditions and solution for a hydrograph routed down a channel using an forward difference approximation of an explicit solution of the kinematic wave with a Courant number of 0.9.pdf[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Table of boundary conditions and solution for a hydrograph routed down a channel using an forward difference approximation of an explicit solution of the kinematic wave with a Courant number of 0.9.pdf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a Word document or PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pkbwcgs (talk) 10:54, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Illustration of explicit iterative scheme with distance (x) on the x axis and time (t) on the y axis. The known points (dark grey) are used to calculate the unknown point (red).png[edit]

The file File:Illustration of explicit iterative scheme with distance (x) on the x axis and time (t) on the y axis. The known points (dark grey) are used to calculate the unknown point (red).png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Flow at the upstream (x = 0 m) end and downstream (x = 1000 m) end an example routing channel where the boundary conditions at time of 0 and at the upstrema boundary are known. The explicit solution of the Kinematic Wave is used. .png[edit]

The file File:Flow at the upstream (x = 0 m) end and downstream (x = 1000 m) end an example routing channel where the boundary conditions at time of 0 and at the upstrema boundary are known. The explicit solution of the Kinematic Wave is used. .png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]