User talk:Vandalwatcher

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Vandalwatcher, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Bob talk 12:03, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

JK[edit]

Yeah - on reflection I think you're probably right about the mention of the EU court thing... come dive in on the talk page, and let's talk about it :-) Privatemusings (talk) 07:40, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Jonathan King, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TeapotgeorgeTalk 08:45, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TeapotgeorgeTalk 08:56, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It seems people are editing without checking - several refs stand up to detailed scrutiny - articles etc - so have replaced refs. Example - the RIAA certificate may be forged but it is better to accept it is not until proven otherwise - or should we assume all refs are fraudulent? Vandalwatcher (talk) 09:00, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hi (again) VW :-) - I'm not going to do any more reverting or editing or anything today at the JK page, and really and truly I reckon the best way forward is for you to also stop editing for now, and jump in at the talk page - it's much easier to find ways forward if we talk about it, and it's always silly to allow the temperature to rise too much in terms of edits - come and chat, and we can figure it all out :-) cheers, Privatemusings (talk) 09:08, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]