User talk:VanillaX

Here, I'm putting this in for ease. Thanks.

[edit]

Revrt[edit]

I jst revrtd an anonymous edt to yr user pg. However, since it was kind of unclear whether or not it was a vandal edit, I wanted to drop you a note to let you know. –Abe Dashiell ^(t/c) 18:30, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks a bunch. User:VanillaX

Caroline "Sunshine"[edit]

I suggest you not post Caroline "Sunshine" again, or you will be blocked from editing. Such extreme slander is never an appropriate edit. User:Zoe|^(talk) 04:02, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You're slandering some forum denizen. The information is, obviously, false, and just because you put a link to some website doesn't make it true. Give me newspaper articles. User:Zoe|^(talk) 04:06, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The Toronto Sun link doesn't work, and the other one doesn't mention any names, so claiming that this is the person you wrote about doesn't work. User:Zoe|^(talk) 04:10, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, we need sources, and unless you can come up with something other than the Tucker Max website, you don't have them. Even if the article were sourced, it would probably wind up on AfD anyway. User:Zoe|^(talk) 04:18, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've redeleted it and protected it deleted until such a time as you produce proof. User:Zoe|^(talk) 04:41, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

There are no names. The articles don't even name the website this information was supposedly posted on. I could point to any article which doesn't name names and claim that it belongs to some enemy of mine. I'm not saying this is what you are doing, but we need proof. User:Zoe|^(talk) 04:46, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your broken editor[edit]

Please fix whatever it is that is causing edits like this one and this one. Uncle G 18:26, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

You'd better update your counter— your user page has just been vandalized eight more times! :) Cheers, Sango 123 (talk) 22:01, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for saving my page! - VanillaX

Lord Capulet[edit]

Hey, I noticed you're a major editor of Lord Capulet, and a member of the Japanese Mythology Project. Mitsukai and I at the Japanese Mythology Project are considering reccomending this article for deletion via {{prod}}, but since you're a project member we'd like to hear your take on it first at the project talk page. Thanks! MikeDockery 00:11, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing. I think people should get a chance to defend their edits if possible before a page goes to the deletion process. Thanks for your reply. I still have some concerns about the article, but I will address them on the project talk page. If you want to reply here, I've watched your talk page. MikeDockery 05:42, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Joebermudez.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Joebermudez.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:42, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Joebermudezprofile.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Joebermudezprofile.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:26, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Earthworkspicture.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Earthworkspicture.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:17, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

spam[edit]

A tag has been placed on Vanilla Revolution, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dropal 06:39, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kaboohoo Network[edit]

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags. If you disagree with this tag and wish to contest it, please put {{hangon}}> on the page (but do not remove the speedy delete tag), and your reason on the talk page. Further removal of the speedy delete tag may be considered vandalism. --Адам12901 ^Talk 07:01, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Kaboohoo Network[edit]

Template:Kaboohoo Network has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. --Адам12901 ^Talk 07:12, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MfD[edit]

Hello! Wikipedia:WikiProject Joe Bermudez has been nominated for Deletion at WP:MFD, you are free to voice your opinion about the matter their in order for Wikipedians to reach community consensus - Thanks, Telly addict 11:45, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Joe_Bermudez.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Joe_Bermudez.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:31, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Blogging[edit]

I see you're a member of WikiProject Blogging. Help us by assessing blog-related articles. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Blogging/Assessment for more information. Computerjoe 's talk 16:05, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Citing your own blog AKA "Vanilla revolution" inside articles[edit]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

This violates so many policys. WP:SPS, WP:NOR, wp:SPAM, WP:NOT#NEWS being just a few! you are an experienced editor, you should know this.Coffeepusher (talk) 07:26, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aerial Assault Dedicated Server[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Aerial Assault Dedicated Server, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Aerial Assault Dedicated Server. tgies (talk) 08:54, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]