User talk:Vanished user 6393699/Archive 18
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
A barnstar for you!!!!
|
Planet Herald's Guestbook Barnstar | |
| Thank you for signing my guestbook...... Happy editing!!! With love, |
A barnstar for you!
|
The Special Barnstar |
| Thanks for redesigning the user talk page! Appreciate that! ///EuroCarGT 22:23, 12 November 2013 (UTC) |
- Again thank you! If you need to contact me, you know where to go, I'm not a good page designer here so you did a great job! I've tweak a little things, but again thanks! ///EuroCarGT 22:29, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Yunshui 雲水 11:33, 13 November 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
- Hi! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
- -- 19:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Disambiguation link notification for November 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dhoom 3, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wankhede (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Aadhaar
Hi Ruby Murray,
I developed the article "Aadhaar" from scratch. It was a blank redirect page to UIDAI. The development was done in bits & pieces from 27-Oct-2013 to 18-Nov-2013 (about 3 weeks). I have spent considerable time and effort.
You Ruby Murray (Soham Banerjee) also helped me a lot in making the sentences neutral, editing, formatting etc. which I acknowledged by thanking you.
Today I noticed by work of 3 weeks vandalized - made blank page redirect to UIDAI page which has almost no constructive content (against the spirit of encyclopedia to permeate knowledge).
My contribution from UIDAI pages were deleted in October-2013 on the ground that my contents belonged to 'Aadhaar' program, whereas 'UIDAI' page should contain Organization related content only. I agreed to this logic, hence developed the 'Aadhaar' page from scratch. The traces of development is present on the wiki-server for records.
Please help.
Regards, Ravishyam Bangalore (talk) 09:19, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Hi, I have warned this user on his talk page for WP:OUTING and for his disruptive editing on UIDAI related topics.Notabede (talk) 10:22, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 03:07, 20 November 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
///EuroCarGT 03:07, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Welcome to STiki!
|
Hello, Sohambanerjee1998, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Here are some pages which are a little more fun:
We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and Pratyya (Hello!) 05:10, 21 November 2013 (UTC) |
|
Please check you inbox. You got a mail! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ibn AlMoafa (talk • contribs) 13:32, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Message added 03:08, 22 November 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Message added 07:15, 22 November 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
... thank you!
Thank you for the "thanks"! Welcome to STiki. — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 10:31, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
- Nah.. don't thank me. When viewing in STiki it seemed like a removal of content. Sohambanerjee1998 10:33, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
- Concur. IPs rarely leave an edit summary, but I had previously thought of pruning the article in a similar manner. Best wishes, — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 10:37, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
- Yes it was a fault on my part considering the edit summary, but the last revision had none so bad mixup I guess. But then again you [A registered editor] did'nt leave an edit summary too
why blame the poor little guy? Sohambanerjee1998 10:45, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
- I am guilty as charged. In mitigation, I have maintained a 100% WP:ES record since September 2011, and in this instance, seeing the STiki tag, I left it for the "automatic rollbacker" to do its thing!
Cheers! — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 11:13, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
- I am guilty as charged. In mitigation, I have maintained a 100% WP:ES record since September 2011, and in this instance, seeing the STiki tag, I left it for the "automatic rollbacker" to do its thing!
- Yes it was a fault on my part considering the edit summary, but the last revision had none so bad mixup I guess. But then again you [A registered editor] did'nt leave an edit summary too
- Concur. IPs rarely leave an edit summary, but I had previously thought of pruning the article in a similar manner. Best wishes, — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 10:37, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
"Normally, only one official link is included. If the subject of the article has more than one official website, then more than one link may be appropriate, under a very few limited circumstances.[8] However, Wikipedia does not provide a comprehensive web directory to every official website." is the official consensus of the project. Any WP:LOCALCONSENSUS would need to have articulated a clear improvement to the encyclopedia before it ignored the rules. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:13, 22 November 2013 (UTC)