User talk:Vargatamas

Image tagging for Image:Szentmiklos.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Szentmiklos.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:09, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Szentmiklos2.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Szentmiklos2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:06, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Islam in Hungary[edit]

Can you please move your additions to the main Islam in Hungary article? Also, Gesta Hungarorum is supposed to have invented some of his history.Misheu 21:35, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Almakerek2.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Almakerek2.JPG. The copy called Image:Almakerek2.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 22:30, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Almakerek3.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Almakerek3.JPG. The copy called Image:Almakerek3.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 22:45, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unrotated pictures[edit]

The person who places pictures on their sides needs to go to an optician. -- 91.104.104.25 03:21, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Szentmiklos.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Szentmiklos.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:06, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Almakerek3.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Almakerek3.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:40, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, how can I process I took all pictures recently uploaded 2007 July at the location obviously —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Vargatamas (talk • contribs) 22:24:33, August 19, 2007 (UTC).

Pictures[edit]

Please upload your images to the Commons so all language wikis can use them. It is particularly important in your case since presumably the Romanian wiki would like to use them.
An orphaned image such as Prazsmar2.jpg is almost useless since no one will ever see it. If you upload to the Commons, as a minimum, apply a category to the image.
The mediawiki software is very clever at re-sizing images but it does not know how to rotate them (or about the rotation flag that Panasonic supports). So please follow the advice of my friend above and rotate portrait images before uploading. You don't need to buy photoshop - you probably got a basic image editor with your camera. I have rotated some for you but I have left a couple for you to do.
Please provide at least a minimal description for each image. You don't need to go into the sort of detail as with Coal tax obelisk N003 569x.jpg but as a minimum you need to provide a few words saying what the photo is of and stating explicitly that you took it (which is not the same as you being the copyright holder).
Use the {{self|author=...}} licence tag see Almakerek7.jpg. This matters with the ones I have rotated - I claim absolutely no credit or rights for what I have done.
By an interesting twist, Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp. says that Almakerek3.jpg and similar should be tagged {{PD-art}} because the copyright on the mural has long expired! I won't insist but you must make it clear that it is a photo that you took of a mural.

Thanks, I will rotate, all my photos, the problem with romanian wiki, that they write absolute historical nonsense in their articles. Transylvania never mentioned being partg of Hungary, but always seems independent, Dracula, Wallachian Voivode coins money in Hungary (article Sigisoara), which is nonsense, Hungary being very strict on coinage right of the king, refer to neutral Oxford literature. They state as fact assumptions of some dobious historians. In wiki also they building they own past in the former Hungarian part. It is a long debate to you need some time to invest. I do not state the HU historians are always right, but historical documents at least have to be respected always. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Vargatamas (talk • contribs) 20:31:20, August 19, 2007 (UTC).

-- RHaworth 07:55, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above may seem a bit daunting and technical but please take the time to read it - it is all sound advice. Just to show that you have noticed it, please answer this question: what is your objection to uploading to the Commons? To set you an example, I have transferred Almakerek8.jpg to the Commons for you. Please add to the description, the date the image was taken. -- RHaworth 05:24, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I seem to be wasting my breath. Item 3 above was totally non-controversial: we do not upload portrait images lying on their sides. You appear to have read my message below re Lutheranism, why are you ignoring this? I have deleted Image:Rugonfalva1.jpg because it was not rotated. I shall continue to delete it if you upload it without roitation. What is the problem? -- RHaworth 19:39, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(Incidentally, are you left-handed? People normally rotate the camera 90 degrees clockwise for portrait shots. -- RHaworth 19:47, 19 August 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Names[edit]

Please, don't create articles about Transylvanian villages under Hungarian names. As a general rule every Romanian village should be under the Romanian name, even the ones with Hungarian ethnic majority. As a compromise between Hung. and Romanian users we are using bilingual leads in these cases, see Székelyudvarhely as an example. Best wishes. Zello 02:02, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was very forward-thinking of the Transylvanians to build a Lutheran church in Mălâncrav in the 14th century! Seriously, please add a note of what breed of Christianity it was originally. -- RHaworth 05:24, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In your way of thinking Cantenbury cannot be Anglican either. I think it is obvious what was built before Reformation was Catholic. You can add this notes to Trondheim gothic cathedral, all English churches etc. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Vargatamas (talk • contribs) 20:21:03, August 19, 2007 (UTC).

I assume this edit is your reply. Thank you. -- RHaworth 19:39, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 22:26, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

20th August

how to upload to the common? --Vargatamas 22:49, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Follow this link. Create an Id for yourself then follow the link again. Uploading is just the same as here. (and thanks for rotating) -- RHaworth 08:44, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! I created the user, and I upload the pics to common as soon I have some more time. I would like to ask your assistance in the article Bran my HU name was undone, and I cannot put my comment on it. I think it is useful, because it helps the search if someone knows only the HU name, 2) HUans also live there and it is historically part of Hu as any Königsberg and Kant is German although it is in Russia, Thank you,--Vargatamas 17:40, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

clear now, thanks, I just wanted to put as it is all articles--Vargatamas 10:07, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The problem was more that you put the HU name very crudely at the top of the article. I am pleased to see that it has now been put in for you properly. What does "I cannot put my comment on it" mean? See also my talk page re your merge request. -- RHaworth 03:22, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lead[edit]

Creating village stubs, which is indeed a very useful contribution to wikipedia, you should follow general rules about formatting the lead. Always put the official name in the first place with bold letters, than the alternative names in brackets and in Italic. Take a look at my changes in the case of Hărman. Zello 15:14, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Köszönom! Par percem volt csak ra, es volt nehany fotom. Nem szantam ra tobb idot, csak sajnaltam hogy nics fenn semmi. Gondoltam, hogy eleg szep templomok vannak arra, es erdemes ide feltenni. Ha nem is az oshonos nemzetei is. Mellesleg az az egy ketto pravoszlav romankori templom nincs is fenn az oslakosok reszerol, amit erdmes lenne feltenni, csak a szazadfordulos csodak. errol jut eszembe, prazsmarrol van egy masik fotom... --Vargatamas 17:28, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Igen, vmiért a betonkatedrálisokból van fent sok, pedig van néhány igazi is. Zello 23:17, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Almakerek7.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Almakerek7.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:49, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reformed Church[edit]

Tamas, let's make a deal. You tell me where you got that information from (a book or article title), and I'll write it back in, using correct English. All right? Biruitorul 23:12, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ok, but it is part of all schoolbooks. refer to the Kingdom of Hungary there you see maps, from 1541 to 1699 Hungary from today West Croatia (Cakovec) Mid Transdanubia (Papa) Slovakis (Ersekujvar) to the east Varad/Orodea, Temesvar/Timisora, pure Ottoman. The Reformed Church was in Debrecen (Calvinist Rome). Today in the mid-Alfold regions are Calvinist dominated, except where the Hapsburgs settled Catholic Germans (Svabians) in Banat, around Budapest, around Villany, Szekszard, and mid Transdanubia e.g. Mor and Slovakians in Bekes,in today Voivodina. They created the Greek Catholic Church for Rumanians and Rusins to increase on paper the number of Catholics. Only Hungarians remained Catholics in this regions are those in Jaszsag, and of bishopric Eger and neighborhood. Now is late here, but send some web/official sources.

That is a very informative answer and you clearly know a lot about the subject. However, as you are fairly new to Wikipedia, there are is something very important I should explain. We work with reliable sources: see here for details. Unfortunately, "all schoolbooks" is not reliable under our policy - we need the name of a specific book. I don't know how much the Hungarian Wikipedia's policy on this differs, but see hu:Wikipédia:Megbízható források for their statement. I've asked User:Zello to help you out some more. Biruitorul 01:09, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unitarian villages[edit]

Hi! I prefer to use English as we are supposed to so that nobody thinks we have secrets. :) They want to delete the category you created because it is not quite precise to say that a village (or commune) itself is Unitarian. The best way to convey the information that the majority of a village's population is Unitarian is to (1) include it in a list about such villages inside the Unitarian Church of Transylvania article, as suggested by Johnbod, and (2) to say so in the article about the village, e.g. under a "Demographics" heading (with a proper reference; preferably to the latest census). As a side note, the vast majority of Romanian editors around here are very sensible, so you can assume good faith on their part and thus avoid being bitten. :) Have a nice day, K issL 10:12, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images[edit]

I see you uploaded some pictures on St. Michael Church in Cluj. First of all I think they are very beautiful. Would it be ok if these images would be uploaded to wikipedia commons so that they would be available to other wikipedias also? In case you don't know, commons is a data base with media that can be used in articles on all wikipedias. This way the pictures could be used in the German, French, Romanian, Hungarian wikipedias and any other wikipedia. R O ^{A M A T A A}| msg 17:42, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you could do I certainly do not mind. I always have problem with the commons, and only 50% successful and always in hurry. I try to reupload them whenever I have time.--Vargatamas 18:59, 18 September 2007 (UTC) thanks for the comment, the beauty is thanks to the builders, and the camera makers.., what you prefer just use or indicate--Vargatamas 20:05, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I know. The theory of continuity is not based on any facts or sources. It is just nationalistic myth. Regards.Yeti 14:51, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Hungary[edit]

The project page is now at Wp:WikiProject Hungary. Cheers. Hobartimus (talk) 00:50, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Categories[edit]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categorization

Here you will find some help. Zello (talk) 20:34, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Petrus Ransamus[edit]

A tag has been placed on Petrus Ransamus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Jb0007 (talk) 13:08, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Forgách Ferenc[edit]

A tag has been placed on Forgách Ferenc requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Jb0007 (talk) 13:09, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Istvánffy Miklós[edit]

A tag has been placed on Istvánffy Miklós requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Jb0007 (talk) 13:09, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Baranyai Decsi János[edit]

A tag has been placed on Baranyai Decsi János requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Jb0007 (talk) 13:09, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Szamosközy István[edit]

A tag has been placed on Szamosközy István requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Jb0007 (talk) 13:10, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Szamosközy István[edit]

I have replaced your "I'm working on it!" note with an {{underconstruction}} tag, which will have the effect you want. But even that will only protect it for a few days: if you are going to be some time about developing the article, you might do better to work on it off-line or in a user sub-page (see WP:UP#How do I create a user subpage?), and only put it in as an article when it is ready. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 21:08, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Gyulafehervar.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Gyulafehervar.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:05, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:John Hunyadi, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 18:24, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Protestant Reformation. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Cognate247 (talk) 01:41, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation[edit]

Your upload of File:Almakerek5.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:43, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Almakerek6.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:42, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Almakerek9.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:43, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Almakerek7.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:44, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Almakerek1.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:42, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Almakerek11.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:42, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Almakerek3.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:42, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Almakerek4.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:44, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Berethalomx.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:14, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Berethalomx.jpg missing description details[edit]

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Berethalomx.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:35, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]