Jump to content

User talk:Varisara.spy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

online training[edit]

Please complete online student training at https://dashboard.wikiedu.org/training/students You must login and complete all five basic modules. (Wikipedia policies, ..., Finding your article) After completion of these module, we will be able to see that you have edited at least three pages on the English Wikipedia.

Special:Contributions/Varisara.spy at this time shows that you have not finished:

  • sandbox [1] (N.B. Please do not click "Submit your draft for review!". The function is not applicable to our course.)
  • be bold [2]
  • talk page tutorial [3]

You need to be logged in on a desktop platform, so that your contributions are recorded under your account. The links above take you straight into the pages where you can launch interactive tutorials. We expect to see you create three new pages during the this training exercise. --Taweetham (talk) 19:59, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a reminder that you have not complete the assignment. Please complete it as soon as possible to remain in our program. --Taweetham (talk) 11:58, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have completed all 3 modules already. Varisara.spy (talk) 14:00, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Spy. Your have gone through the slides and answered the multiple-choice questions. However, you have not completed the interactive tutorials. Please use the links above to complete the tasks. --Taweetham (talk) 16:17, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This is a reminder that you have not complete the assignment. Please complete it as soon as possible to remain in our program. --Taweetham (talk) 17:37, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please check I think I have done 3 of them properly? Varisara.spy (talk) 08:28, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Topic proposal[edit]

Please propose a topic or two that you wish to write on Wikipedia. You should read all related articles/policies on Wikipedia and provide the following information.

  1. Your proposed article(s) (New or existing STUB article relating to a chemical compound, reaction, equipment or technique - or related to your major/interest. (see Category:Stub-Class Chemistry articles))
    • For new article, explain briefly why it passes WP:NOTE.
    • For existing topics, explain briefly the state/structure of the current article.
      • Is the structure & existing content appropriate?
        • If not, restructure or remove content as per WP:MOS and WP:NOT before you move to the next stage.
  2. Brief outline of your contributions to the article
    • In what section & what content
      • Make sure it belongs to the article and it is encyclopedic. See WP:NOT for things that should NOT be added.
      • Make sure that it is not redundant to existing articles. Use Google search "site:wikipedia.org" rather than Wikipedia search.
    • References for the article
    • Media files (photo/VDO/drawing) to be used in the article.
      • You may suggest plan to create your own work and upload to Wikimedia Commons
      • You may use existing media on Wikimedia Commons. Use Google image search "site:wikimedia.org" rather than Wikimedia Commons search.
  3. Examples/template/related articles that you will use as a model to develop your nominated article.
    • In terms of WP:MOS/formatting - your article will have similar style/format/tone to these articles.
    • In terms of content - your article will link to or will be linked from these articles.

Please leave your answer below. (Leave a reply in this section of your talkpage.) --Taweetham (talk) 20:06, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your topic, Laboratory tube sent by email is accepted. --Taweetham (talk) 09:10, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

First draft[edit]

Your topic is approved and added to the course page. Please develop the proposal into the first draft in your sandbox.

  • For existing article, you may copy some parts of the existing article to your sandbox to see how revision/integration of content would work. You will copy the code back to the article at later stage.
  • For new article, you may want to copy parts of a template article to your sandbox to see what sections are necessary. The sandbox will be moved to the article namespace at later stage. Please do not click "Submit your draft for review!". The function is not applicable to our course.

In all cases, do not copy more than what is necessary. For example, do not copy any categories to your sandbox. --Taweetham (talk) 20:14, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft is borderline but I let you pass this time. You need to provide references to support your writing. --Taweetham (talk) 00:47, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

First edit on the article namespace[edit]

Your work has been reviewed. Majority of the content/formatting is ok. Please carefully move encyclopedic part of your sandbox to article namespace so that the general public can see it. Here are some tips to help you complete the transition to online editing.

  1. Content/Formatting policies
  2. Technicalities
    • Unlike sandbox, all edits will be public immediately and it is important to make sure that all of your edits are acceptable. You may use preview button and provide edit summary to help you.
    • Any "page save" on Wikipedia even outside article namespace is permanently recorded and can be retrieved by the public. Please think carefully before you click save and before you revert other people edits. No work is lost but only the latest version of the page is shown to the public. Deletion of pages (or versions of pages) is only possible by admins if it falls under Wikipedia:Deletion policy. You can request admins to do deletion or other prescribed tasks should the need arises.
    • You may want to set watchlist and notifications so that you can catch up with changes made to your article and your talk page by other editors.
  3. Community interactions
    • You will be interacting with other volunteers when you make edits on the article namespace. Please respect other users in the community and assume good faith.
    • If your work is reverted or modified in any other ways, do not engage in a edit war. Rather use discussion page of your article to settle issues.
    • You may be blocked from Wikipedia for failure to observe community rules.

We hope you enjoy seeing product of your hard work read by many people in the years to come. --Taweetham (talk) 00:47, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi from your reviewer[edit]

Hello Varisara.spy, welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to be your reviewer for the ICCH224 course. Please feel free to contact me via my talk page if you have any questions about anything. Cheers, --Pilarbini (talk) 06:57, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted edits[edit]

Please see the article's https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Laboratory_tube&action=history. You need to have proper references and the content must be encyclopedic. --Taweetham (talk) 05:53, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do you want to change your topic? Try Spouted Can (Eureka can) instead? --Taweetham (talk) 06:59, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Why can’t I continue working on “lab tube”? Varisara.spy (talk) 07:49, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
May I change to “Foodomics” instead since it’s also related to my major? Varisara.spy (talk) 11:52, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. Please change and work on this new topic asap. --Taweetham (talk) 13:55, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have already moved my article to public page. If it is deleted to become less than 1000 bytes, will I be kicked out? Varisara.spy (talk) 03:41, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please have a look at my article and see if everything is alright? I have already changed what you told me during the lab, but I just want to make sure that my article will not be deleted again. Thank you.

Comments on foodomics article[edit]

Hello Varisara.spy,

Thank you for your contribution on foodomics article, this is indeed a fascinating field. Here are some suggestions.

General comments: Overall it is well written, but consider reorganizing the content by dividing it into clear sections with each paragraph supporting the same main idea.

Specific comments:

  • Consider removing first part of this sentence as it is similar to the first sentence "Foodomics, in which its suffix -omics refers to a study of science, requires the combination of food chemistry, biological science, and data analysis."
    • And this would make a good second sentence
  • Move sentences around so that the year is in chronological order
  • Don't think that the " four main areas of omics" need to be in a list. I would make it into one sentence.
    • OR it could be good to keep the list and add short description about each area
  • The major aims of the development of Foodomics deserves its own section as it doesn't really belong to the advantages section.

Hope you find this useful, feel free to contact me if you have further questions. --Pilarbini (talk) 10:37, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have already adjusted some of it but I'm not really sure if that's what you meant. Could you please have a look? And for a short description, I have only put in only 2 from 4, just for you to have a look first if that's what you suggested. If that's right, I'll put in the rest.

Thank you so much

@Varisara.spy: I rearranged the content and also edited the structure for short description. Please use the code {{ping|Pilarbini}} to notify me and also don't forget to use --~~~~ to sign your comments :D --Pilarbini (talk) 07:45, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contribution to the article.

  1. Please watch for edits made to the article by other Wikipedians. On the history page, you will be able to see their comments and changes.
  2. Please provide edit summary every time you save a page.
  3. Please carefully read WP:NOT and make sure that your article has an encyclopedia tone.
  4. Please format your references properly. For example, use {{cite journal}} for the cover page citation.'

Please have a look at similar articles on Wikipedia e.g. Transcriptomics technologies and links from List_of_omics_topics_in_biology and learn from these examples. --Taweetham (talk) 03:20, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tag[edit]

@pilarbini If I got tags that say clarification needed and dubious, can I just go ahead and edit my article while deleting the tags? Is it appropriate? --Varisara.spy

Meetup[edit]

You are invited to the meet up. --Taweetham (talk) 08:32, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Varisara.spy&oldid=830676610"