User talk:Veera Narayana/2014 Archives
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
A cup of coffee for you!
|
Belated Happy New Year Wishes to U & Ur Family Pavan. Sorry ! for the Late :( Regards, Raghusri (talk) 10:21, 2 January 2014 (UTC) |
Thanks
Thank you so much for Understanding me Pavan :)
Regards,
Raghusri (talk) 10:08, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
1 New poster
Thank you Pavan :). Yes, existing version has a Watermark, i know but i am waiting for the another poster. In Correct Situation, You did the right thing :) It's looking Nice. Where did you find that ?
Regards,
Raghusri (talk) 10:05, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
O.K. Pavan :) Raghusri (talk) 12:27, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Yevadu poster
Thank you so much Pavan. Actually i didn't noticed it. You did the right thing. A film image must have Prod., Details in Wiki. If somebody else had noticed this they would have tagged it with FFD template. Thank you so much :)
Regards,
Raghusri (talk) 11:41, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Pavan, you have uploaded another an image ? Although Wiki is not the Someone's Property but I am there for Uploading other images as Newer versions. I'll take care of them and also i am not disturbing yours uploaded images. O.K. Take it Positively :)
Regards,
Raghusri (talk) 12:18, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
1: Nenokkadine
Thank you so much Pavan for adding the Story. Had you made that Info., or any Website's Content. Whatever it may be it's Very good (Very Good Contribution) :D :D :D
Regards,
Raghusri (talk) 10:57, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thank U for adding the plot to the article. But the plot is too long. The objective of a summary is to condense a large amount of information into a short, accessible format. It is not to reproduce the experience of reading or watching the story, nor to cover every detail. So, cut out as much as possible or restore the older version which is 'Just fine'. regards, DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 16:15, 18 January 2014 (UTC).
Aagadu
O.K. I understood :D, Thank you. Raghusri (talk) 15:45, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
Aagadu (New)
First of all, i don't have any Intention to Hurt you, O.K. Please don't deviate from the Topic. Comparing with other articles is not a Good thing and moreover that was happened a long ago. It is difficult to remember that, Those contributions to SVSC were may be, made by me or Somebody else! But once if i check the Contributions, i can get the Clarity. Then only, i can say if the Fault is mine or the Others. I've so many times argued with some users. But who cared me! So After getting Frustration i stopped arguing because of no use regarding this Topic. If you have any doubts regarding the "Wiki is not a Newspaper" matter please check the Following link and Read thoroughly : Wikipedia is not a newspaper. Finally, one thing : A Confusion has raised regarding " Whether PR is one of the Cast in the Film or not". So that only i reverted those and also i mentioned in one of my edit summaries that, " The TOAP source posted a QM (?), so we cannot believe it as an Official Info., ". You told me that you changed the Mirchi9 - - > TOI. It is good. But regarding the TOAP source, i am Correct, no Doubt in that. Past is past, we have to be Careful in Present and in Future. May be you, me (or) some other Fellow users made some mistakes. Comparing is totally wrong in some Situations, it will become as, going beyond the Topic we are Discussing about. O.K.
Regards,
Raghusri (talk) 10:55, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
edit warring
Hello Im jeffrd10 I can see that you are in a dispute with TheRedpenofdoom and Are currently warring. I would like to remind you of the three revert rule and to remind you not to do more than 3 reverts in 24 hours or I will report you. I also see no attempt at conceses so please instead of warring try to reach consensus on the article's talk page. Thank You.--Jeffrd10 (talk) 14:28, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- WP:PROVEIT does apply, you have simply shown that they are on the web, but have not provided any evidence that they actually meet our reliable source criteria. And yes, there is a LOT of crap that needs to be removed from a lot of articles because they also use inappropriate websites as "sources". However, that is not a justification to keep crap on the Heart Attack article. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 11:23, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
Heart Attack
Hello,
Pavan :D Yeah ! I am doing well, Thank you. First of all see my user page to know, to which articles i am contributing daily !, because that Respective article is not in my Watchlist & coming to the Matter : 123T, Idlebrain & Apherald Sources are surely Reliable because 123T is Managed by Famous "Mallemala Entertainments PVT., LTD.," and "Jeevi" is a Famous "Reviewer" from so many years in Idlebrain and Apherald is also a Famous Film news Source. If that Respective user Objects then please Open a Disc., in that Article's Talk page. But don't engage in Edit war. If you both violate WP:3RR, then One of the Admin's will surely Block you & Please read this : WP:PROVEIT. If you want to report that user to WP:AIV then Enable Twinkle Gadget in you Preferences and Click on the above Right side's TW Tab. Please do it.
Regards,
Raghusri (talk) 11:49, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
O.K. Thank you Understanding :D Raghusri (talk) 10:07, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Heart Attack
You left a comment at TheRedPenOfDoom's talk page, where you state Please help in these matters. If there is indeed such a list or restriction, we may avoid using them., could you explain what you mean by "we" in that sentence, are you sharing your account, or are you editing on behalf of another person, company or organisation ? Nick (talk) 13:43, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
Non free posters
To answer your question, non-free images can have a size of upto 290 pixels. Below 250 will make them look too tiny. That is why I uploaded bigger versions of the posters which were not more than 220 pixels. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:06, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Durga film
Sorry to tell you that your article actually wasn't reviewed, the editor who said it was evidently was on a spree telling people at the right of 5 a minute at times that their articles had been reviewed. Dougweller (talk) 18:38, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Bhakta Prahladha move
Hi, I'd like u to take part in this discussion. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:10, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
The Red Pen of Doom
I know the Red Pen of Doom has a penchant for edit warring with other users, and I too don't like him. But I request you not to lengthen your wars with him because that may lead to you being blocked. Instead, you can report him to administrators, providing evidence of his actions. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:14, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
What to include?
What should be included is encyclopedic content from reliable sources that does not serve it's primary purpose in providing free advertorial buzz for the film.
That other people may "hate" me because I want them to also abide by Wikipedia's policies and not turn Wikipedia into a free publicity machine dedicated to celebrity gossip and promotion is something I am prepared to live with. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 15:14, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
hello
basu manam manam oka rashtram vallam iddaram bapanollam, aa arava rastram vallu, cinema ni next samvatsaranga choopinchi, dakshina desam lo modati matalu unna chitram manadi kaadu ani nirupinchadaaniki prayatnistunnaru, meeru nannu samarthisthe vaallani aapagalamu... Marchoctober (talk) 20:21, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Bhakta Prahladha move
You're Welcome :) Raghusri (talk) 09:54, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the star
Hi, sorry just now I saw the "Tireless Contributor Barnstar" that u awarded me. So thank u very much! And I think u know that Kalidas (film) (my nomination) recently passed its GA review. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:38, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Manam (film)
I love your work done on this article. Keep going :D. If you need any help do write back on my talk page.
Arjann (talk) 08:23, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Hidden comment
Hello Pavan :), Those were added because of knowing other users at which time the citation is added & accessed by someone! That's it & it is Neither necessary nor unnecessary to add :D
Aagadu poster
Hello Pavan,
How are you ?
First of all thank you for Uploading an image for Aagadu article.
I've just modified the resolution of the poster uploaded by you according to Image Resolution.
I hope you can understand.
Regards,
Raghusri (talk) 09:37, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Need some help to modify some celebrity pages
Dear Pavan,
We a Hyderabad based celebrity management company. Some of our celeb wiki pages are with wrong data like year of birth and movie details. can you help us in creating semi-protected for our celeb wiki pages.
We can provide you all required data.
Thanks
Prabhakar Vega Entertainment — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vegacelebs (talk • contribs) 14:22, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
KATHTHI
Removed unencyclopedic language. looks better now. only matters about soundtrack is needed. Harirajmohanhrm (talk) 12:41, 2 August 2014 (UTC).
Aagadu
stop your fan pov pushing on your favourite movie. write what is there in the source. only performances were praised reviews were not extremely decent. I am also Mahesh Babu fan that doesn't mean you change negative reviews to positives. I did not do any test edits, think and comment. I have retained your edits as well. Bewakoofian (talk) 15:05, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Aagadu
Hii thanks for your message, glad that at least you are ready to discuss. My intention is not to blame you. I was only undoing other people's disruptive edits. I just cant understand why some users (not you) use wikipedia to promote their favourite films, and try to compare their film with pawan kalyan film, and try to change negative and mixed reviews to positive reviews. The official first day collection of aagadu released by Times of India is 9.23 cr from andhra pradesh and telangana (http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/telugu/movies/news/Mahesh-Babus-Aagadu-first-day-collections/articleshow/42981561.cms). It collected around 5 cr in U.S. and these figures were released few hours back. But some user have already listed dummy figures from unreliable sources. This is where Iam having problem. The film minted less than attarintiki daaredi first day collection,but some mahesh babu fans cant accept it. Telugu audience should stop watching these masala films as soon as possible. Bewakoofian (talk) 12:41, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
page protection
I am the one requested page protection, because I am just not interested to revert and edit war, at the same time as I have explained to u in my earlier message, i believe in facts and relaible sources Bewakoofian (talk) 12:49, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
Hey bro, u might wanna reckon making Ram Charan's GAV a GA article, like Bommarillu :) Ssven2 (talk) 13:56, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
- It has the potential, I'll help you in copy-editing the article. U have to wait for its theatrical run to end (like say around November 2014, when it crosses 50-75 days landmark). The box office collections would be stable then, that's the reason. Once u feel u are ready to nominate it, submit it the WP:GOCE for any further copy-editing (as per the formality). Once any of the GOCE members have done their copy-editing, u can pass up for a GA nomination.U can take my submission of Chandramukhi and info regarding it on my talk page as a reference. Also, ask Kailash29792, he would help u too. Ssven2 (talk) 14:16, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
- Review from 123 - http://www.123telugu.com/reviews/govindudu-andarivadele-telugu-movie-review.html and from Behindwoods - http://behindwoods.com/telugu-movies/govindudu-andarivadele/govindudu-andarivadele-review.html Ssven2 (talk) 14:30, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
It would be good if we both archive all the references as that would prevent WP:Link rot. 
Archive websites
http://www.webcitation.org/archive
Ssven2 (talk) 12:59, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
Better poster. Thanks. Can u help me in archiving the references. Ssven2 (talk) 12:59, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
- Bro, I noticed you have written the page like "It was reported that" and "Revealed that". You can try to replace those by just stating the main point in the references u find. It is an important tip for getting the article to GA status :) Ssven2 (talk)
I don't think so, no :) Ssven2 (talk)
- Yep, final version. Is at 693 words exactly. Before trimming, it was around 1200 words :) Ssven2 (talk)
I have created the article on wikipedia. :D. U can develop the article by using info regarding it from other sources, especially newspaper and magazines. Ssven2 (talk) 14:16, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
- BTW, also created an article for Idlebrain.com. :D Ssven2 (talk) 11:53, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
Aagadu
Rv plot was not removed by me, and stop adding unreliable sources to promote your favourite film Bhishek (talk) 05:04, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Edit history
I did not deliberately removed Plot. That is what I am saying was a mistake. But you mean to say what ever one India and filmi beat say is true. And you also mean to say aagadu grossed 200 crores? what is this non sense I cant undertand. why a mahesh babu film cannot get average reviews and cannot be a average run. every film of his should be a hit and telugu fans like u cant sleep without promoting it ? regarding box office figures only national news papers, Hindu and Times are acceptable. we will not allow any other local sources, especially on film box office figures. If u do so it is vandalism Bhishek (talk) 05:11, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Aagadu shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard Bhishek (talk) 05:15, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Your info included
I have included your info on the introduction of article Bhishek (talk) 05:35, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
I have repaired the junk of references
You are welcome to add anything freshly, dont undo what I did, because I have fixed bare templates and URls Bhishek (talk) 05:57, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
fan pov pushing
please stop your advertisements on Aagadu, The film is box office average Bhishek (talk) 18:12, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
- Pavan, I am very much convinced that "Bhishek" is actually a sockpuppet of User:Padmalakshmisx as he, much like Padma, has a penchant for attacking other users in improper English while adding multiple sections to the attacked user's talk pages. Please report him here. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:34, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar |
| For your impressive work on developing Telugu film articles. Keep it up! —Ssven2 (talk) 10:32, 1 November 2014 (UTC) |
Remove the references in the lead section (The section at the top of the article) (NOT INFOBOX) as per WP:LEAD and fill up their details in their respective sections. Example, references regarding Box Office collections can be added in "Box Office" section of the article. Ssven2 (talk) 08:18, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
- Just add the reason for your edits while editing and mention WP:LEAD. He won't delete it. But you can rephrase the words in the heading if you want to. You can remove the "The film was one of the highly successful Telugu films" part and replace it with "The film became one of the highest grossing Telugu films of 2014."
Ssven2 (talk) 22:30, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
Great job with the article. Hope you take an epic film like this to GA (Even FA is possible). But first take it to GA. You want me to help with some copy-editing? Ssven2 (talk) 03:32, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- BTW, you can add a "Themes" and "Legacy" section. "Themes" where you can explain about the various subplot themes and mainplot themes in the film. In "Legacy" you can mention the film's significance. Also you can find out any bibliographical (book) sources. You can use Mughal-e-Azam, Sholay or even Chandralekha for reference, meaning that you can look at the style of writing in these articles and try to implement it in Maghadheera. Ssven2 (talk) 07:35, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Okay then. Well, regarding the usage of IndiaGlitz, i sincerely tried to find alternative source and i got a very very less support from Sify, Rediff and Oneindia. Behindwoods was zero. Deccan Chronicle was almost useless. And forget TOI and The Hindu. At least something related to VFX was available from the latter. And info from Idlebrain was more of film making information published post release. Thus, with no other options available, i had to opt for IndiaGlitz. So, mostly i may not remove them for the time being. But if i find something reliable than it, at least relating to one fact, i will surely replace it. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 08:01, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- Behindwoods may now satisfy WP:RS as it has an article on Wikipedia. If only Idlebrain's article had stayed... Kailash29792 (talk) 08:16, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Idlebrain.com may stay. It was considered reliable and reporters from CNN-IBN say the same in an article published in moneycontrol. But i was late. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 08:21, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- That reference should be in "Distribution" as "Legacy" explains the impact caused by the film, look at the articles I mentioned above to get an idea. Ssven2 (talk) 03:35, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Done. Added it in Release partly and Distribution partly while i added some information about the film's legacy with reference to the articles stated by you before and will also add about the weapons auction shortly. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 05:52, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Ssven2, i added the info about the film's legacy which was available on the Internet with reference to the specifications you gave to me. Please copy-edit it if required. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 11:13, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- I will try taking care of it. And Pavan, is the article complete enough to request a GOCE edit? Kailash29792 (talk) 11:44, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Kailash29792, Just few more edits regarding the info i have and the article is done. Then i will submit a GA nomination. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:23, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Done with it. Just creating an article on Idlebrain.com is left. Tomorrow i will submit the noimination. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:57, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Idlebrain.com created. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:46, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Kailash29792, Ssven2, i submitted my request at GOCE today for Magadheera. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 03:13, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
- Good. Did you know that in the film, the year of Kala Bhairava and Ranadev Billa is written as 1609 BC, while the reviews read 1609 AD? I guess the film is wrong, because the BC axis goes in reverse, and "400 years later" cannot mean present day. What do we do? Kailash29792 (talk) 17:03, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Ah! That is a really bad cinematic liberty. I just checked the film. It starts off as BC 1609, Aravali hills, Bhairavakona and once the lead pair dies, it shows 400 years later and the present (2009) is shown. Thus, one option is to adhere with SSR by writing 400 years later or by mentioning the years. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 01:52, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
Good. You can also try making old Telugu films like Mayabazar, Tenali Ramakrishna (film) and Donga Ramudu GA. BTW, did you add a themes section yet? U can use the critics reviews and make up a section like how I used IANS's review for the "Themes" section in VIP. Ssven2 (talk) 03:27, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
- As for the BC AD thing, Just stick to AD as Kailash pointed out, the film is wrong. :) Ssven2 (talk) 03:31, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
Alright. The plot mentions it as just 1609. Thus let it be assumed that it is AD. And coming to Themes, VIP was very useful. I have only info about these things. first one, the film's theme. second, the film's screenplay in simple words by SSR. third, commercial pay-offs SSR opted for in this film. fourth, changes made in the bound script for simple narration. fifth and last, critics reviews. out of 5, 4 are from a single source. Can these be a part of the article's Themes section ? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 05:20, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
And as of the next project for GA, changes for GAV are pending. And Manam is on the pipeline after completing Magadheera and GAV as for Telugu cinema, it is an untouched and path breaking concept. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 05:26, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
- What is that note in the plot summary for? I think it can be removed as plots anyway cover only the major points. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:53, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
Problem is, IPs and other users are repeatedly adding the introduction scenes of the film and also other trivial scenes. I added that note only to maintain stability so that they will stop adding those points in the future after seeing this note at least. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 06:40, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
- Yes they can be a part of the "Themes" section. Just write what you have and if there is any copy editing needed, I'll help you with it. Ssven2 (talk) 08:04, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
Ssven2, Thanks a lot for the copy editing for "Themes and Influence". I forgot to use the book you gave me though i checked it the day you gave. It was because of few technical internet issues back at home. Anyways, thanks for adding them. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 05:03, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
- I just wanted to ask: though I have seen the film, I am not completely sure whether it classifies as a nonlinear narrative film. Do you think it does? Kailash29792 (talk) 09:27, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
Basically, the film's screenplay is inspired from Alfred Hitchcock's works where the film starts with an incident which reveals the plot, while the rest of the film tries to give a conclusion. Magadheera starts with a sequence from the past and the rest is an array of scenes connecting with that sequence. Moreover if we observe the film's interval block, hero enters the competition but the initial portions of second half explains all incidents prior to that sequence. Thus, with these two observations, i think the film has a nonlinear narration. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 10:09, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
However if films like Eeram and Sarvam are considered as non linear narratives, then i cant say Magadheera is completely a non linear narrative film. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 10:13, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
To Pavanjandhyala (and the other editors interested in the article!), I have completed a copy-edit of the article as per the GOCE request, but have left several questions and concerns on the film talk page. If someone can help me with them, I think the article will be in good shape for a GA. kara❈talk 06:21, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Pavan, read Wikipedia:Good article nominations/Instructions, especially Step 2, in order to know how to nominate the article for GA. Ssven2 (talk) 06:36, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Thanks a ton. Will refer to it after returning from my taxation examination. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 06:41, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Pavan, you can request people to review the article. You can ask someone who knows Telugu articles well. Ssven2 (talk) 17:00, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
- I requested DRAGON BOOSTER to review it. Hope he considers to do so. Lets wait and see. :) Pavanjandhyala (talk) 05:26, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
Of course, but let DRAGON BOOSTER respond. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 06:17, 5 December 2014 (UTC) Ssven2 I also messaged to Vensatry whether he would review the article. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:24, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
- Re: Hii ! Pavanjandhyala, Thanks for asking me for GA review on Magadheera. I was on a Wiki-break and couldn't reply. However, it's a GA now, congrats on your GA success and your impressive work. Happy editing! regards, DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 20:09, 31 December 2014 (UTC).
- Re: Hii ! Pavanjandhyala, Thanks for asking me for GA review on Magadheera. I was on a Wiki-break and couldn't reply. However, it's a GA now, congrats on your GA success and your impressive work. Happy editing!
Bro, I am pleased to inform you that the article has passed its GA review. My first GA success and my first success as wikipedia editor. Ssven2 (talk) 07:45, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
This film, which I have nominated for GA has also passed its review. Ssven2 (talk) 09:02, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
Uploading Pictures
Hi. Can you tell me the way how to upload pictures for a few films which have no posters. Thank you. Dineshfernandes89 (talk) 03:31, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi. The links you gave me are kind of hard to understand. Will you mind describing the process in a simple way atleast. Thank you. Dineshfernandes89 (talk) 03:31, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Hey bro, can you help me with this article I am reviweing. The nominator (User:25 Cents FC) has been absent from wikipedia since October 2014. Ssven2 speak 2 me 03:35, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
I shall do it bro. But please tell me what should i do ? Do you want me to edit the article on behalf of the nominator ? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 05:17, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
- Pavan, please don't do anything. 25 Cents nominated the article, he will finish it. If he does not, the article rightfully fails its GA review. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:57, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Translation
Hey bro! Can you translate what 'Darsaka Brahma' means as is mentioned in here? -- Sriram speak up 06:34, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Seasonal Greets!
|
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015 !!! |
|
Hello Pavanjandhyala, May you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New year 2015. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to user talk pages with a friendly message. |
NTR
Hey, Pavan. Did you just say that I love NTR. Just cause I make a lot of edits to his page and Temper, doesn't mean that I am his fan. There is one reason, I am editing Temper and the news I am providing is real. Greatandhra is a reliable source and it even shows on the top of the article whether it is gossip or real news. And the main reason why I removed Temper's release dates is because, there is 20 days of shooting left. And do you think, they can finish it about 3 days from the release and release it on time.
Magadheera GA
Hey mate! Good work. The article is long and interesting. With such detailed contents, the article deserves a FA. But, I see there are lot of issues with the prose and it is hard for me to believe that it was copyedited. FYI, an article does not need to be an GA to warrant a FAC. With some serious copy-editing and peer-review, the article has tremendous potential to become a FA. Consider it. -- Sriram speak up 05:48, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
- Btw, the film's article in Tamil wikipedia names Surya's character as Bhoopathi Varma. If it is correct, add the name to the article. -- Sriram speak up 06:01, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Magadheera
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Magadheera you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Onel5969 -- Onel5969 (talk) 14:21, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Magadheera
The article Magadheera you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Magadheera for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Onel5969 -- Onel5969 (talk) 19:41, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Congrats!
|
The Good article barnstar |
| For your GA success with Magadheera! It has 200% chance of becoming better, and eventually a FA! Kailash29792 (talk) 19:59, 28 December 2014 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
|
The Editor's Barnstar |
| For bringing Magadheera, one of the landmarks of director S. S. Rajamouli, to GA status. — Ssven2 speak 2 me 04:04, 29 December 2014 (UTC) |
What next?
After Magadheera, what is your next GA-to-be? Eega (Naan Ee in my language) or any other mega Telugu film? I would love to see someone take Mayabazar to GA status. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:59, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
- @Kailash29792: Govindudu Andarivadele is a GAN. Pavan is currently working on Dookudu. Is that right, Pavan? — Ssven2 speak 2 me 05:09, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
After completing those two, lets start Mayabazar together, if you both are willing to do so. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 06:55, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
@Kailash29792: and @Ssven2: : GAV is a GAN. So nothing much is there to do till its review starts. Today i completed Dookudu and i will nominate it for a GA tonight itself. Thus i shall start working on Mayabazar from 31 December as tomorrow i will be out of station. And i hope, you both would participate, especially the latter as he has got 2 GANs and is busy in making Padayappa a GA at present. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 07:40, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
I have finished Padayappa. Onel5969 is copyediting it at present. — Ssven2 speak 2 me 08:05, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
Icon
I have helped you add an icon to your user page stating that you are a top contributor to Magadheera. — Ssven2 speak 2 me 05:25, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
@Ssven2: Thanks bro Pavanjandhyala (talk) 07:42, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
It seems you want to get Dookudu to GA...right? Cheers, ƬheStrikeΣagle 07:43, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
@Strike Eagle: Yes, and i am nominating the same today. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 07:46, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
Would you like me to review the film? I have only made one edit. — Ssven2 speak 2 me 09:48, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
The Telugu Cinema Barnstar
|
The Telugu Cinema Barnstar
| |
| Awarded to Pavan Jandhyala for getting Magadheera to GA, thereby achieving one of the very very few GAs of Telugu Cinema! Great work! Cheers, ƬheStrikeΣagle 07:50, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
|
@Strike Eagle: Thanks a lot for the barnstar. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:08, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
- All the best for Dookudu GAN. Do let me know if you think about getting any other articles to GA in the future. I would try my best to contribute. Cheers, ƬheStrikeΣagle 09:34, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dookudu you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ssven2 -- Ssven2 (talk) 10:21, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
Happy New Year Pavanjandhyala!
Pavanjandhyala,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. — Ssven2 speak 2 me 07:42, 31 December 2014 (UTC)