User talk:Ven1031

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 8[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Simone Rapisarda Casanova, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Campbell River. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:51, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In the Garden of Forking Paths moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to In the Garden of Forking Paths. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:45, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that you are expected to respond to inquiries regarding potential conflicts of interest before making any further edits. Failure to do so will result in a loss of editing privileges. You can find our full conflict of interest guidelines at WP:COI. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 14:11, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rosguill, thank you for your intervention.

What should I do about the potential COI? And - sorry to ask - what do you mean by "respond to inquiries"? Should I respond to you, or put a note in the talk page, or will I get a questionnaire? Could you please suggest a way of dealing with this? I've checked the COI guidelines but I couldn't really find what to do.

Moreover: it's true that there is little secondary literature about the last released film by Simone Rapisarda Casanova (The article quoted in ref. 2 is by an independent reviewer, plus I found another one that I would add in the references, if I wasn't feeling threatened with "the loss of editing privileges" right now), but the author notability is quite well established, as shown by the sources quoted in the references in the article about him. So, I think that an article about his last released film is necessary.

Thank your for your help! Ven1031 (talk) 15:28, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The section WP:COIDISCLOSE of the COI guideline provides instructions for posting disclosure notices on your user talk page, and on the talk page of any affected article. It would also be helpful if you explained the nature of any COIs you may have with the subject here, and in particular whether you are financially compensated for any of your work in relation to Rapisarda Casanova.

Regarding the notability of the film, note that WP:Notability is not inherited, and that the ref 2 coverage is rather minimal (it is not a full length review, but rather a brief, if positive, mention in the context of a review of a broader film festival where the film was screened; it's not useless per-se, but it's a long way from establishing notability on its own). But the primary issue here is your apparent COI. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 15:42, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, I put all the recommended COI banners on all the articles and on my talk page, and made a declaration about not being in any way paid for my WP contributions nor having any interest in promoting the works I've been writing about. Does it help?

About notability: you decide! I tried to do my best, but I know sometimes it's not enough :D Ven1031 (talk) 18:50, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, thank you for complying so quickly. At this point you've already submitted the draft article to be reviewed, so a reviewer should take a look at it relatively soon. Currently it looks like the average wait time is < 4 weeks. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:55, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: In the Garden of Forking Paths (February 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Brachy0008 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:In the Garden of Forking Paths and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Brachy08 _(Talk) 05:41, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ven1031! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Brachy08 _(Talk) 05:41, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]