User talk:Vercetticarl/Archive3

Proposed deletion of IDON

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article IDON, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Per WP:MUSIC, forethcoming albums are not notable without substantial coverage in independent reliable sources. None provided or found for this album.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. SummerPhD (talk) 14:33, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Mi Flow: This Is It

A tag has been placed on Mi Flow: This Is It requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 19:25, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of IDON

An article that you have been involved in editing, IDON, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IDON. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 16:43, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Baby Ranks

A tag has been placed on Baby Ranks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. FlyingToaster 20:31, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Mas Flow 3

An article that you have been involved in editing, Mas Flow 3, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mas Flow 3. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 21:49, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Errexidebutalbum.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Errexidebutalbum.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:07, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Errexidebutalbum.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Errexidebutalbum.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 13:27, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with La Maravilla (album), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. [1] - SummerPhD (talk) 16:15, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of El Patrón

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article El Patrón, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non-notable future album. Fails WP:MUSIC.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. SummerPhD (talk) 16:31, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry

You have been accused of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Vercetticarl. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 17:52, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Baby Ranks

An article that you have been involved in editing, Baby Ranks, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baby Ranks. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 18:07, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Cirt (talk) 19:35, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of El Patrón

I have nominated El Patrón, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/El Patrón. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:37, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Erre XI & Luny Tunes Presents: Erre XI

Hey Vercetticarl, just came by to compliment your article creations for both Erre XI and their first album. You followed a format that should be followed in every album article on Wikipedia and you did a great job doing so. I have made some minor changes to the Luny Tunes Presents: Erre XI article, and I've even added a higher quality album image. You might get a message saying something about the image you uploaded soon, but other than that, keep up the good work! El Cangri386 ^{Sign! or Talk} 20:09, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sólido

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Sólido, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Not a notably important song. Has not charted on any major music chart.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. El cangri386 ^{Sign! or Talk} 00:12, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Errexidebutalbum.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Errexidebutalbum.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:13, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

January 2009

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Eddie Dee. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - SummerPhD (talk) 17:19, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

February 2009

IDon was redirected as the result of an AFD discussion, link to above. If you wish to recreate the article, please discuss the matter at deletion review. Thank you. - SummerPhD (talk) 20:13, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Franco "El Gorilla"

A tag has been placed on Franco "El Gorilla" requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Get to know me!} / _{Talk to me!}←at≈:→ 00:26, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Repost of El Patrón

A tag has been placed on El Patrón requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 13:47, 27 February 2009 (UTC) http://www.youtube.com/user/LosCangriInc —Preceding unsigned comment added by TruthTold (talk • contribs) 17:53, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

No personal attacks

I understand that you are frustrated with the actions of an IP editor, but leaving this kind of comment is completely unacceptable. Please attempt to remain civil and refrain from any such personal attacks in future as they will not help the situation and may only result in you being sanctioned when the other party is originally at fault. Mfield (Oi!) 00:45, 23 May 2009 (UTC)