User talk:Vercetticarl/Archive4

Speedy deletion nomination of Free Tempo[edit]

A tag has been placed on Free Tempo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 15:29, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Roberto micheletti.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Roberto micheletti.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Tom (talk - email) 03:18, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Roberto micheletti.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Roberto micheletti.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Tom (talk - email) 02:37, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war over Manuel Zelaya[edit]

Please stop your edit war with Therequiembellishere (talk · contribs) over Manuel Zelaya. Thanks.—C45207 | Talk 08:05, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for WP:3RR violation. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below.

at Manuel Zelaya, per a complaint at WP:AN3. EdJohnston (talk) 15:41, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Xiomara de zelaya.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Xiomara de zelaya.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Polly (Parrot) 17:12, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Aguasocaña.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Aguasocaña.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Polly (Parrot) 17:14, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Porfiriolobososa.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Porfiriolobososa.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Polly (Parrot) 17:14, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Comisionadovicepresidente.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Comisionadovicepresidente.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Polly (Parrot) 17:16, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Elvinernestosantos.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Elvinernestosantos.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Polly (Parrot) 17:17, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Continued revert warring at Manuel Zelaya[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for Edit warring. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below.

With this edit, you continued your previous edit war. If this continues, you may be topic banned from all articles relating to Honduras. If you prefer the alternative of an indefinite block, that could be arranged. EdJohnston (talk) 03:59, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not dealing with this crap again. EdJohnson has already warned what'll happen if you try doing it again. Therequiembellishere (talk) 02:03, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And sign your posts, I don't like going into my history. Therequiembellishere (talk) 02:06, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm busy with a new project right now. Please stop leaving me your messages because they're of no consequence to me. Therequiembellishere (talk) 02:22, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm sure I've put the same impression up to other people before. The worst thing is that no matter what else we've done over our time on Wikipedia, those block will be on our records. If you come to Zelaya's talk and discuss the situation, we will most likely come to an agreement that satisfies our points of view and most likely the community. And I don't know anything about reggaeton; I focus on political templates and, when I feel I have adequate knowledge, the articles themselves. Therequiembellishere (talk) 05:51, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I don't. Almost everyone I know are within my realm. Therequiembellishere (talk) 06:00, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, you too. Therequiembellishere (talk) 06:10, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you did it again. Don't you think we're all tired of continually seeing those darn two pages in our watchlists? Please, stop it. Discussing it is fine (at least it's an interesting read), reverts without an end is not. --LjL (talk) 13:01, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Elvinsantos.jpg[edit]

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Elvinsantos.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 19:56, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]