User talk:Victoria Rothmans

Victoria Rothmans, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Victoria Rothmans! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Keelan (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Showbiz826 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Showbiz826. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:33, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Victoria Rothmans (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My editing previlages were revoked recently for a suspected sockpuppet of Showbiz826. However, I request a adminstraitor to review my block which is not right and neither evidences at sockpuppet imvestigation page were convincing enough. My IP adress is also very different from this blocked user, take a lot on other things too..,editing habits etc.

       Most of my edits were useful edits on several articles unlike this user who is regular caste promoter with unsourced/poorly sourced content...,Please take another look at it and do a check user against this unjustified block. Thanks. Victoria Rothmans (talk) 01:01, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The evidence in this case is compelling. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:08, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.