User talk:Vidontap

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A tag has been placed on South Asian Bar Association requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Kannie | talk 22:15, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

South Asian Bar Association[edit]

I guess the notability could be questionable. If you want, I can restore the article for you to work on it some more (although, you should place {{underconstruction}} at the top and no guarantees it won't be deleted by someone else).   jj137 22:43, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I restored it and added {{underconstruction}} in place of where the speedy tag was. Hope that helps.   jj137 23:13, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think it looks very good so far. Well referenced and well written overall. Nice job.   jj137 00:26, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:BASFlogo.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:BASFlogo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:20, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Bar Association of San Francisco, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.sfbar.org/about/index.aspx, http://www.sfbar.org/diversity/index.aspx, http://www.sfbar.org/diversity/pipeline_programs.aspx, http://www.sfbar.org/volunteer/index.aspx, and http://www.sfbar.org/foundation/index.aspx. As a copyright violation, Bar Association of San Francisco appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Bar Association of San Francisco has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. • Gene93k (talk) 02:08, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article South Asian Bar Association has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

An advertorially toned page on an unremarkable association. Significant RS coverage not found. Article is cited to the org itself. Created by Special:Contributions/Vidontap with no other contributions outside this topic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:41, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Bently reserve.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]