User talk:Vilian.vasilev95

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Vilian.vasilev95. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 10:49, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Hello, I'm Qed237. I noticed that you made a change to an article, First Professional Football League (Bulgaria), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 14:24, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at First Professional Football League (Bulgaria), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 23:25, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at First Professional Football League (Bulgaria). Qed237 (talk) 10:01, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please just tell me how can I send you a message or something, because you are annoying me man... EVERY SINGLE THING I HAD PUT IN THE PAGE OF FIRST PROFESSIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE (BULGARIA) WAS MADE BY HARD WORK FROM MANY PEOPLE. WE WANT TO PUT AS MUCH INFORMATION ABOUT PARVA LIGA AS MUCH WE CAN, AND EVERYTHING WE WRIGHT IN THE PAGE IS COMPLETELY TRUE - THE INTRODUCTION, THE HISTORY, THE COMPETITION FORMAT, ABOUT THE DERBIES, BROADCASTING RIGHTS, SPONSORSHIP RIGHTS AND SO ON... STOP BEING SO ANNOYING, PLEASE!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vilian.vasilev95 (talk • contribs)

Your best way to talk to me is either here or at my talkpage. No need to WP:SHOUT. Qed237 (talk) 10:43, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am happy to answer your questions and we should discuss before any content is readded again. Qed237 (talk) 10:51, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I was angry, because we didn't had problems in previous years with adding information to the page of the Parva Liga (former A Group). As I sad, because of the hard work of many people, we added and updated of course, the information about Bulgaria's premier football league, and all of it is real. We are using the official website of the Bulgarian Football Union as a source of information about everything - Competition format, History, Clubs, The Introduction of the page, other information like for The derbies, broadcasting rights, sponsorship rights and so on. So I really don't know what is the problem right now. With all of my respect to the people here like you, that are editing Wikipedia for years - so am I. We don't want information from the page of First Professional Football League (Bulgaria) to be deleted again.

As explained, all content has to be supported by reliable sources and the content removed has been tagged for over 6 months as unsourced so editors has had the chance to add sources. Qed237 (talk) 22:15, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(censored) Keep deleting, maybe it's nice for you to ruin someone's work... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vilian.vasilev95 (talk • contribs)

I added some sources, but I don't see the point in putting links that cite every single word on the article...--The TV Boy (talk · contribs) 23:27, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on content, not editors. Doing so is considered personal attack and may lead to longer blocks. Qed237 (talk) 23:58, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Препоръки

Колега, всичко хубаво, само те моля да спреш да слагаш "Parva Liga" тук в статиите, защото е граматически неправилно да се транскрибира така на английски. Трябва да е с директен превод - "First League". Също ти препоръчвам да използваш бутона за предварителен преглед "Show Preview" за да не правиш 1000 последователни редакции - така може да видиш кое какво си променил и да ги събереш промените в една редакция. Ще се опитам за последно да върна редакциите в страницата за Първа лига, защото патрульорите тук си знаят своето и се придържат стриткно към полиците, ако не стане - не стане, какво да се прави...--The TV Boy (talk · contribs) 23:02, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Здравей. Благодаря за препоръките. Разбрах за Parva Liga, просто си мислех, че е правилно, защото на някои други първенства (мисля че това на Словения) се използва... но както и да е, разбирам. Прав си и за това с многото промени. :D Предварителния преглед е много добро решение.

Истината е, че редактирам в Уикипедия от доста време, така като се замисля някъде от 2010-2011 година, но това ми е регистрацията от скоро, предната е DoubleV_80. Все още някои неща, въпреки това не са ми ясни, като това как точно да комуникирам с други потребители, като теб и за какво са тези User talk страници, или по-точно как да ги използвам.

Всичките материали в страницата на настоящата Първа лига, относно: History, Competition Format, The Derbies, Broadcasting rights, Sponsorship, UEFA Ranking + почти всичко в началото (това, което се води като увод или Introduction, не знам точно как) съм ги писал НАПЪЛНО И САМО АЗ, естествено в годините е прибавяна още информация от други, предполагам и ти също. Но се изнервям крайно много, след толкова много труд, превеждане, писане, разбиране и т.н. и т.н., а накрая някакъв п*дал да трие всичко (става на въпрос за мишлето qed). Как искам да го набарам този, как ми се и псува тук, ама трябва да съм културен все пак. Държи се като някоя женска в цикъл, ама аз му го и казах. Гледам на теб ти е правил същите забележки, ама НЯМА РАЗБИРАНЕ....... Все едно е някакъв "българомразец" и просто не иска тази страница да се развива - ама наистина така изглежда.

Всичко, което пиша е вярно и искам тази страница да е буквално перфектна откъм информация за първенството. Има ли някакъв начин да го заобиколим този? Преди не съм имал такъв проблем, всичко пишех и го добавях и нищо не се махаше.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Vilian.vasilev95 (talk • contribs) 22:41, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

За съжалиение в Уикипедия има т.нар. "маниаци", които имат само един тип редакции и никакви други освен тях, на едни манията им е махане на лога "без лиценз", на други е добавяне на шаблони, на трети е поправка на правописни грешки, а на някой е добавяне на шаблони "без източници". За съжаление статията стана обект на един такъв манияк - Eldumpo, от когото тръгна всичко. Като му върнах редакциите, той от своя страна е писал на администраторите и патрульорите, които не му мислят много, ама въобще, и без да прегледат за кое какво става въпрос почват като по учебник да трият, да предупреждават и да блокират. За съжаление тук всичко е стриктно "по учебник", или "по правилата" както те го наричат без да се съобразяват с отделните статии, което обаче много често без тази преценка направо ги осакатява. Моето предложение е да изчакаме към 2-3 седмици и да опитаме пак, като им мине музата и маниака спре да ги предупреждава. След известно време всичко отшумява, но трябва да мине малко преди да го направим пак, иначе пак ще го изтрият. Добре, че поне таблиците се пазят в историята на страницата.--The TV Boy (talk · contribs) 15:57, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:22, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced edits

Hi again. Wikipedia is built on content from WP:RS (reliable sources) and it is an encyclopedia based on facts. For that reasons we should not add unsourced content like you did in this edit (as well as removing a source). You have now done this a couple of times so please do not do this repeatedly as it may lead to a block, just like the one a few days ago (and probably longer). Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 21:10, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 22:49, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Vilian.vasilev95. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Vilian.vasilev95. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]