User talk:Vincentvikram/Archives/2021/January

On proposal

Modifying an original users comment isn't the best decision. If you would like to create a new ANI, or raise the issue there. Changing a users post isn't the best. If you would like to create a new report at ANI by all means go ahead.

However the proposal has nothing to do with this, in fact multiple users have told you to stop trying to state something on a user without solid diffs, and to stop stating things on users motives "votes" as you stated. Thanks. Des Vallee (talk) 06:57, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks! Have a great day :-) Vikram Vincent 07:47, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Des Vallee, You are way out of line. Stop. You are headed for your own ANI based on WP:BATTLEGROUND, if you survive the current ANI.   // Timothy :: talk  08:34, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

ANI Archives

Hello, Vincentvikram,

Please do not edit an archived talk page or noticeboard. If you feel that a case was archived prematurely, please unarchive the entire complaint and repost it on ANI. There is no reason to be adding new material to a closed case in the archives. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:23, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi Liz! I was trying to figure out how to do that :-) Thanks! Vikram Vincent 05:26, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

P Sainath

Please see the link here to the India Today article. Para 6. The reference was explained in another user's edit summary too. 115.96.29.204 (talk) 21:21, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Yes, I have. It is a duplicate entry. See my edit summary as well. Vikram Vincent 21:37, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

What do you mean by a duplicate entry? It is clearly referenced in Para 6, and the article is an original one. It is not a duplicate entry. 2405:204:2017:6A8F:C3A:4C6D:280:2198 (talk) 08:13, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

The content is already on the page. A repetition is being removed. Vikram Vincent 08:51, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

User talk:2409:4073:393:23EB:E576:279B:83F4:241B

The only block currently affecting that individual IP is a partial-block on the /34 range, which is a really big range; a full block on the range would cause a lot of "collateral damage" (i.e., prevent good-faith edits from many other users). We can easily block that individual IP, or a smaller range (like a /64 range) without touching the partial-block on /34. At this time, I'm only seeing 3 bad edits coming from the individual (and the corresponding /64 range). OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:31, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Feedback requests from the Feedback Request Service

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Al Capone on a "Social sciences and society" Good Article nomination, and at Talk:Aimery of Cyprus on a "History" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:12, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Substantiate your accusations or keep them to yourself please

Vincent, starting on 21 December you have posted demeaning and inaccurate information about me on ANI forums. You didn't provide any evidence to back them up. Please stop. I have offered to discuss your grievances several times but you've refused just as often. I can't keep anyone from liking or disliking me, but such feelings should not be the motivation for influencing ANI discussions and shopping for blocks. Thank you.Saflieni (talk) 23:28, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Saflieni There are enough diffs to substantiate your difficulties in being able to work with others and it has already been provided to you. It appears that you are unable to critically look at your own self destructive behaviour. I have no personal grievance with you. I called out your pattern of your behaviour as I saw it after a detailed analysis of your exchanges with others at multiple locations. It is possible that your problematic interactions could be more long standing than just on Wikipedia so it will be a good idea to talk to someone you trust in real life to get feedback. Just be careful not to attack them if/when people do provide you feedback cause that is another problematic tendency of yours. Remember if people stop providing you feedback, however hurt you feel, it means they no longer care and that is a very bad place to be. I would suggest yoga and meditation or maybe even a martial art to channel your chi. Best wishes. Vikram Vincent 04:14, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

I asked you to substantiate your accusations. Instead you post more accusations without substantiating them. Your first posts about me on 21 December were as condescending and insulting as what you write here. You've accused me of serious misconduct such as bullying without evidence, have dismissed factual information as "toxic" without an explanation, are shopping for admins to block me - right after I got a ban over a minor misunderstood content dispute - and then you have the audacity to post sarcastic remarks and advice about my chi? Who's attacking who? You refused then as you do now to engage in a normal, respectful dialogue. If that's your attitude, at least have the decency to refrain from posting more tendentious remarks and false accusations. Focus on your own behavior before (mis)judging others. Thank you. Saflieni (talk) 06:17, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Saflieni Please feel free to move WP:AN. I think this conversation on my talk page is done. Best! Vikram Vincent 07:03, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Please observe Wikipedia policy: WP:WIAPA - Accusations about personal behavior that lack evidence. Serious accusations require serious evidence, usually in the form of diffs and links. Saflieni (talk) 08:27, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Get off my talk page, Saflieni! Vikram Vincent 08:38, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:WP:Yes Marxism-Leninism

Draft:WP:Yes Marxism-Leninism, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:WP:Yes Marxism-Leninism and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:WP:Yes Marxism-Leninism during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Crossroads ^-talk- 08:36, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Mccapra (talk) 18:01, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Mccapra Noted. Contested.

Vikram Vincent 18:51, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

G10 declined for https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ishrath_Jahan