User talk:Vipinhari/Archive 2

The rightful heir to the Georgian throne

Hello Vipinhari, Please don’t be irritated, just understand that we, the Georgians, are at the stage of construction of the country and we try to bring the country back to the old, traditional legal base. On this way the Georgian people will encounter a lot of injustice and that is why we focus our attention at any detail relating to Georgian Royalty placed on your page.

The idea of restoration of monarchy is a most delicate issue and that is why on implementing this idea a great importance is attached to the legitimacy rule which is observed according to the international law. And legitimacy conditions observance of the rights of that one person (which is legitimate). In our case due to lack of information awareness of the Georgian society and in certain cases because of competent but unjustly partial persons there takes place violation of rights of those whom the royal throne belongs to by law. And we declare convincingly once again that the royal throne of Georgia by law belongs to His Royal Highness Prince Nugzar Bagration-Gruzinsky. This is confirmed by the memorandum carried out by the whole dynasty in 2006 in which once again there was recorded superiority of Prince Nugzar’s family in the royal ancestry. The only Prince Nugzar unites in himself the blood of the baptized kings of Western and Eastern Georgia. He is genetically an only legal heir of Kartli, Kakheti and Imereti Kingdoms. Also the last king of the united Kingdom of Georgia, Giorgi VIII, was only his immediate ancestor in the whole dynasty. That is why he is by right called HRH and Crown Prince.

As for David Mukhraneli, in spite of the fact that he married Prince Nugzar’s daughter, Princess Anna, per grade he remains a representative of the offshoot of the princes of Mukhrani. This offshoot was formed in the XVth century. His immediate ancestors never reigned in Georgia and that is why by law it is incorrect to call David Mukhraneli HRH. He like his ancestors over the centuries had the title of Prince and served the king and was called princes of Mukhrani.

When the Empire of Russia tragically abolished the throne in 1801, they exiled the royal family - HRH Prince Nugzar's ancestors. No one from the other lines (Bagrationi-Mukhranski,Bagrationi-Davitishvili, Bagrationi-Babadishi) were exiled to Russia, because everyone knew that they were high nobles and had no right or claim to the throne. For example, the Mukhranbatoni branch of offshoot princes of the high nobility lost all sovereignty when Konstantin II, King of Kartli's (1478-1505) older son King David X (1505-1525) took the throne instead of their ancestor, the younger son, Prince Bagrat Mukhranbatoni, who began the Bragrationi-Mukhranski branch of high nobles. No one of this cadet line has reigned over any kingdom since the time of King Konstantin II in 1505. They received recognition from Imperial Russia as " the Illustrious." Prince David Bagrationi-Mukhraneli is from this line of non-reigning princes.

It is important to remember, that the marriage between David, a Prince of the high nobility, and Anna, Princess of the royal blood, does not give David "de jure" sovereignty or make him a royal. Only HRH Prince Nugzar, the rightful heir, could make him a royal or give him any sovereign rights. If Prince Nugzar, the heir or "de jure" monarch and king of Georgia, passes away and the marriage between David and Anna is still intact, David would be head of the home, but not head of state. That would be Princess Anna's exclusive right as Prince Nugzar has designated her as his heir, and the more ancient history and traditions of ancient times provides for female succession when no male heir can be found, because succession is semi-salic.

Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Konstantine 001 (talk • contribs) 15:34, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Adriano Espaillat

Dear Vipinhari, The article Adriano Espaillat has been VANDALIZED and PAGE BLANKED several times over the past 24 hours. The version which you restored was PAGE BLANKED within a matter of minutes. Some protection for this page may be appropriate. Thank you, 69.203.119.66 (talk) 20:31, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Hey, please add your request in Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Vipin Hari || talk 02:54, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Vandalized article

I removed the post to Blackmagic2604's userpage since it was made by another user and it was vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Abby 98 (talk • contribs) 15:49, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Please use edit summary when you edit any article. See WP:FIES. I haven't seen any summary, so I couldn't differentiate between vandalism and good faith edit. Vipin Hari || talk 15:58, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Einstein on the Lake

Hello Vipinhari. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Einstein on the Lake, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Thank you. Olaf Davis (talk) 17:56, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi Olaf, while I was patrolling the page, the only content in the page was:

"Einstein on the Lake" is a novel, that it is written by German Physicist Ulrich Woelk. Bilgelerimiz doğabilimci olsaydı (talk) 17:00, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

See here. That was the reason why I went ahead and tagged for CSD, because IMHO it is a very short article that does not provide sufficient context to identify its subject. Vipin Hari || talk 19:03, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Declined Speedy Delete - Mark Curran

Hello, I am a Page Patroller and stumbled across this article. An elected sheriff is a fairly notable individual. However, this article may be self-written which would be a COI. --Morenooso (talk) 20:07, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks Morenooso for your explanation! Did you get time for tagging the article for COI? Vipin Hari || talk 03:47, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

CSD G4 (repost)

Hi there. I noticed that you tagged Mosezickle for speedy deletion under G4 as a repost of previously deleted material. When I looked at the log for the page, it appeared that the article had been previously speedied for A7, but had not been deleted via AfD. Per CSD G4, the criteria only applies to "a sufficiently identical and unimproved copy, having any title, of a page deleted via a deletion discussion". The key there is "via deletion discussion"... since no discussion takes place for speedy deletions, they don't apply for automatic re-deletion as a repost. Unless I'm missing an AfD somewhere by a different title, that criteria doesn't apply. I retagged the article using {{db-multiple}} as both G11 and A7. Cheers, Nick—^Contact/_Contribs 03:56, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

You're correct, Nick. Thanks for your explanation!

The reject

Although The reject does not seem to qualify for inclusion, it does not qualify as a blatant hoax, as it does, in fact, exist. I've removed the tag and prodded the article. NativeForeigner ^Talk/_Contribs 04:01, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Looks like its been speedied as A7... Nick—^Contact/_Contribs 04:04, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, not quite right either. Not a big deal though. Was going to retag as A10 as it recreates Jerkin' Thanks NativeForeigner ^Talk/_Contribs 04:09, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

ST. Michael Intituation

thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Simy2j (talk • contribs) 11:05, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

A friendly note on Carnivores (band)

I have removed the Speedy Deletion tag that you or someone else placed on Carnivores (band) and have sent the article to A deletion review. You can view the discussion on Carnivores (band) at this page. You are more than welcome to join the discussion if you wish. Cheers! Dusti^SPEAK!! 14:17, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Vladimir Stojilovic- Donix

I have removed your {{db-nonsense}} tag on Vladimir Stojilovic- Donix. Simply because an article is not written in English does not make it nonsense. This particular article was written in Croatian, and was easily translated by Google translate. The fact that the article is about a non-notable band has been noted. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:00, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Please see CSD G1. Patent nonsense. - Pages consisting entirely of incoherent text or gibberish with no meaningful content or history. This excludes poor writing, partisan screeds, obscene remarks, implausible theories, vandalism and hoaxes, fictional material, coherent non-English material, and poorly translated material. {{db-g1}}, {{db-nonsense}} Vipin Hari || talk 17:07, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Yes, coherent non-English material is excluded from WP:CSD#G1. This means that articles that are coherently written in a foreign language are not eligible for speedy deletion simply because of their foreign language. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:26, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you so much WikiDan for the explanation, but I've seen that article is now deleted by the criteria {{db-a7}}. Vipin Hari || talk 11:11, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Ps0114

i was hust wondering can i make a new page for someone without being told that it will be deleted soon thanks ps0114 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ps0114 (talk • contribs) 16:32, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Hannah Kight

Why did you remove the CSD and tag? It makes no assertion of significance. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 20:27, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi Dlohcierekim, I've removed CSD and used PROD for deletion, since author has contested CSD-A7 with a lame excuse. The subject is non-notable and the article is a written in an autobiography tone with COI, I thought that it has to be deleted anyway! Vipin Hari || talk 03:26, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

drive by at freedom

Hi, I just noticed this edit? Can you tell me why you think the page is well served by it? Some of what I'm thinking of is MOS:DAB, but also, just think about the page before and after the edit. 0¹⁸ (talk) 04:27, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Let us take an example of [[Freedom of will]], I've changed it to [[Free will|Freedom of will]]. So essentially, someone who reads the page cannot see any difference, but IMHO servers can feel it. We are reducing a redirection through [[Freedom of will]]. Vipin Hari || talk 06:28, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

I think this is a reasonable question for asking at the talk page for the MOS. the novel is a redirect with possibilities, so I would not have "fixed" that one. The hockey team never mentions freedom on the page, I'd say ax it. 0¹⁸ (talk) 14:34, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

I looked at it again and realized that there is no reason to pipe. It was just fine as is. 0¹⁸ (talk) 16:12, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

If I'm incorrect in those edits, please go ahead and fix. Vipin Hari || talk 16:20, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

I guess, I brought it up with you because it looks like you are using a tool that makes articles worse. Checkout this edit. What do you think of that page? Why would you make the Brazil Brasil change? I think that when you use a tool to make edits you should be really really sure that you are helping articles, and I'm not sure this is the case in this instance. 0¹⁸ (talk) 21:08, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for bringing this up! Vipin Hari || talk 05:12, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Chinese Overseas Movement of Advanced Culture

Hi Vipinhari,

I'm not sure if this is the right page to talk with you. I have a few questions regarding my page Chinese Overseas Movment of Advanced Culture.

This page was originally set up in 2007, and there were some issues mentioned at this time i do not believe the Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China had a page. what I am asking is How can they come after us and claim COMAC (disambiguation) and have my page deleted?

Can you please explain this or am I totally wrong, if I am I apologise but it doesn't seem right to me. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COMAC_%28disambiguation%29

Regards EGA —Preceding unsigned comment added by Critical1 (talk • contribs) 14:14, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

I've seen that an article by this name is deleted 3 times. Please contact respective administrators directly. Vipin Hari || talk 00:00, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

• 20:42, 19 March 2010 User:WilyD deleted "Chinese Overseas Movement of Advanced Culture" ‎ (G2: Test page - I think. Maybe G1 or A1?)
• 02:56, 10 April 2009 User:KillerChihuahua deleted "Chinese Overseas Movement of Advanced Culture" ‎ (A7: Article about an eligible subject, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject)
• 03:01, 21 April 2007 User:Xoloz deleted "Chinese Overseas Movement of Advanced Culture" ‎ (Prod complete)

Peregrine Semiconductor

You added an "unreferenced" tag to my new page for Peregrine Semiconductor. I believe all of the substantive information in this new page comes from the Silicon on Sapphire page in Wikipedia. I have since added a reference to a published scientific paper in IEEE Electron Devices that should address your concern. I have also added a reference to the management changes at the company. The "uncategorized" tag that you added has since been removed by SoxBot because I did add a category reference. Is there anything else that you feel is not properly referenced? Gaiamei (talk) 19:31, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello, Gaiamei, now the article seems to be referenced. Be bold and remove {{unreferenced}} tag. But, please read Notability guideline for an organization. If it's not notable, anybody may tag it for deletion, citing non-notability. Cheers Vipin Hari || talk 04:14, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

References in Sujith Kumar.B.S

You added four references to Sujith Kumar.B.S, but not one of them actually verified the fact in question in the article. Can you provide better references? WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 19:48, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

These are the only 4 sites which provide any references to Sujith Kumar.B.S in GNews old. So I thought of adding those to the article. But now, IMO the subject is not notable enough to qualify for a separate article. Can it be tagged for {{db-person}} or wait for {{prod blp}} to expire? Cheers, Vipin Hari || talk 03:00, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Copyedit Backlog Elimination Drive

Hi, as a member of the Guild of Copy Editors you're hereby notified of and invited to participate in the WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Backlog elimination drives/May 2010. Please help us eliminate the 8,000+ copyedit backlog! Participating editors will receive barnstars and other awards, according to their level of participation. ɳorɑfʈ ^Talk! 00:14, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Sym-Tech

Hi Vipinhari,

I work for Sym-Tech and noticed you placed a message which points to our content being the same as on Wellington Motors, who market our product! They do not own the copyrights to our name, but do have a right to resell our products to the end consumer.

I'm very new to the Wiki page idea... and any advice is welcome.

I wasn't sure where exactly to put the {{hangon}} tag, but have done so on the page in any case.

Thanks

Shirley Hooker
[personal data removed]

Hi Shirley, when a tag is placed on the page saying that the article may meet Wikipedia’s criteria for speedy deletion, you may add {{hangon}} below that tag, if you disagree with the deletion proposal. Then explain on its talk page why the article should not be deleted. This will alert sysops to give you time to give valid reasons. See Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion for more information. But, I've noticed that the article in question is now deleted with the comment: Kinu (talk | contribs) deleted "Sym-Tech" ‎ (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion: Also G12). Hope this helps, Vipin Hari || talk 03:12, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Instituto de Estudos Superiores Isidoro da Graça

Hello, Vipinhari. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Instituto de Estudos Superiores Isidoro da Graça, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to schools, and higher education institutes are usually considered notable. JohnCD (talk) 14:09, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Engineering Council of India

Dear Vipinhari, Just started one article Engineering council of India, If possible, plz make it better looking...regards..--Shrieekk (talk) 18:29, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Hey Shrieekk, definitely I'll be helping you. Cheers, Vipinhari || talk 18:44, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Don't forget to mark your entries from the Requests page

On behalf of the coordinator of the WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors Backlog elimination drive for May 2010, ɳorɑfʈ Talk!, I would like to thank you for your active participation in the Drive. I am writing to inform you that we have introduced additional Guild of Copy Editors' Gold Star Awards for the drive. To qualify, you will need to add an asterisk to all the full copyedits you have completed from the Requests page. More information can be found in the awards section of the Drive. If you have any questions, please post them to the Drive's talk page. Once again, thank you for participating, and we look forward to a meaningful drop in the numbers due to your hard work and efforts. - S Masters (talk) 03:50, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Come copyedit if you're still interested!

Hello, I noticed that you signed up for Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Backlog elimination drives/May 2010, but you haven't contributed yet. I want you to know that I'm available to you if you have any questions or needs. We'd still love to have you if you're interested. ɳorɑfʈ ^Talk! 20:44, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, but due to some real life commitments, opting out of the drive. Cheers, Vipinhari || talk 13:01, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

64.178.101.67

sorry for my behavior i just have strong opinions against the cavaliers, knicks, and nuggets. i need help on maintaining neutral point of view. thank you.

- indian —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.178.101.67 (talk) 18:15, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Talk:What They Died For

I have started a discussion at Talk:What They Died For. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.111.47.43 (talk) 14:57, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

I've replied there. Cheers, Vipinhari || talk 16:51, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Delection of Cidician

I have wiped the page clean as requested, please delete it now.

Thank you for your time Hongdx (talk) 02:58, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Endhiran and Joseph Vijay

Most of my edits to these (or any) articles are reverting small vandalism, adding a bit of info, and editing simple mistakes which I don't necessarily think requires a whole edit summary. If I make any major changes then I usually do have an edit summary. Thank you for your reminders but I think I already know how things work here. Eelam StyleZ (talk) 14:29, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Happy to know that you already know how things work here. But when you find time, please read WP:FIES. To summarize it, 'Always provide an edit summary'! Cheers, Vipinhari || talk 17:25, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Agreed. Thanks! Eelam StyleZ (talk) 18:20, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs A Dating Story Secret Agent X Munna (actor) Karunas 28 (book) Dead Gentlemen Productions Elliott Arnold Aval Varuvala Wolverine and Deadpool The Postmodern Mariner Amaravathi (film) Flare (magazine) Scratch (magazine) Awakening Records The Sword of Conan Arya (actor) Tina Kim Super Don Quix-ote The Purple Pterodactyls

Cleanup Kevin S. Collier Heathcliff (comic strip) Deadworld Merge Nose-picking Korean War Dragonfly Add Sources Disney Comics Sivaji Ganesan Randy Cassingham Wikify A Deal in Ostriches Ma Weiqi Patrick Macnee's Ghost Stories Expand List of Cowboy Bebop chapters Nonverbal learning disorder WNKU

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:58, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks...

For keeping an eye on my talk page; don't get me wrong, but I hope I'll never have to reciprocate. ;) Salvio ( ^{Let's talk 'bout it!}) 16:52, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome! :-) Vipinhari || talk 16:56, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Nick Fowler

Hi. I'm Nick Fowler and I'm upset that my entry might be deleted. I recently added a few sources to my entry because there was a note that sources were lacking, and I am wondering if perhaps these sources violate copyright law. I noticed that you felt also that I lacked google hits, and I was told otherwise, that my band Maximilian is King has been getting many google hits.

Thanks so much for your time. I would very much like to keep my page up as it is helping my career consdiderably

Sincerely,

Nick Fowler —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.65.67.99 (talk) 05:15, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Please post your comments at this article's entry on the Articles for deletion/Nick Russell Fowler page, so that others can also view them. Also, please read the Wikipedia guideline on Autobiography. It says that "Avoid writing or editing an article about yourself, other than to correct unambiguous errors of fact." Please read the policy about Notability (people) also. If you need more help, go to Wikipedia:Questions, or ask your question on your talk page and place {{helpme}} before the question. Cheers, Vipinhari || talk 02:13, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Nick Fowler

{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Russell Fowler}}

I am a fan of Nick Fowler's fiction- A Thing or Two About Curtis and Camilla is one of my favorite books, and was in fact recognized as a best new fiction offering. I was curious and dismayed to find his article considered for deletion- when I was showing my sister that page I found it so flagged. Just wonder why? He is a cultural resource to know about, and we are richer for artists-- especially writers- I am biased I guess as a teacher of writing! (Bluedillygal (talk) 13:36, 1 June 2010 (UTC))

Please post your comments at this article's entry on the Articles for deletion/Nick Russell Fowler page, so that others can also view them. Please read the policy about Notability (people) also. Cheers, Vipinhari || talk 02:03, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Nick Russell Fowler

[[1]]

In regard to the assertion that Nick Fowler is a non-notable person I must submit a grievance on his behalf, as he is a published writer and an extremely talented and seasoned musician and actor. I feel he has every right to keep his entry here and would be appalled if it were deleted. Please allow time for his entry to be brought up to the standards set by the website. Any assistance you could provide to that affect would be greatly appreciated. Thank You. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Talamasca67 (talk • contribs) 15:54, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Please post your comments at this article's entry on the Articles for deletion/Nick Russell Fowler page, so that others can also view them. Please read the policy about Notability (people) also. Cheers, Vipinhari || talk 02:05, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Nick Fowler

hello Vipinhari. I'm writing to request that you rescind your rollback of Nick Fowler's page where you state he's a non-notable person. His accomplishments make him notable and I would like his page to continue. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mstachenfeld (talk • contribs) 16:52, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Please post your comments at this article's entry on the Articles for deletion/Nick Russell Fowler page, so that others can also view them. Please read the policy about Notability (people) also. Cheers, Vipinhari || talk 02:05, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Nick Russel Fowler

I agree this is the same Nick Russel Fowler that wrote the very popular novel "A Thing or Two about Curtis and Camillia" Nick is a personal friend of mine since 1990, a former band mate and "brother" for life, I think he deserves to keep his Wikipedia page with all the creative credits he has earned. I don't get what is in question here. I am very impressed with his extensive work and he deserves the right to add to the page as he make his accomplishments. He works so hard for everything he has and is a very self-motivated person. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael haar (talk • contribs) 03:00, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Please post your comments at this article's entry on the Articles for deletion/Nick Russell Fowler page, so that others can also view them. Please read the policy about Notability (people) also. Cheers, Vipinhari || talk 02:05, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Nick Fowler

Hello Sir,

I realized why you thought I don't have a lot of google searches; because people google Nick Fowler, not Nick Russell Fowler. The Russell is preventing people who google search me to find me. Is there any way that I can change the name of my wikipedia entry to Nick Fowler?

It would mean a lot to me, and then you would see that I am in fact a notable person.

Also, as I do not know how to navigate this, can you please respond to my email address, which is relwofkcin@gmail.com.

Thanks so much!

Nick —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.165.95.64 (talk) 01:02, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Please post your comments at this article's entry on the Articles for deletion/Nick Russell Fowler page, so that others can also view them. Also, please read the Wikipedia guideline on Autobiography. It says that "Avoid writing or editing an article about yourself, other than to correct unambiguous errors of fact." Please read the policy about Notability (people) also. If you need more help, go to Wikipedia:Questions, or ask your question on your talk page and place {{helpme}} before the question. Cheers, Vipinhari || talk 02:10, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you!

Vipinhari - Thank for your participation and support in my RfA.

I can honestly say that your comments and your trust in me are greatly appreciated.

Please let me know if you ever have any suggestions for me as an editor, or comments based on my admin actions.

Thank you!  7  23:09, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome. Congratulations on your successful RfA. Cheers, Vipinhari || talk 05:57, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Maj Cameron

Just thought I'd let you know that I updated your prod BLP on this page to reflect the date it had when I put one on it earlier. Someone removed it without addressing the issues. Cheers! --Auntof6 (talk) 11:19, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Yes, I've seen your BLP PROD on June 1. User:86.178.158.51 has removed it without improving the article. Cheers, Vipinhari || talk 11:24, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Grab some glory, and a barnstar

Hi, I'd like to invite you to participate in the Guild of Copy Editors July 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive. In May, about 30 editors helped remove the {{copyedit}} tag from 1175 articles. The backlog is still over 7500 articles, and extends back to the beginning of 2008! We really need your help to reduce it. Copyediting just a couple articles can qualify you for a barnstar. Serious copyeditors can win prestigious and exclusive rewards. See the event page for more information. And thanks for your consideration. ɳorɑfʈ ^Talk! 15:40, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank spam!

Hello, Vipinhari. You have new messages at User:TFOWR/Thankspam.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

TFOWR 21:11, 11 June 2010 (UTC)