Jump to content

User talk:Virginia1127

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

AfC notification: Draft:Dovid Schick has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Dovid Schick. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 01:36, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr. Sabrina Kemeny (June 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Chetsford (talk) 06:18, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Tapwithus! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chetsford (talk) 06:18, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dovid Schick (June 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Legacypac (talk) 21:30, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr. Sabrina Kemeny (July 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 03:39, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dovid Schick

[edit]

Hello, Tapwithus. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dovid Schick".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 21:23, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tapwithus. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Dr. Sabrina Kemeny.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89(T·C) 04:50, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tap Systems, Inc. has been accepted

[edit]
Tap Systems, Inc., which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

 I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 20:22, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

[edit]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Virginia1127 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #24018 was submitted on Feb 20, 2019 22:50:04. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 22:50, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Virginia1127 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hired a PR company to do a wiki page for us in Nov 2018. Page was deleted in January 2019 due to the original submission coming from a banned user. I sat on chat for 2 hours finding out why, then changed my username at their request. I also disclosed my COI. Once all of this was done I copied and pasted our original page back on wikipedia. Now it says I am a sock puppet which I dont even know what that means.

Decline reason:

questions not answered within a reasonable time frame.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 14:13, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Clarify this for me ,please. Are you saying that you copied and pasted the article, under your own name, and then submitted it to Wikipedia? If so, whether you did it under your original name or a changed name, it remains sockpuppetry. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 14:35, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Who is all this "we" and "us"? Accounts should belong to only one person. Legacypac (talk) 19:07, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely true. When you answer my question, please answer this one as well. Be aware that you will not be unblocked unless you give adequate answers to both questions.