User talk:Vivbaker

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please don't add copyrighted text to Wikipedia[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your creation of the article, David Rocastle Trust, but we cannot accept copyrighted text borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Please see Wikipedia:Copyright problems for more information on this topic, or generally, Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines. Please do not remove the copyright violation notice placed in the article or repost the suspected infringing text. However, if you would like to rewrite the article in your own words, follow the link in the posted notice to create a temporary subpage. If your new article is appropriate, and not a further copyright violation, the reviewing administrator will move that new article into place once the copyright status of the original has been resolved. Happy editing! Qwghlm 10:15, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies hope my resubmitted text is better --Vivbaker 17:57, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it's fine. Thanks. Qwghlm 20:04, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lawrie McMenemy‎[edit]

Good work reorganising the Lawrie Lawrie McMenemy page --Bedders 08:10, 12 July 2006 (UTC)‎[reply]

Interwiki[edit]

Hi, I noticed by chance that on your edit (details) to Fredrik Ljungberg that you had slightly modified the link to the Chinese (zh) version, causing it to link to a non-existant page. So I checked a couple of your contribs and found for Johan Djourou your edit (details) removed the Polish link. I'm not accusing you of doing it on purpose, but needless to say, it would be good if it doesn't happen in future. Thanks.  SLUMGUM  yap  stalk   04:21, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keith Edelman[edit]

Is this article entirely your own work? From the tone of the piece and the lack of wikilinks it looks like you've copy and pasted the article from somewhere, although I can't find anywhere for sure. If you have copy & pasted it, please say so - copyright violations are not allowed on Wikipedia. Even if you've changed a few words from the original, that will not do - the article needs to be original and written from scratch. Qwghlm 10:07, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote it using three pieces I found through Google including a quite thorough CV for Mr Edelman as a source.--Vivbaker 20:56, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK cheers, just with the lack of wiklinks and the large paragraphs it looked like a copyvio. As for other directors, definitely Ken Friar (he's been with the club since the Second World War) not sure about the Carrs, I barely know anything about them myself. Qwghlm 10:37, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dein cleanup[edit]

I've cleaned up David Dein a fair bit, trying to make it NPOV and well-sourced - your comments would be welcome. Thanks. Qwghlm 21:51, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Spannish location articles[edit]

Hi, if possible, can you please add the Spannish stub to each article in order people are aware of its existence and can help you expand the articles. You can do this by adding {{spain-stub}} to each article at the very bottom of the page. AA Milne 11:29, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hispanic March[edit]

Hi! Got your note. Do you have the energy to edit the texts together? --Wetman 20:19, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Counties of Marca Hispanica.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Counties of Marca Hispanica.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:17, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Counties of Marca Hispania II.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Counties of Marca Hispania II.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:06, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Hispanic March[edit]

Your recent edit to Hispanic March (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 08:24, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hill-Wood/Keswick[edit]

I just didn't think it was really that relevant - it also vaguely implies somehting untoward about Keswick's appointment to the Arsenal board. But that's just my interpreatation, if you think it's reasonable and want to put it back in again then I won't argue, I'm not too bothered about it. Qwghlm 22:00, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense Images[edit]

Drawing your own images isn't appropriate for an encyclopedia. Taking a picture (or find one) and then uploading it to commons (releasing it under GDFL) would have been a much better way to go. As for removing text, when I see such an image added to an article, it is appropriate to think the related text will also be vandalism. I'm sorry if the text was removed wrongfully. --MECU≈talk 17:47, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:N340.GIF[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:N340.GIF. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:42, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:RN9 at Millau.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:RN9 at Millau.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:10, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:A9 Route Map.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:A9 Route Map.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:04, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A21 autoroute[edit]

I have announced your article at Wikipedia:WikiProject France/New article announcements. If you write more about France-related topics, please announce your articles there. Thank you, and happy editing, STTW (talk) 22:28, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

baronets and notability[edit]

Viv, I don't think Baronets aren't automatically notable.

1st bts are because they must have been created a baronet for doing something. Second bts onwards need to demonstrate notability. They don't inherit a place in Lords like proper barons do and the political and representative power that (theoretically at least) goes with the title, it's just a title.

I suggest, if you cannot find that a baronet is indepedently notable, then merge into one article on the baronetcy or the family. Paul Silverman 13:44, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Latest Arsenal edits[edit]

Thanks for letting me know - your addiiton was pretty sound, though I tweaked it a bit to make the follow-on a bit smoother, as well as wikifying it a bit more. Qwghlm 23:01, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nina Bracewell-Smith[edit]

Please do not remove sourced information from Wikipedia... and particularly not without explaining your rationale. --Dweller 11:30, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Marca Hispanica[edit]

I have written a criticism of that map in the corresponding Talk Page. You are probably insterested in reading and discussing it. --Sugaar 19:33, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't read yet the text but defintively Pamplona nor that fictitious entity of Sanguesa were never administratives domains of the Frankish Kingdom. If Pamplona was treated in any by the Franks, it was as part of the Duchy of Vasconia, to which they claimed domain. Pamplona only appears as political entity c. 832 (third Battle of Roncevaux Pass) when it splits from Vasconia with the help of the Banu Qasi, when the Duchy was temporarily under Frankish control. Nothing to do with the Spanish Mark at all. --Sugaar 12:59, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your uploaded credit report[edit]

I have deleted this material as it could be in copyright violation and is also primary material that is not directly referred to by a secondary source. Crum375 12:57, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Obtaining a credit report counts as primary information at best, and usually cannot be used in Wikipedia per copyvio limitations. This also includes Talk pages. Crum375 13:14, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Wolseley[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The Wolseley, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.thewolseley.com/History.aspx. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:59, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category Restaurants in Denmark[edit]

Hey, you seem to have accidentally created a category in the article space: Category Restaurants in Denmark. Note the space where the colon should be. I tried to move it to the correct name, Category:Restaurants in Denmark, but I'm not allowed to apparently. Anyway, could you create the category in the right place and tag the incorrect one with {{db-author}}? T'would be much appreciated, thanks. --Closedmouth (talk) 14:55, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Uh... never mind. --Closedmouth (talk) 15:43, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Jerome Anderson (Businessman)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Jerome Anderson (Businessman) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.  Chzz  ►  08:04, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Route Nationale 1.GIF and others[edit]

Hello, Vivbaker! You have uploaded some GIFs before more than 18 months. Now they're orphaned. Could you please tell me which article they ware on?--OsamaK 14:26, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

French autoroute A9: La Catalane?[edit]

I left a question that may be of interest to you at File talk:Autoroute A9.GIF. In any event, thanks for submitting those images. - PhilipR (talk) 08:37, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Vivbaker! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 938 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Roger Gibbs - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:44, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Autopista AP-41[edit]

The article Autopista AP-41 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced for nearly 4 years, fails WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stifle (talk) 11:31, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Route nationale 7.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Route nationale 7.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:40, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Route Nationale 2.GIF listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Route Nationale 2.GIF, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:40, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Route Nationale 3.GIF listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Route Nationale 3.GIF, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:41, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Route Nationale 5.GIF listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Route Nationale 5.GIF, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:41, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:A31 (France) Route marker.gif listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:A31 (France) Route marker.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. The Haz talk 04:39, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:A9 (France) Route marker.gif listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:A9 (France) Route marker.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. The Haz talk 04:39, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:A11 (France) Route marker.gif listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:A11 (France) Route marker.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. The Haz talk 04:39, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:A19 (France) Route marker.gif listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:A19 (France) Route marker.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. The Haz talk 04:40, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:A20 (France) Route marker.gif listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:A20 (France) Route marker.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. The Haz talk 04:40, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:A21 (France) Route marker.gif listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:A21 (France) Route marker.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. The Haz talk 04:40, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:A27 (France) Route marker.gif listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:A27 (France) Route marker.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 22:51, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:A29 (France) Route marker.gif listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:A29 (France) Route marker.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 22:55, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:A5 (France) Route marker.gif listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:A5 (France) Route marker.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 22:57, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:A43 (France) Route marker.gif listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:A43 (France) Route marker.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 22:59, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:A7 (France) Route marker.gif listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:A7 (France) Route marker.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 23:00, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:A26 (France) Route marker.gif listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:A26 (France) Route marker.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 19:27, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:A75 (France) Route marker.gif listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:A75 (France) Route marker.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 20:01, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:A6 (France) Route marker.gif listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:A6 (France) Route marker.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 20:03, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:A66 (France) Route marker.gif listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:A66 (France) Route marker.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 18:36, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:A68 (France) Route marker.gif listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:A68 (France) Route marker.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 18:40, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:A44 (France) Route marker.gif listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:A44 (France) Route marker.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 18:51, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Camí de Ronda[edit]

The article Camí de Ronda has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references and no indication of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robkirwan (talk) 14:50, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:A38 (France) Route marker.gif listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:A38 (France) Route marker.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 14:31, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:A39 (France) Route marker.gif listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:A39 (France) Route marker.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 14:31, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of David Rocastle Trust[edit]

The article David Rocastle Trust has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails to establish WP:Notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mais oui! (talk) 07:51, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:A48 (France) Route marker.gif listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:A48 (France) Route marker.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:49, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:A41 (France) Route marker.gif listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:A41 (France) Route marker.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:51, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:A42 (France) Route marker.gif listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:A42 (France) Route marker.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:52, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:A430 (France) Route marker.gif listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:A430 (France) Route marker.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:54, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:A404 (France) Route marker.gif listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:A404 (France) Route marker.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:56, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:A49 (France) Route marker.gif listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:A49 (France) Route marker.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:58, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:A45 (France) Route marker.gif listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:A45 (France) Route marker.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:25, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:A45 (France) Route marker.gif missing description details[edit]

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:05, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation[edit]

Your upload of File:A66a (France) Route marker.gif or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:14, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Le Calandre[edit]

The article Le Calandre has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:33, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gambero Rosso (restaurant)[edit]

The article Gambero Rosso (restaurant) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:20, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vendome (restaurant)[edit]

The article Vendome (restaurant) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:45, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Le Calandre for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Le Calandre is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Le Calandre until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:22, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vendome (restaurant) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vendome (restaurant) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vendome (restaurant) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:53, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Autovía A-34[edit]

Notice

The article Autovía A-34 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication this exists. Unsourced for 12 years and no mention of the road in N-340.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Anarchyte (talk | work) 13:35, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Autovía A-56[edit]

Notice

The article Autovía A-56 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not prove notability. Still proposed (https://www.laregion.es/articulo/ourense/paso-76-ribeira-sacra-dinamita-consenso-autovia/20181219072402843143.html) and unsourced for years. WP:ROADOUTCOMES.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Anarchyte (talk | work) 12:29, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Autovía A-72[edit]

Notice

The article Autovía A-72 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, non existent highway. Fails WP:TOOSOON and has been unreferenced since November 2006.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Koridas 📣 00:43, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Autovía A-74[edit]

Notice

The article Autovía A-74 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable road.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Koridas 📣 02:19, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Autovía A-76[edit]

Notice

The article Autovía A-76 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced article since November 2006 and subject shows no signs of notability. The Spanish Wiki only has passing mentions.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Koridas 📣 23:27, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Autovía C-14[edit]

Notice

The article Autovía C-14 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced article since November 2006 and subject shows no signs of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Koridas 📣 23:27, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Autovía C-65[edit]

Notice

The article Autovía C-65 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced article since November 2006 and subject shows no signs of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Koridas 📣 23:27, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Route nationale 18[edit]

Notice

The article Route nationale 18 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable road failing WP:NBUILD.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheSandDoctor Talk 09:30, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Route nationale 28[edit]

Notice

The article Route nationale 28 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable road failing WP:NBUILD.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheSandDoctor Talk 09:33, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Route nationale 27[edit]

Notice

The article Route nationale 27 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable road failing WP:NBUILD.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheSandDoctor Talk 09:34, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Route nationale 26[edit]

Notice

The article Route nationale 26 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable road failing WP:NBUILD.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheSandDoctor Talk 09:34, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Route nationale 25[edit]

Notice

The article Route nationale 25 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable road failing WP:NBUILD.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheSandDoctor Talk 09:34, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Autovia C-13 for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Autovia C-13 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autovia C-13 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 TT me 00:59, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Autovía A-47[edit]

Notice

The article Autovía A-47 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This doesn't appear to meet WP:N

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 18:50, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cracco Peck[edit]

Notice

The article Cracco Peck has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced since 24 April 2007

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Vivbaker&oldid=1216316909"