User talk:VonEisenMark

Seeking guidance on a next steps for Page Draft detailing an individual. I had started a talk page on a previous account (that I cannot seem to recover, username I believe to be Markvoneisen) about this subject, which has prompted a thorough vetting of the content contained in the new draft. This individual had a previous page that was taken down for using language deemed promotional in nature and citing sources that were not verifiable, third party references (before I began work on it). Noting this, my draft is emphatic in its objective, third party sources. Also important: I am aware of a conflict of interest in that I am personally enrolled in a program that this individual's nonprofit runs, and had been given previous talk page advice to seek a wiki reader to vet the drafted content so that what gets approved will not be deleted again. 1) My draft is currently offline — what is the best forum to enter this content into wikipedia so that I can properly format it (all the pieces/internal & external links are ready)? 2) Who or what body should I initially seek to vet the information? Any and all comments welcome here. Always appreciate the analytical insight you all provide. Thanks. VonEisenMark (talk) 19:24, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, VonEisenMark. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 14:29, 16 July 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi VonEisenMark! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Seeking guidance on a next steps for Page Draft., has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome VonEisenMark!

Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 48,256,220 registered editors!

Hello, VonEisenMark. Welcome to Wikipedia!

I'm S0091, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

To help get you started, you may find these useful:

The Five Pillars (fundamental principles) of Wikipedia

A Primer for Newcomers

Introduction to Wikipedia

Wikipedia Training Modules

Simplified Manual of Style

Creating a new article via the Article Wizard

When editing, follow the 3 Core Content Policies:

1. Neutral point of view: represent significant views fairly

2. Verifiability: claims should cite reliable, published sources

3. No original research: no originality; reference published sources

Brochures: Editing Wikipedia & Illustrating Wikipedia
Ask a Question about How to Use Wikipedia
Help

Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.

Sincerely, S0091 (talk) 17:08, 20 July 2020 (UTC) (Leave me a message)[reply]

Awards

cut all the minor awards David notMD (talk) 02:19, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks User:David notMD for all of your assistance here. I really appreciate the advice. Awards have been condensed, external links removed, apart from one. One question is how to remove the external link for Research!America before ==Education==. Not sure how to edit that source text at all. Another question: would it be inappropriate to include selected publications? I want to underscore that I'm not going for promotional value of any sort, but this question was asked and I thought it may appear promotional to reviewers. Appreciate the insight. VonEisenMark (talk) 13:33, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To edit content in the Lead, click on Edit in the top bar menu (this allows you to edit the entire article). I went ahead and removed the hyperlink. David notMD (talk) 14:22, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you David notMD. My next order of business is photo upload. It seems that the photo must be my own? I was given her most widely used professional headshot but 1) am not sure that I should upload it, as I did not "take" the picture and 2) am not confident how to do it correctly. Wait on this? Act on this? VonEisenMark (talk) 13:29, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PHOTO: Best if you have a photo you took yourself, or else identify a photo and the photographer willing to donate it, meaning that giving up all copyright and ownership. And that is directly, not telling you it is OK to use the photo. Keep in mind that a professional headshot probably copyright protected by the photographer, not the subject. Also, obviously, downloading photos from internet. David notMD (talk) 15:29, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:File Upload Wizard for process. David notMD (talk) 15:32, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi VonEisenMark! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Follow-up to Seeking guidance on a next steps for Page Draft., has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi VonEisenMark! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Seeking reviews on pre-submission page draft., has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mary McEnerney Woolley (December 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Missvain was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Unfortunately, we are unable to accept this submission due to its lack of notability and/or sourcing. Feel free to resubmit once you fully source the article using sources about the subject such as:

Magazine articles
Newspaper articles
Television interviews
Books or publications, from reputable publishers, about the subject

Note, the articles should feature the subject extensively - not just passing mentions. Also, blogs cannot be used.

If that is not possible, then it may be too soon for your subject to have their own article. However, I encourage you to edit other areas of Wikipedia - there are countless articles that can use improvement.

Thank you again for your contributions!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mary McEnerney Woolley and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mary McEnerney Woolley, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Missvain (talk) 00:15, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, VonEisenMark! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Missvain (talk) 00:15, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mary McEnerney Woolley

Hello, VonEisenMark. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mary McEnerney Woolley, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mary McEnerney Woolley

Hello, VonEisenMark. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mary McEnerney Woolley".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:20, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]