User talk:Vpmarcom

February 2017

Hello, I'm FuriouslySerene. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Value Partners (asset management) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. FuriouslySerene (talk) 00:36, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Value Partners (asset management), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Please stop removing reliably sourced content. Please also do not edit the language of the article to introduce syntax and other grammar errors. FuriouslySerene (talk) 01:45, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Vpmarcom. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Value Partners (asset management), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. FuriouslySerene (talk) 01:46, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Value Partners

There's nothing wrong with adding content and sources. One of the bigger problems with your edits is that you removed sourced content, without a valid reason. For example, this edit removed the sentence "In 2015, the firm sold its 49 percent stake in Golden Capital Fund Management, a joint venture in China" which was sourced to South China Morning Post. Wikipedia includes content from reliable sources, even if that information can be perceived to be negative. Furthermore, please read our policies on conflicts of interest. Based on your username and edits, it appears you have a conflict of interest. If so, you should avoid editing the page, and instead suggest changes on the talk page of the article. FuriouslySerene (talk) 01:20, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]