Jump to content

User talk:WOOKIEwantMEDAL

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello WOOKIEwantMEDAL, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 

chocolateboy 01:35, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Post Adolescent Narcissism[edit]

Thanks for your edits. I restored the link to PAN in the narcissism article because the See Also section there contains links to every topic related to narcissism, including mental health disorders that are related to narcissism. Thanks again! Meri

Wookie[edit]

I tought Wookie got medal as well! If he didn't that's really a shame >:( -- Obradović Goran (talk 02:20, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edits[edit]

Please cease your reverts of my edits, particularly at List of political epithets. -- Nikodemos (f.k.a. Mihnea) 18:13, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please cease your groundless allegations of vandalism. My moderate edits made in good faith to correct obvious pov are not vandalism. WOOKIEwantMEDAL 20:20, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't we start a discussion on the Talk pages and try to resolve our dispute rather than reverting? Your edits are by no means moderate; to give just one example, over at the List of political epithets, you keep replacing "liberals in the entertainment industry" (my version) with "liberals who dominate the entertainment industry" (your version). Which of those is NPOV? -- Nikodemos (f.k.a. Mihnea) 00:09, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is like the pot calling the kettle black. Actually, that is not even my text. It must have been contributed by someone else and got caught in our reverts. It is also a poor example, why don't you trot out your more blatantly pov phrases for examination? Oh, and why two names? Trying to hide something? WOOKIEwantMEDAL 22:33, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jane Fonda[edit]

Why did you revert the edits that I had spent so much time making in Jane Fonda's article? I had added sections on her new autobiography, her workout videos, and I had clarified and cleaned up several other sections in her article, and you seemingly reverted all of the edits made in the past 2-3 weeks. The article was tagged for cleanup, and I tried very hard to improve it. Please explain your rationale for your reversion promptly, or I may feel the need to undo your reversion of the article.

Andrea Parton 17:17, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]