User talk:Waberi4291

July 2021

Hello, I'm Jacob300. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Horn of Africa have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Jacob300 (talk) 20:03, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Somali language, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jacob300 (talk) 20:04, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Somalia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. –Gladamas (talk · contribs) 20:33, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Somalia, you may be blocked from editing. David Biddulph (talk) 12:08, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

August 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at East Africa, you may be blocked from editing. Jacob300 (talk) 10:17, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Jacob300. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to East Africa have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Jacob300 (talk) 18:19, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- Scott Burley (talk) 19:22, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

UTRS 46227

UTRS appeal #46227 has been closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:12, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Waberi4291 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

My editing is being very constructive. I made Wikipedia account because as I was doing research paper on Africa, I came across something or information that was wrong and fake. I made the changes and editing because I believed and still do it is right. Before I made the changes, I checked other website like the African Union to find a country called "Somaliland, from there I found out, it's just state of Somalia" then I made the changes as I believed the information presented on the page was wrong. I am not here to champion any cause as I have no issue with anything other than the wrong information presented. I was reported by a user called Jacob300 and I am still new and learning how to navigate the website so I could get to talk with him. I sincerely changed these information presented in the website because as history major, I believed it was wrong and misinformation. Also vandalism was being committed on Horn of Africa page and Somalia page before I edited it. I just did the right thing to find because I wanted the right information to be presented. My block was not fair as everything I did is in-line with current situation. I use Wikipedia to find sources, and information daily and I didn't want the site to have wrong information. Thank you Waberi4291 (talk) 02:57, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You(and others) are free to believe what you wish about Somaliland, but Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources state, and they tell about the existence of this entity that considers itself to be a sovereign state, and they tell about how this entity holds elections for what it considers to be its government. Articles correctly state that it is not recognized internationally. This is all allowed and cannot be removed just because you might disagree with it, because that's what sources say. We don't edit based on our personal opinions, but on what independent sources state. You will need to provide sufficient assurance that you will edit based on the content of reliable sources and not your personal views on the matter in order to be unblocked. Since you think what you did was correct, this request does not do that, so I am declining it. 331dot (talk) 08:23, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It's not up to me any longer, but quite possibly you will need to agree to a topic ban from editing about Somaliland as part of being unblocked. 331dot (talk) 08:25, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

How can I agree on topic ban. There is many historical misinformation that I want change. There has to be something else without giving the right to edit. This looks like stifling any opposing ideas. Waberi4291 (talk) 21:59, 6 August 2021 (UTC)