User talk:WalterKlaus3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Teahouse logo
Hello, WalterKlaus3! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Akevsharma (talk) 04:08, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Danny Lauter moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Danny Lauter, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 11:55, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Danny Lauter[edit]

Hello, WalterKlaus3, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Bensci54, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Danny Lauter, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Lauter.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bensci54}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bensci54 (talk) 17:00, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Bensci54:, Thank you for showing interested in this article. I really appreciate your insight. I have conducted months of research on this student athlete and I feel that I have found enough information that demonstrates his credibility. I only have presented a high school photo in the article because I feel that it gets the point across that Danny is a up and coming athlete. Also, with the entire Name, Image, and Likeness culture that athletes are presented with today, I feel that this page creation is important. Throughout his athletic career, Danny has gone viral with millions of views granting him the right to be represented on this platform. Also, he was recruited by a lot of notable schools and I found that some of those schools included Colorado, UCLA, Northwestern, Vanderbilt and the list goes on. He is currently battling for the starting job and has a great change of changing the Hoyas program around. Also, Danny is continuing the tradition of playing Division One Football. Multiple members of his family have played at the highest level. Once again thank you for your help!

Editing with a conflict of interest[edit]

Information icon Hello, WalterKlaus3. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.-- Ponyobons mots 18:39, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal for Creation of WIKI Page for Danny Lauter.[edit]

@Bensci54:, I know that this page has been deleted before and that I have tried to create it on a couple different occasions. i am someone who is very interested in American football. I have seen this athlete perform on a number of occasions. Recently, He broke Georgetown University's Single Game Passing Record and tied the record for completing in a single game. He did this in his first collegiate game. I know that when I first tried to publish this article about him, he lacked significant coverage, now I feel that this acceptable for publication. I will include some of the article that have been written about him thus far. https://guhoyas.com/news/2023/10/28/football-hoyas-fall-to-no-19-21-lafayette-on-senior-day.aspx

https://guhoyas.com/news/2023/10/30/football-lauter-earns-patriot-league-weekly-honorable-mention.aspx

Walter Klaus (talk) 20:30, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It took me a moment to refresh my memory about this case; you have had this article deleted at least three times via different processes, including a deletion discussion. You've been blocked for sockpuppetry because you created a separate account to do the same thing. My most generous assessment of this situation is that you have gotten too invested in this subject, and you need to step away: further attempts to create a page about Danny Lauter in the near future are going to be considered disruptive. Please find something else to write about. Vanamonde (Talk) 23:38, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WalterKlaus3. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Vanamonde93 (talk) 16:55, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]