Jump to content

User talk:Walter Osztovics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

ARGE OEVV

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Walter Osztovics. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page ARGE OEVV, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.

Please note that in accordance to our conflict of interest editing guidelines, I have moved your article to Draft:ARGE OEVV, as editors with a conflict of interest should not create articles straight onto the mainspace. When you are ready to submit the page for review by our Articles for Creation reviewers, please do so by adding {{subst:submit}} to the top of the draft. Thank you. Sdrqaz (talk) 14:17, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am aware that you have declared your paid status, but the article should be put through the AfC process. Sdrqaz (talk) 14:17, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Styyx was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
~StyyxTalk? ^-^ 14:54, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Missvain was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Missvain (talk) 17:27, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Walter Osztovics! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Missvain (talk) 17:27, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mobility Association Austria moved to draftspace

[edit]

As a paid editor, you should submit new articles through the articles for creation process. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Bensci54 (talk) 16:46, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Jamiebuba (talk) 12:53, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Mobility Association Austria, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jamiebuba (talk) 12:53, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Modussiccandi. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Modussiccandi (talk) 13:14, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Modussiccandi,
you are terribly mistaken if you rate my article as “promotional advertising”. The Mobility Association is a public organization run by the Austrian State with the task of improving public transport by coordination their service on a local level all across the nation. It is not a company, does not work for profit and has no business interests. It cooperates with analogous organizations in other European countries as well as with EU-organizations.
Since its work is mainly done in the background there is little media coverage, making it hard to find links to outside sources. But the organization is of highest importance to the public and is an international player in the field of public transport.
Saying that the article is “against Wikipedia policy” of that it is not “objectively written” is utter nonsense. I urge you to reconsider your judgment. The idea that Wikipedia does not inform its users about the ever more important developments in public transport would be more than absurd. Walter Osztovics (talk) 09:02, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]