User talk:Wanderingscribe

Please familiarise yourself with WP:NPOV before making further edits to Wandering Scribe. Your recent edit diff does not conform to the standards required for Wikipedia articles. Please also be careful not to damage the formatting of articles by pasting in large amounts of unformatted text. Thanks, --YFB ¿ 22:43, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I second that. The material you are trying to include contravenes our no original research policy. If you can find reliable external sources discussing the issue (not blogs) then you can edit the article to include the information in accordance with our neutral point of view policy, but otherwise it will be reverted. If you would like to have the article deleted then the proper forum would be articles for deletion, where the matter could be discussed. Thanks. --Cherry blossom tree 22:50, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, stop it. --Cherry blossom tree 09:30, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits to Wandering Scribe

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's NPOV policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Wandering Scribe, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --YFB ¿ 12:21, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits have been based on WS's own blog statements (or the discrepencies contained therein: Yeats' Tower is nowhere near 'the exact center of Ireland'). She states early on that she used a false address to claim benefits, and there are indeed no references whatsoever to her (alleged) abusive childhood in her blog - rather, she states how she made many journeys to and from Ireland with her father whilst she was at boarding school. According to recent publicity, this must have been either the father who gave her up soon after she was born, or the uncle/'father' who abused her. If you are saying that her own blog is not sufficiently evidence to be cited as a source, then you are but a step away from admitting that it is, as many suspect, a complete work of fiction. I would be deeply interested in your views on, and response to, this. Bellagio, 11/19/06