User talk:Wataana

February 2012[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mattinbgn (talk) 08:45, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A sockpuppet of DavidYork71 (talk · contribs). See edit history for clear edit pattern consistent with past socking. -- Mattinbgn (talk) 08:48, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wataana (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

?? No common element between this and that Wataana (talk) 09:16, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

ORLY? Jayron32 21:53, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wataana (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Shouldn't take this long for someone independent of the original admin to review this, should it?Wataana (talk) 20:52, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Reviewed above. Jayron32 21:53, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding your request for a review. The thread is Block review. Thank you. Mattinbgn (talk) 21:05, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]