User talk:Wauteurz

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Wauteurz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! GigglesnortHotel (talk) 14:55, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article additions[edit]

Hi there, welcome to Wikipedia. Please consider adding at least one Reliable Source to each of the articles you create. Thank you. GigglesnortHotel (talk) 15:11, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to. Translating pages from Dutch, if the original page doesn't have a source, then I can't give much of a reliable source either.
Wauteurz (talk) 15:18, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just Google the term. You can usually find a link to a city website or some sort of Dutch local site that at least mentions the subject. GigglesnortHotel (talk) 15:24, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Did so for the majority earlier today, but I'll delve more into it later. I believe I do have some verbal sources, but those aren't that easy to be considered notable.
Wauteurz (talk) 15:27, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I added one to De Huet, for example. For cities and locations the sources don't have to be outstanding, it's really just for verification they exist. GigglesnortHotel (talk) 15:28, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So for instance, I could link a site such as Blik Op Zuid, a local magazine, for all of the districts that are located South of the Oude IJssel, right?
Wauteurz (talk) 15:38, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Schouwburg Amphion[edit]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shouwburg Amphion[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shouwburg Amphion requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Randykitty (talk) 16:48, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than delete this article, I have "userfied" it to User:Wauteurz/Shouwburg Amphion where you can work on it. Wikipedia has an inclusion test called Wikipedia:Notability which is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Significant means more than just listing-type mentions; reliable excludes Youtube, Facebook, blogs, places where anyone can post anything; independent excludes the subject's own website, affiliated ones and anything based on press releases. The test is, have people not connected with the subject thought it significant enough to write substantial comment about? See also Wikipedia:Notability (summary). JohnCD (talk) 17:07, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Page reworked and resubmitted Wauteurz (talk) 19:36, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Schouwburg Amphion (April 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Provide multiple independent reliable sources about the theater that have written about it in depth. The statements about its size, in particular, must be sourced (but are not the only requested references).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Schouwburg Amphion and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:30, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Wauteurz, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:30, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Page reworked and resubmitted Wauteurz (talk) 19:36, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Schouwburg Amphion (April 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Schouwburg Amphion and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:28, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Schouwburg Amphion[edit]

Hello, Wauteurz. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Schouwburg Amphion".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 17:06, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dichteren[edit]

Hello, Wauteurz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dichteren".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:19, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]